Cargando…
Validation of the IOF quality of life questionnaire for patients with wrist fracture
INTRODUCTION: Wrist fracture causes pain and decreased physical, social and emotional function. The International Osteoporosis Foundation has developed a specific questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with wrist fracture. This questionnaire, including 12 questions, was validated in a m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2788146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19504036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0946-6 |
_version_ | 1782174934896738304 |
---|---|
author | Lips, P. Jameson, K. Bianchi, M. L. Goemaere, S. Boonen, S. Reeve, J. Stepan, J. Johnell, O. van Schoor, N. M. Dennison, E. Kanis, J. A. Cooper, C. |
author_facet | Lips, P. Jameson, K. Bianchi, M. L. Goemaere, S. Boonen, S. Reeve, J. Stepan, J. Johnell, O. van Schoor, N. M. Dennison, E. Kanis, J. A. Cooper, C. |
author_sort | Lips, P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Wrist fracture causes pain and decreased physical, social and emotional function. The International Osteoporosis Foundation has developed a specific questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with wrist fracture. This questionnaire, including 12 questions, was validated in a multicentre study and compared with an osteoporosis-specific questionnaire (Qualeffo-41) and a generic questionnaire (EQ-5D). METHODS: The study included 105 patients with a recent wrist fracture and 74 sex- and age-matched control subjects. The questionnaire was administered as soon as possible after the fracture, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after the fracture. Test–retest reproducibility, internal consistency and sensitivity to change were assessed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results showed adequate repeatability and internal consistency of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) wrist fracture questionnaire. The discriminatory capacity between patients and control subjects was very high, with significant odds ratios for each question and domain. The IOF-wrist fracture questionnaire domain scores showed significant improvement after 3 and 6 months and some improvement from 6 months up to 1 year. The sensitivity to change was much higher for the IOF-wrist fracture total score than for Qualeffo-41 and EQ-5D. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the IOF-wrist fracture questionnaire appears to be a reliable and responsive quality of life questionnaire. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2788146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27881462009-12-04 Validation of the IOF quality of life questionnaire for patients with wrist fracture Lips, P. Jameson, K. Bianchi, M. L. Goemaere, S. Boonen, S. Reeve, J. Stepan, J. Johnell, O. van Schoor, N. M. Dennison, E. Kanis, J. A. Cooper, C. Osteoporos Int Original Article INTRODUCTION: Wrist fracture causes pain and decreased physical, social and emotional function. The International Osteoporosis Foundation has developed a specific questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with wrist fracture. This questionnaire, including 12 questions, was validated in a multicentre study and compared with an osteoporosis-specific questionnaire (Qualeffo-41) and a generic questionnaire (EQ-5D). METHODS: The study included 105 patients with a recent wrist fracture and 74 sex- and age-matched control subjects. The questionnaire was administered as soon as possible after the fracture, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after the fracture. Test–retest reproducibility, internal consistency and sensitivity to change were assessed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results showed adequate repeatability and internal consistency of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) wrist fracture questionnaire. The discriminatory capacity between patients and control subjects was very high, with significant odds ratios for each question and domain. The IOF-wrist fracture questionnaire domain scores showed significant improvement after 3 and 6 months and some improvement from 6 months up to 1 year. The sensitivity to change was much higher for the IOF-wrist fracture total score than for Qualeffo-41 and EQ-5D. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the IOF-wrist fracture questionnaire appears to be a reliable and responsive quality of life questionnaire. Springer-Verlag 2009-06-06 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2788146/ /pubmed/19504036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0946-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lips, P. Jameson, K. Bianchi, M. L. Goemaere, S. Boonen, S. Reeve, J. Stepan, J. Johnell, O. van Schoor, N. M. Dennison, E. Kanis, J. A. Cooper, C. Validation of the IOF quality of life questionnaire for patients with wrist fracture |
title | Validation of the IOF quality of life questionnaire for patients with wrist fracture |
title_full | Validation of the IOF quality of life questionnaire for patients with wrist fracture |
title_fullStr | Validation of the IOF quality of life questionnaire for patients with wrist fracture |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the IOF quality of life questionnaire for patients with wrist fracture |
title_short | Validation of the IOF quality of life questionnaire for patients with wrist fracture |
title_sort | validation of the iof quality of life questionnaire for patients with wrist fracture |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2788146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19504036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0946-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lipsp validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture AT jamesonk validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture AT bianchiml validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture AT goemaeres validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture AT boonens validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture AT reevej validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture AT stepanj validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture AT johnello validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture AT vanschoornm validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture AT dennisone validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture AT kanisja validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture AT cooperc validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture AT validationoftheiofqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithwristfracture |