Cargando…
Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and myomectomy for uterine prolapse: a case report and review of the literature
INTRODUCTION: A large number of hysterectomies are carried out for uterine prolapse, menorrhagia and other symptomatic but benign gynaecological conditions, which has increased interest in new approaches to treat these disorders. These new procedures are less invasive and offer reduced risk and fast...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2783099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19946516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-3-99 |
_version_ | 1782174675637370880 |
---|---|
author | Faraj, Radwan Broome, Jonathan |
author_facet | Faraj, Radwan Broome, Jonathan |
author_sort | Faraj, Radwan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A large number of hysterectomies are carried out for uterine prolapse, menorrhagia and other symptomatic but benign gynaecological conditions, which has increased interest in new approaches to treat these disorders. These new procedures are less invasive and offer reduced risk and faster recovery. CASE PRESENTATION: Sacrohysteropexy can be carried out instead of vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse. It involves using a synthetic mesh to suspend the uterus to the sacrum; this maintains durable anatomic restoration, normal vaginal axis and sexual function. A laparoscopic approach has major advantages over the abdominal route including shorter recovery time and less adhesion formation. We describe a laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in a 55-year-old Caucasian British woman that was technically difficult. An intramural uterine fibroid was encroaching just above the uterosacral ligament making mesh positioning impossible. This was removed and the procedure completed successfully. CONCLUSION: Posterior wall fibroid is not a contraindication for laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy. This procedure has increasingly become an effective treatment of uterine prolapse in women who have no indication for hysterectomy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2783099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27830992009-11-26 Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and myomectomy for uterine prolapse: a case report and review of the literature Faraj, Radwan Broome, Jonathan J Med Case Reports Case report INTRODUCTION: A large number of hysterectomies are carried out for uterine prolapse, menorrhagia and other symptomatic but benign gynaecological conditions, which has increased interest in new approaches to treat these disorders. These new procedures are less invasive and offer reduced risk and faster recovery. CASE PRESENTATION: Sacrohysteropexy can be carried out instead of vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse. It involves using a synthetic mesh to suspend the uterus to the sacrum; this maintains durable anatomic restoration, normal vaginal axis and sexual function. A laparoscopic approach has major advantages over the abdominal route including shorter recovery time and less adhesion formation. We describe a laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in a 55-year-old Caucasian British woman that was technically difficult. An intramural uterine fibroid was encroaching just above the uterosacral ligament making mesh positioning impossible. This was removed and the procedure completed successfully. CONCLUSION: Posterior wall fibroid is not a contraindication for laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy. This procedure has increasingly become an effective treatment of uterine prolapse in women who have no indication for hysterectomy. BioMed Central 2009-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2783099/ /pubmed/19946516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-3-99 Text en Copyright ©2009 Faraj and Broome; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case report Faraj, Radwan Broome, Jonathan Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and myomectomy for uterine prolapse: a case report and review of the literature |
title | Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and myomectomy for uterine prolapse: a case report and review of the literature |
title_full | Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and myomectomy for uterine prolapse: a case report and review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and myomectomy for uterine prolapse: a case report and review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and myomectomy for uterine prolapse: a case report and review of the literature |
title_short | Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and myomectomy for uterine prolapse: a case report and review of the literature |
title_sort | laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and myomectomy for uterine prolapse: a case report and review of the literature |
topic | Case report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2783099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19946516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-3-99 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farajradwan laparoscopicsacrohysteropexyandmyomectomyforuterineprolapseacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT broomejonathan laparoscopicsacrohysteropexyandmyomectomyforuterineprolapseacasereportandreviewoftheliterature |