Cargando…

Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: The ULTRA-stroke program design

BACKGROUND: About 80% of all stroke survivors have an upper limb paresis immediately after stroke, only about a third of whom (30 to 40%) regain some dexterity within six months following conventional treatment programs. Of late, however, two recently developed interventions - constraint-induced mov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Delden, A (Lex) EQ, Peper, C (Lieke) E, Harlaar, Jaap, Daffertshofer, Andreas, Zijp, Nienke I, Nienhuys, Kirsten, Koppe, Peter, Kwakkel, Gert, Beek, Peter J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2780376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19895679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-57
_version_ 1782174474108403712
author van Delden, A (Lex) EQ
Peper, C (Lieke) E
Harlaar, Jaap
Daffertshofer, Andreas
Zijp, Nienke I
Nienhuys, Kirsten
Koppe, Peter
Kwakkel, Gert
Beek, Peter J
author_facet van Delden, A (Lex) EQ
Peper, C (Lieke) E
Harlaar, Jaap
Daffertshofer, Andreas
Zijp, Nienke I
Nienhuys, Kirsten
Koppe, Peter
Kwakkel, Gert
Beek, Peter J
author_sort van Delden, A (Lex) EQ
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: About 80% of all stroke survivors have an upper limb paresis immediately after stroke, only about a third of whom (30 to 40%) regain some dexterity within six months following conventional treatment programs. Of late, however, two recently developed interventions - constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC) - have shown promising results in the treatment of upper limb paresis in chronic stroke patients. The ULTRA-stroke (acronym for Upper Limb TRaining After stroke) program was conceived to assess the effectiveness of these interventions in subacute stroke patients and to examine how the observed changes in sensori-motor functioning relate to changes in stroke recovery mechanisms associated with peripheral stiffness, interlimb interactions, and cortical inter- and intrahemispheric networks. The present paper describes the design of this single-blinded randomized clinical trial (RCT), which has recently started and will take several years to complete. METHODS/DESIGN: Sixty patients with a first ever stroke will be recruited. Patients will be stratified in terms of their remaining motor ability at the distal part of the arm (i.e., wrist and finger movements) and randomized over three intervention groups receiving modified CIMT, modified BATRAC, or an equally intensive (i.e., dose-matched) conventional treatment program for 6 weeks. Primary outcome variable is the score on the Action Research Arm test (ARAT), which will be assessed before, directly after, and 6 weeks after the intervention. During those test sessions all patients will also undergo measurements aimed at investigating the associated recovery mechanisms using haptic robots and magneto-encephalography (MEG). DISCUSSION: ULTRA-stroke is a 3-year translational research program which aims (1) to assess the relative effectiveness of the three interventions, on a group level but also as a function of patient characteristics, and (2) to delineate the functional and neurophysiological changes that are induced by those interventions. The outcome on the ARAT together with information about changes in the associated mechanisms will provide a better understanding of how specific therapies influence neurobiological changes, and which post-stroke conditions lend themselves to specific treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ULTRA-stroke program is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR, http://www.trialregister.nl, number NTR1665).
format Text
id pubmed-2780376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27803762009-11-21 Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: The ULTRA-stroke program design van Delden, A (Lex) EQ Peper, C (Lieke) E Harlaar, Jaap Daffertshofer, Andreas Zijp, Nienke I Nienhuys, Kirsten Koppe, Peter Kwakkel, Gert Beek, Peter J BMC Neurol Study protocol BACKGROUND: About 80% of all stroke survivors have an upper limb paresis immediately after stroke, only about a third of whom (30 to 40%) regain some dexterity within six months following conventional treatment programs. Of late, however, two recently developed interventions - constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC) - have shown promising results in the treatment of upper limb paresis in chronic stroke patients. The ULTRA-stroke (acronym for Upper Limb TRaining After stroke) program was conceived to assess the effectiveness of these interventions in subacute stroke patients and to examine how the observed changes in sensori-motor functioning relate to changes in stroke recovery mechanisms associated with peripheral stiffness, interlimb interactions, and cortical inter- and intrahemispheric networks. The present paper describes the design of this single-blinded randomized clinical trial (RCT), which has recently started and will take several years to complete. METHODS/DESIGN: Sixty patients with a first ever stroke will be recruited. Patients will be stratified in terms of their remaining motor ability at the distal part of the arm (i.e., wrist and finger movements) and randomized over three intervention groups receiving modified CIMT, modified BATRAC, or an equally intensive (i.e., dose-matched) conventional treatment program for 6 weeks. Primary outcome variable is the score on the Action Research Arm test (ARAT), which will be assessed before, directly after, and 6 weeks after the intervention. During those test sessions all patients will also undergo measurements aimed at investigating the associated recovery mechanisms using haptic robots and magneto-encephalography (MEG). DISCUSSION: ULTRA-stroke is a 3-year translational research program which aims (1) to assess the relative effectiveness of the three interventions, on a group level but also as a function of patient characteristics, and (2) to delineate the functional and neurophysiological changes that are induced by those interventions. The outcome on the ARAT together with information about changes in the associated mechanisms will provide a better understanding of how specific therapies influence neurobiological changes, and which post-stroke conditions lend themselves to specific treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ULTRA-stroke program is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR, http://www.trialregister.nl, number NTR1665). BioMed Central 2009-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2780376/ /pubmed/19895679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-57 Text en Copyright ©2009 van Delden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study protocol
van Delden, A (Lex) EQ
Peper, C (Lieke) E
Harlaar, Jaap
Daffertshofer, Andreas
Zijp, Nienke I
Nienhuys, Kirsten
Koppe, Peter
Kwakkel, Gert
Beek, Peter J
Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: The ULTRA-stroke program design
title Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: The ULTRA-stroke program design
title_full Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: The ULTRA-stroke program design
title_fullStr Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: The ULTRA-stroke program design
title_full_unstemmed Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: The ULTRA-stroke program design
title_short Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: The ULTRA-stroke program design
title_sort comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: the ultra-stroke program design
topic Study protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2780376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19895679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-57
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeldenalexeq comparingunilateralandbilateralupperlimbtrainingtheultrastrokeprogramdesign
AT pepercliekee comparingunilateralandbilateralupperlimbtrainingtheultrastrokeprogramdesign
AT harlaarjaap comparingunilateralandbilateralupperlimbtrainingtheultrastrokeprogramdesign
AT daffertshoferandreas comparingunilateralandbilateralupperlimbtrainingtheultrastrokeprogramdesign
AT zijpnienkei comparingunilateralandbilateralupperlimbtrainingtheultrastrokeprogramdesign
AT nienhuyskirsten comparingunilateralandbilateralupperlimbtrainingtheultrastrokeprogramdesign
AT koppepeter comparingunilateralandbilateralupperlimbtrainingtheultrastrokeprogramdesign
AT kwakkelgert comparingunilateralandbilateralupperlimbtrainingtheultrastrokeprogramdesign
AT beekpeterj comparingunilateralandbilateralupperlimbtrainingtheultrastrokeprogramdesign