Cargando…

Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators

Concerns have been raised regarding the availability of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) during an influenza pandemic. One possible strategy to mitigate a respirator shortage is to reuse FFRs following a biological dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viscusi, Dennis J., Bergman, Michael S., Eimer, Benjamin C., Shaffer, Ronald E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19805391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mep070
_version_ 1782174580965638144
author Viscusi, Dennis J.
Bergman, Michael S.
Eimer, Benjamin C.
Shaffer, Ronald E.
author_facet Viscusi, Dennis J.
Bergman, Michael S.
Eimer, Benjamin C.
Shaffer, Ronald E.
author_sort Viscusi, Dennis J.
collection PubMed
description Concerns have been raised regarding the availability of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) during an influenza pandemic. One possible strategy to mitigate a respirator shortage is to reuse FFRs following a biological decontamination process to render infectious material on the FFR inactive. However, little data exist on the effects of decontamination methods on respirator integrity and performance. This study evaluated five decontamination methods [ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), ethylene oxide, vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP), microwave oven irradiation, and bleach] using nine models of NIOSH-certified respirators (three models each of N95 FFRs, surgical N95 respirators, and P100 FFRs) to determine which methods should be considered for future research studies. Following treatment by each decontamination method, the FFRs were evaluated for changes in physical appearance, odor, and laboratory performance (filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance). Additional experiments (dry heat laboratory oven exposures, off-gassing, and FFR hydrophobicity) were subsequently conducted to better understand material properties and possible health risks to the respirator user following decontamination. However, this study did not assess the efficiency of the decontamination methods to inactivate viable microorganisms. Microwave oven irradiation melted samples from two FFR models. The remainder of the FFR samples that had been decontaminated had expected levels of filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance. The scent of bleach remained noticeable following overnight drying and low levels of chlorine gas were found to off-gas from bleach-decontaminated FFRs when rehydrated with deionized water. UVGI, ethylene oxide (EtO), and VHP were found to be the most promising decontamination methods; however, concerns remain about the throughput capabilities for EtO and VHP. Further research is needed before any specific decontamination methods can be recommended.
format Text
id pubmed-2781738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27817382010-11-01 Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators Viscusi, Dennis J. Bergman, Michael S. Eimer, Benjamin C. Shaffer, Ronald E. Ann Occup Hyg Original Articles Concerns have been raised regarding the availability of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) during an influenza pandemic. One possible strategy to mitigate a respirator shortage is to reuse FFRs following a biological decontamination process to render infectious material on the FFR inactive. However, little data exist on the effects of decontamination methods on respirator integrity and performance. This study evaluated five decontamination methods [ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), ethylene oxide, vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP), microwave oven irradiation, and bleach] using nine models of NIOSH-certified respirators (three models each of N95 FFRs, surgical N95 respirators, and P100 FFRs) to determine which methods should be considered for future research studies. Following treatment by each decontamination method, the FFRs were evaluated for changes in physical appearance, odor, and laboratory performance (filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance). Additional experiments (dry heat laboratory oven exposures, off-gassing, and FFR hydrophobicity) were subsequently conducted to better understand material properties and possible health risks to the respirator user following decontamination. However, this study did not assess the efficiency of the decontamination methods to inactivate viable microorganisms. Microwave oven irradiation melted samples from two FFR models. The remainder of the FFR samples that had been decontaminated had expected levels of filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance. The scent of bleach remained noticeable following overnight drying and low levels of chlorine gas were found to off-gas from bleach-decontaminated FFRs when rehydrated with deionized water. UVGI, ethylene oxide (EtO), and VHP were found to be the most promising decontamination methods; however, concerns remain about the throughput capabilities for EtO and VHP. Further research is needed before any specific decontamination methods can be recommended. Oxford University Press 2009-11 2009-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2781738/ /pubmed/19805391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mep070 Text en © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Viscusi, Dennis J.
Bergman, Michael S.
Eimer, Benjamin C.
Shaffer, Ronald E.
Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators
title Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators
title_full Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators
title_fullStr Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators
title_short Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators
title_sort evaluation of five decontamination methods for filtering facepiece respirators
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19805391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mep070
work_keys_str_mv AT viscusidennisj evaluationoffivedecontaminationmethodsforfilteringfacepiecerespirators
AT bergmanmichaels evaluationoffivedecontaminationmethodsforfilteringfacepiecerespirators
AT eimerbenjaminc evaluationoffivedecontaminationmethodsforfilteringfacepiecerespirators
AT shafferronalde evaluationoffivedecontaminationmethodsforfilteringfacepiecerespirators