Cargando…
Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study
INTRODUCTION: While propofol is associated with an infusion syndrome (PRIS) that may cause death, the incidence of PRIS is unknown. Determining the incidence of PRIS and the frequency of PRIS-related clinical manifestations are key steps prior to the completion of any controlled studies investigatin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2784401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19874582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8145 |
_version_ | 1782174741885353984 |
---|---|
author | Roberts, Russel J Barletta, Jeffrey F Fong, Jeffrey J Schumaker, Greg Kuper, Philip J Papadopoulos, Stella Yogaratnam, Dinesh Kendall, Elise Xamplas, Renee Gerlach, Anthony T Szumita, Paul M Anger, Kevin E Arpino, Paul A Voils, Stacey A Grgurich, Philip Ruthazer, Robin Devlin, John W |
author_facet | Roberts, Russel J Barletta, Jeffrey F Fong, Jeffrey J Schumaker, Greg Kuper, Philip J Papadopoulos, Stella Yogaratnam, Dinesh Kendall, Elise Xamplas, Renee Gerlach, Anthony T Szumita, Paul M Anger, Kevin E Arpino, Paul A Voils, Stacey A Grgurich, Philip Ruthazer, Robin Devlin, John W |
author_sort | Roberts, Russel J |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: While propofol is associated with an infusion syndrome (PRIS) that may cause death, the incidence of PRIS is unknown. Determining the incidence of PRIS and the frequency of PRIS-related clinical manifestations are key steps prior to the completion of any controlled studies investigating PRIS. This prospective, multicenter study sought to determine the incidence of PRIS and PRIS-related clinical manifestations in a large cohort of critically ill adults prescribed propofol. METHODS: Critically ill adults from 11 academic medical centers administered an infusion of propofol for [>/=] 24 hours were monitored at baseline and then on a daily basis until propofol was discontinued for the presence of 11 different PRIS-associated clinical manifestations and risk factors derived from 83 published case reports of PRIS. RESULTS: Among 1017 patients [medical (35%), neurosurgical (25%)], PRIS (defined as metabolic acidosis plus cardiac dysfunction and [>/=] 1 of: rhabdomyolysis, hypertriglyceridemia or renal failure occurring after the start of propofol therapy) developed in 11 (1.1%) patients an average of 3 (1-6) [median (range)] days after the start of propofol. While most (91%) of the patients who developed PRIS were receiving a vasopressor (80% initiated after the start of propofol therapy), few received a propofol dose >83 mcg/kg/min (18%) or died (18%). Compared to the 1006 patients who did not develop PRIS, the APACHE II score (25 +/- 6 vs 20 +/- 7, P = 0.01) was greater in patients with PRIS but both the duration of propofol use (P = 0.43) and ICU length of stay (P = 0.82) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Despite using a conservative definition for PRIS, and only considering new-onset PRIS clinical manifestations, the incidence of PRIS slightly exceeds 1%. Future controlled studies focusing on evaluating whether propofol manifests the derangements of critical illness more frequently than other sedatives will need to be large. These studies should also investigate the mechanism(s) and risk factors for PRIS. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2784401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27844012009-11-27 Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study Roberts, Russel J Barletta, Jeffrey F Fong, Jeffrey J Schumaker, Greg Kuper, Philip J Papadopoulos, Stella Yogaratnam, Dinesh Kendall, Elise Xamplas, Renee Gerlach, Anthony T Szumita, Paul M Anger, Kevin E Arpino, Paul A Voils, Stacey A Grgurich, Philip Ruthazer, Robin Devlin, John W Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: While propofol is associated with an infusion syndrome (PRIS) that may cause death, the incidence of PRIS is unknown. Determining the incidence of PRIS and the frequency of PRIS-related clinical manifestations are key steps prior to the completion of any controlled studies investigating PRIS. This prospective, multicenter study sought to determine the incidence of PRIS and PRIS-related clinical manifestations in a large cohort of critically ill adults prescribed propofol. METHODS: Critically ill adults from 11 academic medical centers administered an infusion of propofol for [>/=] 24 hours were monitored at baseline and then on a daily basis until propofol was discontinued for the presence of 11 different PRIS-associated clinical manifestations and risk factors derived from 83 published case reports of PRIS. RESULTS: Among 1017 patients [medical (35%), neurosurgical (25%)], PRIS (defined as metabolic acidosis plus cardiac dysfunction and [>/=] 1 of: rhabdomyolysis, hypertriglyceridemia or renal failure occurring after the start of propofol therapy) developed in 11 (1.1%) patients an average of 3 (1-6) [median (range)] days after the start of propofol. While most (91%) of the patients who developed PRIS were receiving a vasopressor (80% initiated after the start of propofol therapy), few received a propofol dose >83 mcg/kg/min (18%) or died (18%). Compared to the 1006 patients who did not develop PRIS, the APACHE II score (25 +/- 6 vs 20 +/- 7, P = 0.01) was greater in patients with PRIS but both the duration of propofol use (P = 0.43) and ICU length of stay (P = 0.82) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Despite using a conservative definition for PRIS, and only considering new-onset PRIS clinical manifestations, the incidence of PRIS slightly exceeds 1%. Future controlled studies focusing on evaluating whether propofol manifests the derangements of critical illness more frequently than other sedatives will need to be large. These studies should also investigate the mechanism(s) and risk factors for PRIS. BioMed Central 2009 2009-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2784401/ /pubmed/19874582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8145 Text en Copyright ©2009 Roberts et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Roberts, Russel J Barletta, Jeffrey F Fong, Jeffrey J Schumaker, Greg Kuper, Philip J Papadopoulos, Stella Yogaratnam, Dinesh Kendall, Elise Xamplas, Renee Gerlach, Anthony T Szumita, Paul M Anger, Kevin E Arpino, Paul A Voils, Stacey A Grgurich, Philip Ruthazer, Robin Devlin, John W Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study |
title | Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study |
title_full | Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study |
title_fullStr | Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study |
title_short | Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study |
title_sort | incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2784401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19874582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsrusselj incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT barlettajeffreyf incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT fongjeffreyj incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT schumakergreg incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT kuperphilipj incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT papadopoulosstella incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT yogaratnamdinesh incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT kendallelise incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT xamplasrenee incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT gerlachanthonyt incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT szumitapaulm incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT angerkevine incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT arpinopaula incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT voilsstaceya incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT grgurichphilip incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT ruthazerrobin incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT devlinjohnw incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy |