Cargando…

Cost Analysis of the Dutch Obstetric System: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth - a prospective non-randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, pregnant women without medical complications can decide where they want to give birth, at home or in a short-stay hospital setting with a midwife. However, a decrease in the home birth rate during the last decennium may have raised the societal costs of giving birth....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hendrix, Marijke JC, Evers, Silvia MAA, Basten, Marloes CM, Nijhuis, Jan G, Severens, Johan L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2784768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19925673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-211
_version_ 1782174780772843520
author Hendrix, Marijke JC
Evers, Silvia MAA
Basten, Marloes CM
Nijhuis, Jan G
Severens, Johan L
author_facet Hendrix, Marijke JC
Evers, Silvia MAA
Basten, Marloes CM
Nijhuis, Jan G
Severens, Johan L
author_sort Hendrix, Marijke JC
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, pregnant women without medical complications can decide where they want to give birth, at home or in a short-stay hospital setting with a midwife. However, a decrease in the home birth rate during the last decennium may have raised the societal costs of giving birth. The objective of this study is to compare the societal costs of home births with those of births in a short-stay hospital setting. METHODS: This study is a cost analysis based on the findings of a multicenter prospective non-randomised study comparing two groups of nulliparous women with different preferences for where to give birth, at home or in a short-stay hospital setting. Data were collected using cost diaries, questionnaires and birth registration forms. Analysis of the data is divided into a base case analysis and a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In the group of home births, the total societal costs associated with giving birth at home were €3,695 (per birth), compared with €3,950 per birth in the group for short-stay hospital births. Statistically significant differences between both groups were found regarding the following cost categories 'Cost of contacts with health care professionals during delivery' (€138.38 vs. €87.94, -50 (2.5-97.5 percentile range (PR)-76;-25), p < 0.05), 'cost of maternity care at home' (€1,551.69 vs. €1,240.69, -311 (PR -485; -150), p < 0.05) and 'cost of hospitalisation mother' (€707.77 vs. 959.06, 251 (PR 69;433), p < 0.05). The highest costs are for hospitalisation (41% of all costs). Because there is a relatively high amount of (partly) missing data, a sensitivity analysis was performed, in which all missing data were included in the analysis by means of general mean substitution. In the sensitivity analysis, the total costs associated with home birth are €4,364 per birth, and €4,541 per birth for short-stay hospital births. CONCLUSION: The total costs associated with pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum care are comparable for home birth and short-stay hospital birth. The most important differences in costs between the home birth group and the short-stay hospital birth group are associated with maternity care assistance, hospitalisation, and travelling costs.
format Text
id pubmed-2784768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27847682009-11-28 Cost Analysis of the Dutch Obstetric System: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth - a prospective non-randomised controlled study Hendrix, Marijke JC Evers, Silvia MAA Basten, Marloes CM Nijhuis, Jan G Severens, Johan L BMC Health Serv Res Research article BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, pregnant women without medical complications can decide where they want to give birth, at home or in a short-stay hospital setting with a midwife. However, a decrease in the home birth rate during the last decennium may have raised the societal costs of giving birth. The objective of this study is to compare the societal costs of home births with those of births in a short-stay hospital setting. METHODS: This study is a cost analysis based on the findings of a multicenter prospective non-randomised study comparing two groups of nulliparous women with different preferences for where to give birth, at home or in a short-stay hospital setting. Data were collected using cost diaries, questionnaires and birth registration forms. Analysis of the data is divided into a base case analysis and a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In the group of home births, the total societal costs associated with giving birth at home were €3,695 (per birth), compared with €3,950 per birth in the group for short-stay hospital births. Statistically significant differences between both groups were found regarding the following cost categories 'Cost of contacts with health care professionals during delivery' (€138.38 vs. €87.94, -50 (2.5-97.5 percentile range (PR)-76;-25), p < 0.05), 'cost of maternity care at home' (€1,551.69 vs. €1,240.69, -311 (PR -485; -150), p < 0.05) and 'cost of hospitalisation mother' (€707.77 vs. 959.06, 251 (PR 69;433), p < 0.05). The highest costs are for hospitalisation (41% of all costs). Because there is a relatively high amount of (partly) missing data, a sensitivity analysis was performed, in which all missing data were included in the analysis by means of general mean substitution. In the sensitivity analysis, the total costs associated with home birth are €4,364 per birth, and €4,541 per birth for short-stay hospital births. CONCLUSION: The total costs associated with pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum care are comparable for home birth and short-stay hospital birth. The most important differences in costs between the home birth group and the short-stay hospital birth group are associated with maternity care assistance, hospitalisation, and travelling costs. BioMed Central 2009-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2784768/ /pubmed/19925673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-211 Text en Copyright ©2009 Hendrix et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Hendrix, Marijke JC
Evers, Silvia MAA
Basten, Marloes CM
Nijhuis, Jan G
Severens, Johan L
Cost Analysis of the Dutch Obstetric System: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth - a prospective non-randomised controlled study
title Cost Analysis of the Dutch Obstetric System: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth - a prospective non-randomised controlled study
title_full Cost Analysis of the Dutch Obstetric System: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth - a prospective non-randomised controlled study
title_fullStr Cost Analysis of the Dutch Obstetric System: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth - a prospective non-randomised controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Cost Analysis of the Dutch Obstetric System: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth - a prospective non-randomised controlled study
title_short Cost Analysis of the Dutch Obstetric System: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth - a prospective non-randomised controlled study
title_sort cost analysis of the dutch obstetric system: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth - a prospective non-randomised controlled study
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2784768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19925673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-211
work_keys_str_mv AT hendrixmarijkejc costanalysisofthedutchobstetricsystemlowrisknulliparouswomenpreferringhomeorshortstayhospitalbirthaprospectivenonrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT everssilviamaa costanalysisofthedutchobstetricsystemlowrisknulliparouswomenpreferringhomeorshortstayhospitalbirthaprospectivenonrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT bastenmarloescm costanalysisofthedutchobstetricsystemlowrisknulliparouswomenpreferringhomeorshortstayhospitalbirthaprospectivenonrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT nijhuisjang costanalysisofthedutchobstetricsystemlowrisknulliparouswomenpreferringhomeorshortstayhospitalbirthaprospectivenonrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT severensjohanl costanalysisofthedutchobstetricsystemlowrisknulliparouswomenpreferringhomeorshortstayhospitalbirthaprospectivenonrandomisedcontrolledstudy