Cargando…

Influence of involvement of anterior leaflet versus posterior leaflet on residual regurgitation as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse

BACKGROUND: Repair of anterior leaflet prolapse is technically more challenging and this might influence outcomes as compared to the repair of posterior leaflet prolapse in patients undergoing surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. We investigated the association of anterior leaflet prolapse w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sulcaj, Laureta, Rizza, Antonio, Glauber, Mattia, Trianni, Giuseppe, Palmieri, Cataldo, Ravani, Marcello, Dibra, Alban, Maffei, Stefano, Berti, Sergio
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2784438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19922602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-7-54
_version_ 1782174745194659840
author Sulcaj, Laureta
Rizza, Antonio
Glauber, Mattia
Trianni, Giuseppe
Palmieri, Cataldo
Ravani, Marcello
Dibra, Alban
Maffei, Stefano
Berti, Sergio
author_facet Sulcaj, Laureta
Rizza, Antonio
Glauber, Mattia
Trianni, Giuseppe
Palmieri, Cataldo
Ravani, Marcello
Dibra, Alban
Maffei, Stefano
Berti, Sergio
author_sort Sulcaj, Laureta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Repair of anterior leaflet prolapse is technically more challenging and this might influence outcomes as compared to the repair of posterior leaflet prolapse in patients undergoing surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. We investigated the association of anterior leaflet prolapse with minor residual mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) who underwent valve repair. METHODS: Eligible for this study were consecutive patients with severe MR due to MVP, who underwent mitral valve repair with residual MR by postpump transesophageal echocardiography ≤2+ during a 20-month period at Pasquinucci Hospital, Massa. Patients undergoing other cardiovascular surgical interventions were excluded. Two groups were defined according to the involvement of mitral valve leaflets: group 1, consisting of patients with anterior leaflet prolapse (isolated or not); and group 2, consisting of patients with isolated posterior leaflet prolapse. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (18 in group 1 and 52 in group 2) were analyzed. Patients in group 2 were younger than those in group 1, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.052). There were no significant differences between the 2 study groups with respect to other variables. The proportion of patients with residual MR 1+/2+ was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (61.1% vs. 32.7%, respectively; P = 0.034). In a logistic regression model, anterior leaflet prolapse was an independent predictor of residual MR 1+/2+ (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 14.04; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In our study population, patients with anterior leaflet prolapse had a higher proportion of residual MR 1+/2+ as compared to those with posterior leaflet prolapse after repair of mitral valve.
format Text
id pubmed-2784438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27844382009-11-27 Influence of involvement of anterior leaflet versus posterior leaflet on residual regurgitation as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse Sulcaj, Laureta Rizza, Antonio Glauber, Mattia Trianni, Giuseppe Palmieri, Cataldo Ravani, Marcello Dibra, Alban Maffei, Stefano Berti, Sergio Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Repair of anterior leaflet prolapse is technically more challenging and this might influence outcomes as compared to the repair of posterior leaflet prolapse in patients undergoing surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. We investigated the association of anterior leaflet prolapse with minor residual mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) who underwent valve repair. METHODS: Eligible for this study were consecutive patients with severe MR due to MVP, who underwent mitral valve repair with residual MR by postpump transesophageal echocardiography ≤2+ during a 20-month period at Pasquinucci Hospital, Massa. Patients undergoing other cardiovascular surgical interventions were excluded. Two groups were defined according to the involvement of mitral valve leaflets: group 1, consisting of patients with anterior leaflet prolapse (isolated or not); and group 2, consisting of patients with isolated posterior leaflet prolapse. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (18 in group 1 and 52 in group 2) were analyzed. Patients in group 2 were younger than those in group 1, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.052). There were no significant differences between the 2 study groups with respect to other variables. The proportion of patients with residual MR 1+/2+ was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (61.1% vs. 32.7%, respectively; P = 0.034). In a logistic regression model, anterior leaflet prolapse was an independent predictor of residual MR 1+/2+ (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 14.04; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In our study population, patients with anterior leaflet prolapse had a higher proportion of residual MR 1+/2+ as compared to those with posterior leaflet prolapse after repair of mitral valve. BioMed Central 2009-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2784438/ /pubmed/19922602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-7-54 Text en Copyright ©2009 Sulcaj et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Sulcaj, Laureta
Rizza, Antonio
Glauber, Mattia
Trianni, Giuseppe
Palmieri, Cataldo
Ravani, Marcello
Dibra, Alban
Maffei, Stefano
Berti, Sergio
Influence of involvement of anterior leaflet versus posterior leaflet on residual regurgitation as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse
title Influence of involvement of anterior leaflet versus posterior leaflet on residual regurgitation as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse
title_full Influence of involvement of anterior leaflet versus posterior leaflet on residual regurgitation as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse
title_fullStr Influence of involvement of anterior leaflet versus posterior leaflet on residual regurgitation as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Influence of involvement of anterior leaflet versus posterior leaflet on residual regurgitation as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse
title_short Influence of involvement of anterior leaflet versus posterior leaflet on residual regurgitation as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse
title_sort influence of involvement of anterior leaflet versus posterior leaflet on residual regurgitation as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2784438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19922602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-7-54
work_keys_str_mv AT sulcajlaureta influenceofinvolvementofanteriorleafletversusposteriorleafletonresidualregurgitationasassessedbytransesophagealechocardiographyinpatientsundergoingvalverepairformitralregurgitationduetomitralvalveprolapse
AT rizzaantonio influenceofinvolvementofanteriorleafletversusposteriorleafletonresidualregurgitationasassessedbytransesophagealechocardiographyinpatientsundergoingvalverepairformitralregurgitationduetomitralvalveprolapse
AT glaubermattia influenceofinvolvementofanteriorleafletversusposteriorleafletonresidualregurgitationasassessedbytransesophagealechocardiographyinpatientsundergoingvalverepairformitralregurgitationduetomitralvalveprolapse
AT triannigiuseppe influenceofinvolvementofanteriorleafletversusposteriorleafletonresidualregurgitationasassessedbytransesophagealechocardiographyinpatientsundergoingvalverepairformitralregurgitationduetomitralvalveprolapse
AT palmiericataldo influenceofinvolvementofanteriorleafletversusposteriorleafletonresidualregurgitationasassessedbytransesophagealechocardiographyinpatientsundergoingvalverepairformitralregurgitationduetomitralvalveprolapse
AT ravanimarcello influenceofinvolvementofanteriorleafletversusposteriorleafletonresidualregurgitationasassessedbytransesophagealechocardiographyinpatientsundergoingvalverepairformitralregurgitationduetomitralvalveprolapse
AT dibraalban influenceofinvolvementofanteriorleafletversusposteriorleafletonresidualregurgitationasassessedbytransesophagealechocardiographyinpatientsundergoingvalverepairformitralregurgitationduetomitralvalveprolapse
AT maffeistefano influenceofinvolvementofanteriorleafletversusposteriorleafletonresidualregurgitationasassessedbytransesophagealechocardiographyinpatientsundergoingvalverepairformitralregurgitationduetomitralvalveprolapse
AT bertisergio influenceofinvolvementofanteriorleafletversusposteriorleafletonresidualregurgitationasassessedbytransesophagealechocardiographyinpatientsundergoingvalverepairformitralregurgitationduetomitralvalveprolapse