Cargando…
The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty
INTRODUCTION: Patient's expectations are variably reported to influence self-rated outcome and satisfaction after medical treatment; this prospective study examined which of the following was the most important unique determinant of global outcome/satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2787271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19772556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar2811 |
_version_ | 1782174896599597056 |
---|---|
author | Mannion, Anne F Kämpfen, Stephane Munzinger, Urs Kramers-de Quervain, Ines |
author_facet | Mannion, Anne F Kämpfen, Stephane Munzinger, Urs Kramers-de Quervain, Ines |
author_sort | Mannion, Anne F |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patient's expectations are variably reported to influence self-rated outcome and satisfaction after medical treatment; this prospective study examined which of the following was the most important unique determinant of global outcome/satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA): baseline expectations; fulfilment of expectations; or current symptoms and function. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (age, 67 ± 9 years) completed a questionnaire about their expectations regarding months until full recovery, pain, and limitations in everyday activities after TKA surgery. Two years postoperatively, they were asked what the reality was for each of these domains, and rated the global outcome and satisfaction with surgery. Multivariable regression analyses using forward conditional selection of variables (and controlling for age, gender, other joint problems) identified the most significant determinants of outcome. RESULTS: Patients significantly underestimated the time for full recovery (expected 4.7 ± 2.8 months, recalled actual time, 6.1 ± 3.7 months; P = 0.005). They were also overly optimistic about the likelihood of being pain-free (85% expected it, 43% were; P < 0.05) and of not being limited in usual activities (52% expected it, 20% were; P < 0.05). Global outcomes were 46.2% excellent, 41.3% good, 10.6% fair and 1.9% poor. In multivariable regression, expectations did not make a significant unique contribution to explaining the variance in outcome/satisfaction; together with other joint problems, knee pain and function at 2 years postoperation predicted global outcome, and knee pain at 2 years predicted satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In this group, preoperative expectations of TKA surgery were overly optimistic. The routine analysis of patient-orientated outcomes in practice should assist the surgeon to convey more realistic expectations to the patient during the preoperative consultation. In multivariable regression, expectations did not predict global outcome/satisfaction; the most important determinants were other joint problems and the patient's pain and functional status 2 years postoperatively. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2787271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27872712009-12-02 The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty Mannion, Anne F Kämpfen, Stephane Munzinger, Urs Kramers-de Quervain, Ines Arthritis Res Ther Research article INTRODUCTION: Patient's expectations are variably reported to influence self-rated outcome and satisfaction after medical treatment; this prospective study examined which of the following was the most important unique determinant of global outcome/satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA): baseline expectations; fulfilment of expectations; or current symptoms and function. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (age, 67 ± 9 years) completed a questionnaire about their expectations regarding months until full recovery, pain, and limitations in everyday activities after TKA surgery. Two years postoperatively, they were asked what the reality was for each of these domains, and rated the global outcome and satisfaction with surgery. Multivariable regression analyses using forward conditional selection of variables (and controlling for age, gender, other joint problems) identified the most significant determinants of outcome. RESULTS: Patients significantly underestimated the time for full recovery (expected 4.7 ± 2.8 months, recalled actual time, 6.1 ± 3.7 months; P = 0.005). They were also overly optimistic about the likelihood of being pain-free (85% expected it, 43% were; P < 0.05) and of not being limited in usual activities (52% expected it, 20% were; P < 0.05). Global outcomes were 46.2% excellent, 41.3% good, 10.6% fair and 1.9% poor. In multivariable regression, expectations did not make a significant unique contribution to explaining the variance in outcome/satisfaction; together with other joint problems, knee pain and function at 2 years postoperation predicted global outcome, and knee pain at 2 years predicted satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In this group, preoperative expectations of TKA surgery were overly optimistic. The routine analysis of patient-orientated outcomes in practice should assist the surgeon to convey more realistic expectations to the patient during the preoperative consultation. In multivariable regression, expectations did not predict global outcome/satisfaction; the most important determinants were other joint problems and the patient's pain and functional status 2 years postoperatively. BioMed Central 2009 2009-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2787271/ /pubmed/19772556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar2811 Text en Copyright ©2009 Mannion et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Mannion, Anne F Kämpfen, Stephane Munzinger, Urs Kramers-de Quervain, Ines The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty |
title | The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty |
title_full | The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty |
title_short | The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty |
title_sort | role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2787271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19772556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar2811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mannionannef theroleofpatientexpectationsinpredictingoutcomeaftertotalkneearthroplasty AT kampfenstephane theroleofpatientexpectationsinpredictingoutcomeaftertotalkneearthroplasty AT munzingerurs theroleofpatientexpectationsinpredictingoutcomeaftertotalkneearthroplasty AT kramersdequervainines theroleofpatientexpectationsinpredictingoutcomeaftertotalkneearthroplasty AT mannionannef roleofpatientexpectationsinpredictingoutcomeaftertotalkneearthroplasty AT kampfenstephane roleofpatientexpectationsinpredictingoutcomeaftertotalkneearthroplasty AT munzingerurs roleofpatientexpectationsinpredictingoutcomeaftertotalkneearthroplasty AT kramersdequervainines roleofpatientexpectationsinpredictingoutcomeaftertotalkneearthroplasty |