Cargando…

Unconsciously Perceived Fear in Peripheral Vision Alerts the Limbic System: A MEG Study

BACKGROUND: In ecological situations, threatening stimuli often come out from the peripheral vision. Such aggressive messages must trigger rapid attention to the periphery to allow a fast and adapted motor reaction. Several clues converge to hypothesize that peripheral danger presentation can trigge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayle, Dimitri J., Henaff, Marie-Anne, Krolak-Salmon, Pierre
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2785432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20011048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008207
_version_ 1782174815964102656
author Bayle, Dimitri J.
Henaff, Marie-Anne
Krolak-Salmon, Pierre
author_facet Bayle, Dimitri J.
Henaff, Marie-Anne
Krolak-Salmon, Pierre
author_sort Bayle, Dimitri J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In ecological situations, threatening stimuli often come out from the peripheral vision. Such aggressive messages must trigger rapid attention to the periphery to allow a fast and adapted motor reaction. Several clues converge to hypothesize that peripheral danger presentation can trigger off a fast arousal network potentially independent of the consciousness spot. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In the present MEG study, spatio-temporal dynamics of the neural processing of danger related stimuli were explored as a function of the stimuli position in the visual field. Fearful and neutral faces were briefly presented in the central or peripheral visual field, and were followed by target faces stimuli. An event-related beamformer source analysis model was applied in three time windows following the first face presentations: 80 to 130 ms, 140 to 190 ms, and 210 to 260 ms. The frontal lobe and the right internal temporal lobe part, including the amygdala, reacted as soon as 80 ms of latency to fear occurring in the peripheral vision. For central presentation, fearful faces evoked the classical neuronal activity along the occipito-temporal visual pathway between 140 and 190 ms. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the high spatio-temporal resolution of MEG allowed disclosing a fast response of a network involving medial temporal and frontal structures in the processing of fear related stimuli occurring unconsciously in the peripheral visual field. Whereas centrally presented stimuli are precisely processed by the ventral occipito-temporal cortex, the related-to-danger stimuli appearing in the peripheral visual field are more efficient to produce a fast automatic alert response possibly conveyed by subcortical structures.
format Text
id pubmed-2785432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27854322009-12-10 Unconsciously Perceived Fear in Peripheral Vision Alerts the Limbic System: A MEG Study Bayle, Dimitri J. Henaff, Marie-Anne Krolak-Salmon, Pierre PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In ecological situations, threatening stimuli often come out from the peripheral vision. Such aggressive messages must trigger rapid attention to the periphery to allow a fast and adapted motor reaction. Several clues converge to hypothesize that peripheral danger presentation can trigger off a fast arousal network potentially independent of the consciousness spot. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In the present MEG study, spatio-temporal dynamics of the neural processing of danger related stimuli were explored as a function of the stimuli position in the visual field. Fearful and neutral faces were briefly presented in the central or peripheral visual field, and were followed by target faces stimuli. An event-related beamformer source analysis model was applied in three time windows following the first face presentations: 80 to 130 ms, 140 to 190 ms, and 210 to 260 ms. The frontal lobe and the right internal temporal lobe part, including the amygdala, reacted as soon as 80 ms of latency to fear occurring in the peripheral vision. For central presentation, fearful faces evoked the classical neuronal activity along the occipito-temporal visual pathway between 140 and 190 ms. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the high spatio-temporal resolution of MEG allowed disclosing a fast response of a network involving medial temporal and frontal structures in the processing of fear related stimuli occurring unconsciously in the peripheral visual field. Whereas centrally presented stimuli are precisely processed by the ventral occipito-temporal cortex, the related-to-danger stimuli appearing in the peripheral visual field are more efficient to produce a fast automatic alert response possibly conveyed by subcortical structures. Public Library of Science 2009-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2785432/ /pubmed/20011048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008207 Text en Bayle et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bayle, Dimitri J.
Henaff, Marie-Anne
Krolak-Salmon, Pierre
Unconsciously Perceived Fear in Peripheral Vision Alerts the Limbic System: A MEG Study
title Unconsciously Perceived Fear in Peripheral Vision Alerts the Limbic System: A MEG Study
title_full Unconsciously Perceived Fear in Peripheral Vision Alerts the Limbic System: A MEG Study
title_fullStr Unconsciously Perceived Fear in Peripheral Vision Alerts the Limbic System: A MEG Study
title_full_unstemmed Unconsciously Perceived Fear in Peripheral Vision Alerts the Limbic System: A MEG Study
title_short Unconsciously Perceived Fear in Peripheral Vision Alerts the Limbic System: A MEG Study
title_sort unconsciously perceived fear in peripheral vision alerts the limbic system: a meg study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2785432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20011048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008207
work_keys_str_mv AT bayledimitrij unconsciouslyperceivedfearinperipheralvisionalertsthelimbicsystemamegstudy
AT henaffmarieanne unconsciouslyperceivedfearinperipheralvisionalertsthelimbicsystemamegstudy
AT krolaksalmonpierre unconsciouslyperceivedfearinperipheralvisionalertsthelimbicsystemamegstudy