Cargando…

Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association

BACKGROUND: The project to develop a new Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score rating system for low back disorders, the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), is currently in progress. Part 1 of the study selected 25 “candidateȝ items for use on the JOABPEQ. The purpose of this cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukui, Mitsuru, Chiba, Kazuhiro, Kawakami, Mamoru, Kikuchi, Shinichi, Konno, Shinichi, Miyamoto, Masabumi, Seichi, Atsushi, Shimamura, Tadashi, Shirado, Osamu, Taguchi, Toshihiko, Takahashi, Kazuhisa, Takeshita, Katsushi, Tani, Toshikazu, Toyama, Yoshiaki, Yonenobu, Kazuo, Wada, Eiji, Tanaka, Takashi, Hirota, Yoshio
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2780682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18040634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1168-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The project to develop a new Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score rating system for low back disorders, the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), is currently in progress. Part 1 of the study selected 25 “candidateȝ items for use on the JOABPEQ. The purpose of this current Part 2 of the study was to verify the reliability of the questionnaire. METHODS: A total of 161 patients with low-back disorders of any type participated in the study. Each patient was interviewed twice at an interval of 2 weeks using the same questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by determining the extension of the kappa and weighted kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Both kappa and weighted kappa were more than 0.50 for all but one item, which was 0.48. The lower 95% confidence interval exceeded 0.4 in all but two items, which was 0.39. This implied that the test–retest reliability of JOABPEQ was acceptable as a measure of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The tentative questionnaire of the JOABPEQ with 25 items was confirmed to be reliable enough to describe the quality of life of patients who suffer low back disorders.