Cargando…
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
BACKGROUND: The project to develop a new Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score rating system for low back disorders, the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), is currently in progress. Part 1 of the study selected 25 “candidateȝ items for use on the JOABPEQ. The purpose of this cu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2780682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18040634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1168-4 |
_version_ | 1782174518565928960 |
---|---|
author | Fukui, Mitsuru Chiba, Kazuhiro Kawakami, Mamoru Kikuchi, Shinichi Konno, Shinichi Miyamoto, Masabumi Seichi, Atsushi Shimamura, Tadashi Shirado, Osamu Taguchi, Toshihiko Takahashi, Kazuhisa Takeshita, Katsushi Tani, Toshikazu Toyama, Yoshiaki Yonenobu, Kazuo Wada, Eiji Tanaka, Takashi Hirota, Yoshio |
author_facet | Fukui, Mitsuru Chiba, Kazuhiro Kawakami, Mamoru Kikuchi, Shinichi Konno, Shinichi Miyamoto, Masabumi Seichi, Atsushi Shimamura, Tadashi Shirado, Osamu Taguchi, Toshihiko Takahashi, Kazuhisa Takeshita, Katsushi Tani, Toshikazu Toyama, Yoshiaki Yonenobu, Kazuo Wada, Eiji Tanaka, Takashi Hirota, Yoshio |
author_sort | Fukui, Mitsuru |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The project to develop a new Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score rating system for low back disorders, the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), is currently in progress. Part 1 of the study selected 25 “candidateȝ items for use on the JOABPEQ. The purpose of this current Part 2 of the study was to verify the reliability of the questionnaire. METHODS: A total of 161 patients with low-back disorders of any type participated in the study. Each patient was interviewed twice at an interval of 2 weeks using the same questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by determining the extension of the kappa and weighted kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Both kappa and weighted kappa were more than 0.50 for all but one item, which was 0.48. The lower 95% confidence interval exceeded 0.4 in all but two items, which was 0.39. This implied that the test–retest reliability of JOABPEQ was acceptable as a measure of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The tentative questionnaire of the JOABPEQ with 25 items was confirmed to be reliable enough to describe the quality of life of patients who suffer low back disorders. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2780682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27806822009-11-23 Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Fukui, Mitsuru Chiba, Kazuhiro Kawakami, Mamoru Kikuchi, Shinichi Konno, Shinichi Miyamoto, Masabumi Seichi, Atsushi Shimamura, Tadashi Shirado, Osamu Taguchi, Toshihiko Takahashi, Kazuhisa Takeshita, Katsushi Tani, Toshikazu Toyama, Yoshiaki Yonenobu, Kazuo Wada, Eiji Tanaka, Takashi Hirota, Yoshio J Orthop Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: The project to develop a new Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score rating system for low back disorders, the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), is currently in progress. Part 1 of the study selected 25 “candidateȝ items for use on the JOABPEQ. The purpose of this current Part 2 of the study was to verify the reliability of the questionnaire. METHODS: A total of 161 patients with low-back disorders of any type participated in the study. Each patient was interviewed twice at an interval of 2 weeks using the same questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by determining the extension of the kappa and weighted kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Both kappa and weighted kappa were more than 0.50 for all but one item, which was 0.48. The lower 95% confidence interval exceeded 0.4 in all but two items, which was 0.39. This implied that the test–retest reliability of JOABPEQ was acceptable as a measure of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The tentative questionnaire of the JOABPEQ with 25 items was confirmed to be reliable enough to describe the quality of life of patients who suffer low back disorders. Springer-Verlag 2007-11-30 2007-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2780682/ /pubmed/18040634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1168-4 Text en © The Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2007 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fukui, Mitsuru Chiba, Kazuhiro Kawakami, Mamoru Kikuchi, Shinichi Konno, Shinichi Miyamoto, Masabumi Seichi, Atsushi Shimamura, Tadashi Shirado, Osamu Taguchi, Toshihiko Takahashi, Kazuhisa Takeshita, Katsushi Tani, Toshikazu Toyama, Yoshiaki Yonenobu, Kazuo Wada, Eiji Tanaka, Takashi Hirota, Yoshio Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association |
title | Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association |
title_full | Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association |
title_fullStr | Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association |
title_full_unstemmed | Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association |
title_short | Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association |
title_sort | japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire. part 2. verification of its reliability: the subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the japanese orthopaedic association |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2780682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18040634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1168-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fukuimitsuru japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT chibakazuhiro japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT kawakamimamoru japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT kikuchishinichi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT konnoshinichi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT miyamotomasabumi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT seichiatsushi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT shimamuratadashi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT shiradoosamu japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT taguchitoshihiko japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT takahashikazuhisa japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT takeshitakatsushi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT tanitoshikazu japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT toyamayoshiaki japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT yonenobukazuo japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT wadaeiji japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT tanakatakashi japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation AT hirotayoshio japaneseorthopaedicassociationbackpainevaluationquestionnairepart2verificationofitsreliabilitythesubcommitteeonlowbackpainandcervicalmyelopathyevaluationoftheclinicaloutcomecommitteeofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociation |