Cargando…

Determining a low disease activity threshold for decision to maintain disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment unchanged in rheumatoid arthritis patients

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine a low disease activity threshold - a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) value - for the decision to maintain unchanged disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients, based on expert opinion. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Bandt, Michel, Fautrel, Bruno, Maillefert, Jean Francis, Berthelot, Jean Marie, Combe, Bernard, Flipo, René-Marc, Lioté, Frédéric, Meyer, Olivier, Saraux, Alain, Wendling, Daniel, Le Loët, Xavier, Guillemin, Francis
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2787280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19849865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar2836
_version_ 1782174898724012032
author de Bandt, Michel
Fautrel, Bruno
Maillefert, Jean Francis
Berthelot, Jean Marie
Combe, Bernard
Flipo, René-Marc
Lioté, Frédéric
Meyer, Olivier
Saraux, Alain
Wendling, Daniel
Le Loët, Xavier
Guillemin, Francis
author_facet de Bandt, Michel
Fautrel, Bruno
Maillefert, Jean Francis
Berthelot, Jean Marie
Combe, Bernard
Flipo, René-Marc
Lioté, Frédéric
Meyer, Olivier
Saraux, Alain
Wendling, Daniel
Le Loët, Xavier
Guillemin, Francis
author_sort de Bandt, Michel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine a low disease activity threshold - a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) value - for the decision to maintain unchanged disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients, based on expert opinion. METHODS: Nine hundred and sixty-seven case scenarios with various levels for each component of the DAS28 (resulting in a disease activity score between 2 and 3.2) were presented to 44 panelists. For each scenario, panelists had to decide whether or not DMARD treatment (excluding steroids) could be maintained unchanged. In each scenario, for decision, the participants were given the DAS28 parameters, without knowledge of the resultant DAS28. The relationship between panelists' decision, DAS28 value, and components of the score were analysed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Each panelist analysed 160 randomised scenarios. Intra-rater and inter-rater reproducibility were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-four panelists participated in the study. Inter-panelist agreement was good (κ = 0.63; 95% confidence interval = 0.61 to 0.65). Intra-panelist agreement was excellent (κ = 0.87; 95% confidence interval = 0.82 to 0.92). Quasi-perfect agreement was observed for DAS28 ≤ 2.4, less pronounced between 2.5 and 2.9, and almost no agreement for DAS28 > 3.0. For values below 2.5, panelists agreed to maintain unchanged DMARDs; for values above 2.5, discrepancies occurred more frequently as the DAS28 value increased. Multivariate analysis confirmed the relationship between panelist's decision, DAS28 value and components of the DAS28. Between DAS28 of 2.4 and 3.2, a major determinant for panelists' decision was swollen joint count. Female and public practice physicians decided more often to maintain treatment unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: As a conclusion, panelists suggested that in clinical practice there is no need to change DMARD treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients with DAS28 ≤ 2.4.
format Text
id pubmed-2787280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27872802009-12-02 Determining a low disease activity threshold for decision to maintain disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment unchanged in rheumatoid arthritis patients de Bandt, Michel Fautrel, Bruno Maillefert, Jean Francis Berthelot, Jean Marie Combe, Bernard Flipo, René-Marc Lioté, Frédéric Meyer, Olivier Saraux, Alain Wendling, Daniel Le Loët, Xavier Guillemin, Francis Arthritis Res Ther Research article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine a low disease activity threshold - a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) value - for the decision to maintain unchanged disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients, based on expert opinion. METHODS: Nine hundred and sixty-seven case scenarios with various levels for each component of the DAS28 (resulting in a disease activity score between 2 and 3.2) were presented to 44 panelists. For each scenario, panelists had to decide whether or not DMARD treatment (excluding steroids) could be maintained unchanged. In each scenario, for decision, the participants were given the DAS28 parameters, without knowledge of the resultant DAS28. The relationship between panelists' decision, DAS28 value, and components of the score were analysed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Each panelist analysed 160 randomised scenarios. Intra-rater and inter-rater reproducibility were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-four panelists participated in the study. Inter-panelist agreement was good (κ = 0.63; 95% confidence interval = 0.61 to 0.65). Intra-panelist agreement was excellent (κ = 0.87; 95% confidence interval = 0.82 to 0.92). Quasi-perfect agreement was observed for DAS28 ≤ 2.4, less pronounced between 2.5 and 2.9, and almost no agreement for DAS28 > 3.0. For values below 2.5, panelists agreed to maintain unchanged DMARDs; for values above 2.5, discrepancies occurred more frequently as the DAS28 value increased. Multivariate analysis confirmed the relationship between panelist's decision, DAS28 value and components of the DAS28. Between DAS28 of 2.4 and 3.2, a major determinant for panelists' decision was swollen joint count. Female and public practice physicians decided more often to maintain treatment unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: As a conclusion, panelists suggested that in clinical practice there is no need to change DMARD treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients with DAS28 ≤ 2.4. BioMed Central 2009 2009-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2787280/ /pubmed/19849865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar2836 Text en Copyright ©2009 de Bandt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
de Bandt, Michel
Fautrel, Bruno
Maillefert, Jean Francis
Berthelot, Jean Marie
Combe, Bernard
Flipo, René-Marc
Lioté, Frédéric
Meyer, Olivier
Saraux, Alain
Wendling, Daniel
Le Loët, Xavier
Guillemin, Francis
Determining a low disease activity threshold for decision to maintain disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment unchanged in rheumatoid arthritis patients
title Determining a low disease activity threshold for decision to maintain disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment unchanged in rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_full Determining a low disease activity threshold for decision to maintain disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment unchanged in rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_fullStr Determining a low disease activity threshold for decision to maintain disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment unchanged in rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_full_unstemmed Determining a low disease activity threshold for decision to maintain disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment unchanged in rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_short Determining a low disease activity threshold for decision to maintain disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment unchanged in rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_sort determining a low disease activity threshold for decision to maintain disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment unchanged in rheumatoid arthritis patients
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2787280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19849865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar2836
work_keys_str_mv AT debandtmichel determiningalowdiseaseactivitythresholdfordecisiontomaintaindiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugtreatmentunchangedinrheumatoidarthritispatients
AT fautrelbruno determiningalowdiseaseactivitythresholdfordecisiontomaintaindiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugtreatmentunchangedinrheumatoidarthritispatients
AT maillefertjeanfrancis determiningalowdiseaseactivitythresholdfordecisiontomaintaindiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugtreatmentunchangedinrheumatoidarthritispatients
AT berthelotjeanmarie determiningalowdiseaseactivitythresholdfordecisiontomaintaindiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugtreatmentunchangedinrheumatoidarthritispatients
AT combebernard determiningalowdiseaseactivitythresholdfordecisiontomaintaindiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugtreatmentunchangedinrheumatoidarthritispatients
AT fliporenemarc determiningalowdiseaseactivitythresholdfordecisiontomaintaindiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugtreatmentunchangedinrheumatoidarthritispatients
AT liotefrederic determiningalowdiseaseactivitythresholdfordecisiontomaintaindiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugtreatmentunchangedinrheumatoidarthritispatients
AT meyerolivier determiningalowdiseaseactivitythresholdfordecisiontomaintaindiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugtreatmentunchangedinrheumatoidarthritispatients
AT sarauxalain determiningalowdiseaseactivitythresholdfordecisiontomaintaindiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugtreatmentunchangedinrheumatoidarthritispatients
AT wendlingdaniel determiningalowdiseaseactivitythresholdfordecisiontomaintaindiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugtreatmentunchangedinrheumatoidarthritispatients
AT leloetxavier determiningalowdiseaseactivitythresholdfordecisiontomaintaindiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugtreatmentunchangedinrheumatoidarthritispatients
AT guilleminfrancis determiningalowdiseaseactivitythresholdfordecisiontomaintaindiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugtreatmentunchangedinrheumatoidarthritispatients