Cargando…

Does risk equalization reduce the viability of voluntary deductibles?

Theoretically, a risk avers consumer takes a deductible if the premium rebate (far) exceeds his/her expected out-of-pocket expenditures. In the absence of risk equalization, insurers are able to offer high rebates because those who select into a deductible plan have below-average expenses. This pape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Kleef, R. C., Beck, K., van de Ven, W. P. M. M., van Vliet, R. C. J. A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2784522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17431767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10754-007-9011-1
_version_ 1782174762505601024
author van Kleef, R. C.
Beck, K.
van de Ven, W. P. M. M.
van Vliet, R. C. J. A.
author_facet van Kleef, R. C.
Beck, K.
van de Ven, W. P. M. M.
van Vliet, R. C. J. A.
author_sort van Kleef, R. C.
collection PubMed
description Theoretically, a risk avers consumer takes a deductible if the premium rebate (far) exceeds his/her expected out-of-pocket expenditures. In the absence of risk equalization, insurers are able to offer high rebates because those who select into a deductible plan have below-average expenses. This paper shows that, for high deductibles, such rebates cannot be offered if risk equalization would “perfectly” adjust for the effect of self selection. Since the main goal of user charges is to reduce moral hazard, some effect of self selection on the premium rebate can be justified to increase the viability of voluntary deductibles.
format Text
id pubmed-2784522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27845222009-12-04 Does risk equalization reduce the viability of voluntary deductibles? van Kleef, R. C. Beck, K. van de Ven, W. P. M. M. van Vliet, R. C. J. A. Int J Health Care Finance Econ Article Theoretically, a risk avers consumer takes a deductible if the premium rebate (far) exceeds his/her expected out-of-pocket expenditures. In the absence of risk equalization, insurers are able to offer high rebates because those who select into a deductible plan have below-average expenses. This paper shows that, for high deductibles, such rebates cannot be offered if risk equalization would “perfectly” adjust for the effect of self selection. Since the main goal of user charges is to reduce moral hazard, some effect of self selection on the premium rebate can be justified to increase the viability of voluntary deductibles. Springer-Verlag 2007-04-13 2007-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2784522/ /pubmed/17431767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10754-007-9011-1 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007
spellingShingle Article
van Kleef, R. C.
Beck, K.
van de Ven, W. P. M. M.
van Vliet, R. C. J. A.
Does risk equalization reduce the viability of voluntary deductibles?
title Does risk equalization reduce the viability of voluntary deductibles?
title_full Does risk equalization reduce the viability of voluntary deductibles?
title_fullStr Does risk equalization reduce the viability of voluntary deductibles?
title_full_unstemmed Does risk equalization reduce the viability of voluntary deductibles?
title_short Does risk equalization reduce the viability of voluntary deductibles?
title_sort does risk equalization reduce the viability of voluntary deductibles?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2784522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17431767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10754-007-9011-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vankleefrc doesriskequalizationreducetheviabilityofvoluntarydeductibles
AT beckk doesriskequalizationreducetheviabilityofvoluntarydeductibles
AT vandevenwpmm doesriskequalizationreducetheviabilityofvoluntarydeductibles
AT vanvlietrcja doesriskequalizationreducetheviabilityofvoluntarydeductibles