Cargando…

Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association

BACKGROUND: The project to develop a new Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score rating system for low back disorders, the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), is currently in progress. Part 1 of the study selected 25 “candidateȝ items for use on the JOABPEQ. The purpose of this cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukui, Mitsuru, Chiba, Kazuhiro, Kawakami, Mamoru, Kikuchi, Shinichi, Konno, Shinichi, Miyamoto, Masabumi, Seichi, Atsushi, Shimamura, Tadashi, Shirado, Osamu, Taguchi, Toshihiko, Takahashi, Kazuhisa, Takeshita, Katsushi, Tani, Toshikazu, Toyama, Yoshiaki, Yonenobu, Kazuo, Wada, Eiji, Tanaka, Takashi, Hirota, Yoshio
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2780682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18040634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1168-4
_version_ 1782174518565928960
author Fukui, Mitsuru
Chiba, Kazuhiro
Kawakami, Mamoru
Kikuchi, Shinichi
Konno, Shinichi
Miyamoto, Masabumi
Seichi, Atsushi
Shimamura, Tadashi
Shirado, Osamu
Taguchi, Toshihiko
Takahashi, Kazuhisa
Takeshita, Katsushi
Tani, Toshikazu
Toyama, Yoshiaki
Yonenobu, Kazuo
Wada, Eiji
Tanaka, Takashi
Hirota, Yoshio
author_facet Fukui, Mitsuru
Chiba, Kazuhiro
Kawakami, Mamoru
Kikuchi, Shinichi
Konno, Shinichi
Miyamoto, Masabumi
Seichi, Atsushi
Shimamura, Tadashi
Shirado, Osamu
Taguchi, Toshihiko
Takahashi, Kazuhisa
Takeshita, Katsushi
Tani, Toshikazu
Toyama, Yoshiaki
Yonenobu, Kazuo
Wada, Eiji
Tanaka, Takashi
Hirota, Yoshio
author_sort Fukui, Mitsuru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The project to develop a new Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score rating system for low back disorders, the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), is currently in progress. Part 1 of the study selected 25 “candidateȝ items for use on the JOABPEQ. The purpose of this current Part 2 of the study was to verify the reliability of the questionnaire. METHODS: A total of 161 patients with low-back disorders of any type participated in the study. Each patient was interviewed twice at an interval of 2 weeks using the same questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by determining the extension of the kappa and weighted kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Both kappa and weighted kappa were more than 0.50 for all but one item, which was 0.48. The lower 95% confidence interval exceeded 0.4 in all but two items, which was 0.39. This implied that the test–retest reliability of JOABPEQ was acceptable as a measure of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The tentative questionnaire of the JOABPEQ with 25 items was confirmed to be reliable enough to describe the quality of life of patients who suffer low back disorders.
format Text
id pubmed-2780682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27806822009-11-23 Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Fukui, Mitsuru Chiba, Kazuhiro Kawakami, Mamoru Kikuchi, Shinichi Konno, Shinichi Miyamoto, Masabumi Seichi, Atsushi Shimamura, Tadashi Shirado, Osamu Taguchi, Toshihiko Takahashi, Kazuhisa Takeshita, Katsushi Tani, Toshikazu Toyama, Yoshiaki Yonenobu, Kazuo Wada, Eiji Tanaka, Takashi Hirota, Yoshio J Orthop Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: The project to develop a new Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score rating system for low back disorders, the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), is currently in progress. Part 1 of the study selected 25 “candidateȝ items for use on the JOABPEQ. The purpose of this current Part 2 of the study was to verify the reliability of the questionnaire. METHODS: A total of 161 patients with low-back disorders of any type participated in the study. Each patient was interviewed twice at an interval of 2 weeks using the same questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by determining the extension of the kappa and weighted kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Both kappa and weighted kappa were more than 0.50 for all but one item, which was 0.48. The lower 95% confidence interval exceeded 0.4 in all but two items, which was 0.39. This implied that the test–retest reliability of JOABPEQ was acceptable as a measure of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The tentative questionnaire of the JOABPEQ with 25 items was confirmed to be reliable enough to describe the quality of life of patients who suffer low back disorders. Springer-Verlag 2007-11-30 2007-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2780682/ /pubmed/18040634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1168-4 Text en © The Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2007
spellingShingle Original Article
Fukui, Mitsuru
Chiba, Kazuhiro
Kawakami, Mamoru
Kikuchi, Shinichi
Konno, Shinichi
Miyamoto, Masabumi
Seichi, Atsushi
Shimamura, Tadashi
Shirado, Osamu
Taguchi, Toshihiko
Takahashi, Kazuhisa
Takeshita, Katsushi
Tani, Toshikazu
Toyama, Yoshiaki
Yonenobu, Kazuo
Wada, Eiji
Tanaka, Takashi
Hirota, Yoshio
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
title Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
title_full Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
title_fullStr Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
title_full_unstemmed Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
title_short Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
title_sort japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire. part 2. verification of its reliability: the subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the japanese orthopaedic association
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2780682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18040634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1168-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fukuimitsuru japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT chibakazuhiro japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT kawakamimamoru japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT kikuchishinichi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT konnoshinichi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT miyamotomasabumi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT seichiatsushi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT shimamuratadashi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT shiradoosamu japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT taguchitoshihiko japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT takahashikazuhisa japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT takeshitakatsushi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT tanitoshikazu japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT toyamayoshiaki japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT yonenobukazuo japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT wadaeiji japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT tanakatakashi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation
AT hirotayoshio japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation