Cargando…

An Evaluation of Coverage and Compliance of Mass Drug Administration 2006 for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis in Endemic Areas of Gujarat

BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) means once-in-a-year administration of diethyl carbamazine (DEC) tablet to all people (excluding children under 2 years, pregnant women and severely ill persons) in identified endemic areas. It aims at cessation of transmission of lymphatic filariasis. OBJE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Pradeep, Prajapati, PB, Saxena, Deepak, Kavishwar, Abhay B, Kurian, George
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2782227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19966995
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.39242
_version_ 1782174629921554432
author Kumar, Pradeep
Prajapati, PB
Saxena, Deepak
Kavishwar, Abhay B
Kurian, George
author_facet Kumar, Pradeep
Prajapati, PB
Saxena, Deepak
Kavishwar, Abhay B
Kurian, George
author_sort Kumar, Pradeep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) means once-in-a-year administration of diethyl carbamazine (DEC) tablet to all people (excluding children under 2 years, pregnant women and severely ill persons) in identified endemic areas. It aims at cessation of transmission of lymphatic filariasis. OBJECTIVE: What has been the coverage and compliance of MDA in Gujarat during the campaign in December 2006? STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional population based house-to-house visit. SETTING: Urban and rural areas in Gujarat identified as endemic for filariasis where MDA 2006 was undertaken. STUDY VARIABLES: Exploratory - Rural and urban districts; Outcome - coverage, compliance, actual coverage, side effects. ANALYSIS: Percentage and proportions. RESULTS: Twenty-six clusters, each comprising 32 households from six endemic districts, yielded an eligible population of 4164. The coverage rate was 85.2% with variation across different areas. The compliance with drug ingestion was 89% with a gap of 11% to be targeted by intensive IEC. The effective coverage (75.8%) was much below the target (85%). Side effects of DEC were minimum, transient and drug-specific. Overall coverage was marginally better in rural areas. The causes of poor coverage and compliance have been discussed and relevant suggestions have been made.
format Text
id pubmed-2782227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27822272009-12-04 An Evaluation of Coverage and Compliance of Mass Drug Administration 2006 for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis in Endemic Areas of Gujarat Kumar, Pradeep Prajapati, PB Saxena, Deepak Kavishwar, Abhay B Kurian, George Indian J Community Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) means once-in-a-year administration of diethyl carbamazine (DEC) tablet to all people (excluding children under 2 years, pregnant women and severely ill persons) in identified endemic areas. It aims at cessation of transmission of lymphatic filariasis. OBJECTIVE: What has been the coverage and compliance of MDA in Gujarat during the campaign in December 2006? STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional population based house-to-house visit. SETTING: Urban and rural areas in Gujarat identified as endemic for filariasis where MDA 2006 was undertaken. STUDY VARIABLES: Exploratory - Rural and urban districts; Outcome - coverage, compliance, actual coverage, side effects. ANALYSIS: Percentage and proportions. RESULTS: Twenty-six clusters, each comprising 32 households from six endemic districts, yielded an eligible population of 4164. The coverage rate was 85.2% with variation across different areas. The compliance with drug ingestion was 89% with a gap of 11% to be targeted by intensive IEC. The effective coverage (75.8%) was much below the target (85%). Side effects of DEC were minimum, transient and drug-specific. Overall coverage was marginally better in rural areas. The causes of poor coverage and compliance have been discussed and relevant suggestions have been made. Medknow Publications 2008-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2782227/ /pubmed/19966995 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.39242 Text en © Indian Journal of Community Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Pradeep
Prajapati, PB
Saxena, Deepak
Kavishwar, Abhay B
Kurian, George
An Evaluation of Coverage and Compliance of Mass Drug Administration 2006 for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis in Endemic Areas of Gujarat
title An Evaluation of Coverage and Compliance of Mass Drug Administration 2006 for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis in Endemic Areas of Gujarat
title_full An Evaluation of Coverage and Compliance of Mass Drug Administration 2006 for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis in Endemic Areas of Gujarat
title_fullStr An Evaluation of Coverage and Compliance of Mass Drug Administration 2006 for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis in Endemic Areas of Gujarat
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of Coverage and Compliance of Mass Drug Administration 2006 for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis in Endemic Areas of Gujarat
title_short An Evaluation of Coverage and Compliance of Mass Drug Administration 2006 for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis in Endemic Areas of Gujarat
title_sort evaluation of coverage and compliance of mass drug administration 2006 for elimination of lymphatic filariasis in endemic areas of gujarat
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2782227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19966995
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.39242
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarpradeep anevaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT prajapatipb anevaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT saxenadeepak anevaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT kavishwarabhayb anevaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT kuriangeorge anevaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT kumarpradeep evaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT prajapatipb evaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT saxenadeepak evaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT kavishwarabhayb evaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat
AT kuriangeorge evaluationofcoverageandcomplianceofmassdrugadministration2006foreliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinendemicareasofgujarat