Cargando…

Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study

INTRODUCTION: While propofol is associated with an infusion syndrome (PRIS) that may cause death, the incidence of PRIS is unknown. Determining the incidence of PRIS and the frequency of PRIS-related clinical manifestations are key steps prior to the completion of any controlled studies investigatin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Russel J, Barletta, Jeffrey F, Fong, Jeffrey J, Schumaker, Greg, Kuper, Philip J, Papadopoulos, Stella, Yogaratnam, Dinesh, Kendall, Elise, Xamplas, Renee, Gerlach, Anthony T, Szumita, Paul M, Anger, Kevin E, Arpino, Paul A, Voils, Stacey A, Grgurich, Philip, Ruthazer, Robin, Devlin, John W
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2784401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19874582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8145
_version_ 1782174741885353984
author Roberts, Russel J
Barletta, Jeffrey F
Fong, Jeffrey J
Schumaker, Greg
Kuper, Philip J
Papadopoulos, Stella
Yogaratnam, Dinesh
Kendall, Elise
Xamplas, Renee
Gerlach, Anthony T
Szumita, Paul M
Anger, Kevin E
Arpino, Paul A
Voils, Stacey A
Grgurich, Philip
Ruthazer, Robin
Devlin, John W
author_facet Roberts, Russel J
Barletta, Jeffrey F
Fong, Jeffrey J
Schumaker, Greg
Kuper, Philip J
Papadopoulos, Stella
Yogaratnam, Dinesh
Kendall, Elise
Xamplas, Renee
Gerlach, Anthony T
Szumita, Paul M
Anger, Kevin E
Arpino, Paul A
Voils, Stacey A
Grgurich, Philip
Ruthazer, Robin
Devlin, John W
author_sort Roberts, Russel J
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While propofol is associated with an infusion syndrome (PRIS) that may cause death, the incidence of PRIS is unknown. Determining the incidence of PRIS and the frequency of PRIS-related clinical manifestations are key steps prior to the completion of any controlled studies investigating PRIS. This prospective, multicenter study sought to determine the incidence of PRIS and PRIS-related clinical manifestations in a large cohort of critically ill adults prescribed propofol. METHODS: Critically ill adults from 11 academic medical centers administered an infusion of propofol for [>/=] 24 hours were monitored at baseline and then on a daily basis until propofol was discontinued for the presence of 11 different PRIS-associated clinical manifestations and risk factors derived from 83 published case reports of PRIS. RESULTS: Among 1017 patients [medical (35%), neurosurgical (25%)], PRIS (defined as metabolic acidosis plus cardiac dysfunction and [>/=] 1 of: rhabdomyolysis, hypertriglyceridemia or renal failure occurring after the start of propofol therapy) developed in 11 (1.1%) patients an average of 3 (1-6) [median (range)] days after the start of propofol. While most (91%) of the patients who developed PRIS were receiving a vasopressor (80% initiated after the start of propofol therapy), few received a propofol dose >83 mcg/kg/min (18%) or died (18%). Compared to the 1006 patients who did not develop PRIS, the APACHE II score (25 +/- 6 vs 20 +/- 7, P = 0.01) was greater in patients with PRIS but both the duration of propofol use (P = 0.43) and ICU length of stay (P = 0.82) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Despite using a conservative definition for PRIS, and only considering new-onset PRIS clinical manifestations, the incidence of PRIS slightly exceeds 1%. Future controlled studies focusing on evaluating whether propofol manifests the derangements of critical illness more frequently than other sedatives will need to be large. These studies should also investigate the mechanism(s) and risk factors for PRIS.
format Text
id pubmed-2784401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27844012009-11-27 Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study Roberts, Russel J Barletta, Jeffrey F Fong, Jeffrey J Schumaker, Greg Kuper, Philip J Papadopoulos, Stella Yogaratnam, Dinesh Kendall, Elise Xamplas, Renee Gerlach, Anthony T Szumita, Paul M Anger, Kevin E Arpino, Paul A Voils, Stacey A Grgurich, Philip Ruthazer, Robin Devlin, John W Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: While propofol is associated with an infusion syndrome (PRIS) that may cause death, the incidence of PRIS is unknown. Determining the incidence of PRIS and the frequency of PRIS-related clinical manifestations are key steps prior to the completion of any controlled studies investigating PRIS. This prospective, multicenter study sought to determine the incidence of PRIS and PRIS-related clinical manifestations in a large cohort of critically ill adults prescribed propofol. METHODS: Critically ill adults from 11 academic medical centers administered an infusion of propofol for [>/=] 24 hours were monitored at baseline and then on a daily basis until propofol was discontinued for the presence of 11 different PRIS-associated clinical manifestations and risk factors derived from 83 published case reports of PRIS. RESULTS: Among 1017 patients [medical (35%), neurosurgical (25%)], PRIS (defined as metabolic acidosis plus cardiac dysfunction and [>/=] 1 of: rhabdomyolysis, hypertriglyceridemia or renal failure occurring after the start of propofol therapy) developed in 11 (1.1%) patients an average of 3 (1-6) [median (range)] days after the start of propofol. While most (91%) of the patients who developed PRIS were receiving a vasopressor (80% initiated after the start of propofol therapy), few received a propofol dose >83 mcg/kg/min (18%) or died (18%). Compared to the 1006 patients who did not develop PRIS, the APACHE II score (25 +/- 6 vs 20 +/- 7, P = 0.01) was greater in patients with PRIS but both the duration of propofol use (P = 0.43) and ICU length of stay (P = 0.82) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Despite using a conservative definition for PRIS, and only considering new-onset PRIS clinical manifestations, the incidence of PRIS slightly exceeds 1%. Future controlled studies focusing on evaluating whether propofol manifests the derangements of critical illness more frequently than other sedatives will need to be large. These studies should also investigate the mechanism(s) and risk factors for PRIS. BioMed Central 2009 2009-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2784401/ /pubmed/19874582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8145 Text en Copyright ©2009 Roberts et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Roberts, Russel J
Barletta, Jeffrey F
Fong, Jeffrey J
Schumaker, Greg
Kuper, Philip J
Papadopoulos, Stella
Yogaratnam, Dinesh
Kendall, Elise
Xamplas, Renee
Gerlach, Anthony T
Szumita, Paul M
Anger, Kevin E
Arpino, Paul A
Voils, Stacey A
Grgurich, Philip
Ruthazer, Robin
Devlin, John W
Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study
title Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study
title_full Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study
title_fullStr Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study
title_short Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study
title_sort incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2784401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19874582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8145
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsrusselj incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT barlettajeffreyf incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT fongjeffreyj incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT schumakergreg incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT kuperphilipj incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT papadopoulosstella incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT yogaratnamdinesh incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT kendallelise incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT xamplasrenee incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT gerlachanthonyt incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT szumitapaulm incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT angerkevine incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT arpinopaula incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT voilsstaceya incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT grgurichphilip incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT ruthazerrobin incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT devlinjohnw incidenceofpropofolrelatedinfusionsyndromeincriticallyilladultsaprospectivemulticenterstudy