Cargando…

Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has shown to reduce prostate cancer mortality in the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial. Overdetection and overtreatment are substantial unfavourable side effects with consequent healthca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heijnsdijk, E A M, der Kinderen, A, Wever, E M, Draisma, G, Roobol, M J, de Koning, H J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2788248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19904272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605422
_version_ 1782174952345042944
author Heijnsdijk, E A M
der Kinderen, A
Wever, E M
Draisma, G
Roobol, M J
de Koning, H J
author_facet Heijnsdijk, E A M
der Kinderen, A
Wever, E M
Draisma, G
Roobol, M J
de Koning, H J
author_sort Heijnsdijk, E A M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has shown to reduce prostate cancer mortality in the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial. Overdetection and overtreatment are substantial unfavourable side effects with consequent healthcare costs. In this study the effects of introducing widespread PSA screening is evaluated. METHODS: The MISCAN model was used to simulate prostate cancer growth and detection in a simulated cohort of 100 000 men (European standard population) over 25 years. PSA screening from age 55 to 70 or 75, with 1, 2 and 4-year-intervals is simulated. Number of diagnoses, PSA tests, biopsies, treatments, deaths and corresponding costs for 100 000 men and for United Kingdom and United States are compared. RESULTS: Without screening 2378 men per 100 000 were predicted to be diagnosed with prostate cancer compared with 4956 men after screening at 4-year intervals. By introducing screening, the costs would increase with 100% to €60 695 000. Overdetection is related to 39% of total costs (€23 669 000). Screening until age 75 is relatively most expensive because of the costs of overtreatment. CONCLUSION: Introduction of PSA screening will increase total healthcare costs for prostate cancer substantially, of which the actual screening costs will be a small part.
format Text
id pubmed-2788248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27882482010-12-01 Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer Heijnsdijk, E A M der Kinderen, A Wever, E M Draisma, G Roobol, M J de Koning, H J Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has shown to reduce prostate cancer mortality in the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial. Overdetection and overtreatment are substantial unfavourable side effects with consequent healthcare costs. In this study the effects of introducing widespread PSA screening is evaluated. METHODS: The MISCAN model was used to simulate prostate cancer growth and detection in a simulated cohort of 100 000 men (European standard population) over 25 years. PSA screening from age 55 to 70 or 75, with 1, 2 and 4-year-intervals is simulated. Number of diagnoses, PSA tests, biopsies, treatments, deaths and corresponding costs for 100 000 men and for United Kingdom and United States are compared. RESULTS: Without screening 2378 men per 100 000 were predicted to be diagnosed with prostate cancer compared with 4956 men after screening at 4-year intervals. By introducing screening, the costs would increase with 100% to €60 695 000. Overdetection is related to 39% of total costs (€23 669 000). Screening until age 75 is relatively most expensive because of the costs of overtreatment. CONCLUSION: Introduction of PSA screening will increase total healthcare costs for prostate cancer substantially, of which the actual screening costs will be a small part. Nature Publishing Group 2009-12-01 2009-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2788248/ /pubmed/19904272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605422 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Heijnsdijk, E A M
der Kinderen, A
Wever, E M
Draisma, G
Roobol, M J
de Koning, H J
Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer
title Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer
title_full Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer
title_fullStr Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer
title_short Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer
title_sort overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2788248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19904272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605422
work_keys_str_mv AT heijnsdijkeam overdetectionovertreatmentandcostsinprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancer
AT derkinderena overdetectionovertreatmentandcostsinprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancer
AT weverem overdetectionovertreatmentandcostsinprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancer
AT draismag overdetectionovertreatmentandcostsinprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancer
AT roobolmj overdetectionovertreatmentandcostsinprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancer
AT dekoninghj overdetectionovertreatmentandcostsinprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancer