Cargando…
Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction
BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of the amount of publicly available reports on biomedical experimental results has recently caused a boost of text mining approaches for protein interaction extraction. Most approaches rely implicitly or explicitly on linguistic, i.e., lexical and syntactic, data extract...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19909518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-374 |
_version_ | 1782174595437035520 |
---|---|
author | Fayruzov, Timur De Cock, Martine Cornelis, Chris Hoste, Veronique |
author_facet | Fayruzov, Timur De Cock, Martine Cornelis, Chris Hoste, Veronique |
author_sort | Fayruzov, Timur |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of the amount of publicly available reports on biomedical experimental results has recently caused a boost of text mining approaches for protein interaction extraction. Most approaches rely implicitly or explicitly on linguistic, i.e., lexical and syntactic, data extracted from text. However, only few attempts have been made to evaluate the contribution of the different feature types. In this work, we contribute to this evaluation by studying the relative importance of deep syntactic features, i.e., grammatical relations, shallow syntactic features (part-of-speech information) and lexical features. For this purpose, we use a recently proposed approach that uses support vector machines with structured kernels. RESULTS: Our results reveal that the contribution of the different feature types varies for the different data sets on which the experiments were conducted. The smaller the training corpus compared to the test data, the more important the role of grammatical relations becomes. Moreover, deep syntactic information based classifiers prove to be more robust on heterogeneous texts where no or only limited common vocabulary is shared. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that grammatical relations play an important role in the interaction extraction task. Moreover, the net advantage of adding lexical and shallow syntactic features is small related to the number of added features. This implies that efficient classifiers can be built by using only a small fraction of the features that are typically being used in recent approaches. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2781821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27818212009-11-25 Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction Fayruzov, Timur De Cock, Martine Cornelis, Chris Hoste, Veronique BMC Bioinformatics Research article BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of the amount of publicly available reports on biomedical experimental results has recently caused a boost of text mining approaches for protein interaction extraction. Most approaches rely implicitly or explicitly on linguistic, i.e., lexical and syntactic, data extracted from text. However, only few attempts have been made to evaluate the contribution of the different feature types. In this work, we contribute to this evaluation by studying the relative importance of deep syntactic features, i.e., grammatical relations, shallow syntactic features (part-of-speech information) and lexical features. For this purpose, we use a recently proposed approach that uses support vector machines with structured kernels. RESULTS: Our results reveal that the contribution of the different feature types varies for the different data sets on which the experiments were conducted. The smaller the training corpus compared to the test data, the more important the role of grammatical relations becomes. Moreover, deep syntactic information based classifiers prove to be more robust on heterogeneous texts where no or only limited common vocabulary is shared. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that grammatical relations play an important role in the interaction extraction task. Moreover, the net advantage of adding lexical and shallow syntactic features is small related to the number of added features. This implies that efficient classifiers can be built by using only a small fraction of the features that are typically being used in recent approaches. BioMed Central 2009-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2781821/ /pubmed/19909518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-374 Text en Copyright ©2009 Fayruzov et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Fayruzov, Timur De Cock, Martine Cornelis, Chris Hoste, Veronique Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction |
title | Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction |
title_full | Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction |
title_fullStr | Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction |
title_full_unstemmed | Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction |
title_short | Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction |
title_sort | linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19909518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fayruzovtimur linguisticfeatureanalysisforproteininteractionextraction AT decockmartine linguisticfeatureanalysisforproteininteractionextraction AT cornelischris linguisticfeatureanalysisforproteininteractionextraction AT hosteveronique linguisticfeatureanalysisforproteininteractionextraction |