Cargando…

Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction

BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of the amount of publicly available reports on biomedical experimental results has recently caused a boost of text mining approaches for protein interaction extraction. Most approaches rely implicitly or explicitly on linguistic, i.e., lexical and syntactic, data extract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fayruzov, Timur, De Cock, Martine, Cornelis, Chris, Hoste, Veronique
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19909518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-374
_version_ 1782174595437035520
author Fayruzov, Timur
De Cock, Martine
Cornelis, Chris
Hoste, Veronique
author_facet Fayruzov, Timur
De Cock, Martine
Cornelis, Chris
Hoste, Veronique
author_sort Fayruzov, Timur
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of the amount of publicly available reports on biomedical experimental results has recently caused a boost of text mining approaches for protein interaction extraction. Most approaches rely implicitly or explicitly on linguistic, i.e., lexical and syntactic, data extracted from text. However, only few attempts have been made to evaluate the contribution of the different feature types. In this work, we contribute to this evaluation by studying the relative importance of deep syntactic features, i.e., grammatical relations, shallow syntactic features (part-of-speech information) and lexical features. For this purpose, we use a recently proposed approach that uses support vector machines with structured kernels. RESULTS: Our results reveal that the contribution of the different feature types varies for the different data sets on which the experiments were conducted. The smaller the training corpus compared to the test data, the more important the role of grammatical relations becomes. Moreover, deep syntactic information based classifiers prove to be more robust on heterogeneous texts where no or only limited common vocabulary is shared. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that grammatical relations play an important role in the interaction extraction task. Moreover, the net advantage of adding lexical and shallow syntactic features is small related to the number of added features. This implies that efficient classifiers can be built by using only a small fraction of the features that are typically being used in recent approaches.
format Text
id pubmed-2781821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27818212009-11-25 Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction Fayruzov, Timur De Cock, Martine Cornelis, Chris Hoste, Veronique BMC Bioinformatics Research article BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of the amount of publicly available reports on biomedical experimental results has recently caused a boost of text mining approaches for protein interaction extraction. Most approaches rely implicitly or explicitly on linguistic, i.e., lexical and syntactic, data extracted from text. However, only few attempts have been made to evaluate the contribution of the different feature types. In this work, we contribute to this evaluation by studying the relative importance of deep syntactic features, i.e., grammatical relations, shallow syntactic features (part-of-speech information) and lexical features. For this purpose, we use a recently proposed approach that uses support vector machines with structured kernels. RESULTS: Our results reveal that the contribution of the different feature types varies for the different data sets on which the experiments were conducted. The smaller the training corpus compared to the test data, the more important the role of grammatical relations becomes. Moreover, deep syntactic information based classifiers prove to be more robust on heterogeneous texts where no or only limited common vocabulary is shared. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that grammatical relations play an important role in the interaction extraction task. Moreover, the net advantage of adding lexical and shallow syntactic features is small related to the number of added features. This implies that efficient classifiers can be built by using only a small fraction of the features that are typically being used in recent approaches. BioMed Central 2009-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2781821/ /pubmed/19909518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-374 Text en Copyright ©2009 Fayruzov et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Fayruzov, Timur
De Cock, Martine
Cornelis, Chris
Hoste, Veronique
Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction
title Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction
title_full Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction
title_fullStr Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction
title_full_unstemmed Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction
title_short Linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction
title_sort linguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extraction
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19909518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-374
work_keys_str_mv AT fayruzovtimur linguisticfeatureanalysisforproteininteractionextraction
AT decockmartine linguisticfeatureanalysisforproteininteractionextraction
AT cornelischris linguisticfeatureanalysisforproteininteractionextraction
AT hosteveronique linguisticfeatureanalysisforproteininteractionextraction