Cargando…

Assessment of breast cancer opportunistic screening by clinical–pathological indicators: a population-based study

BACKGROUND: Although some clinical–pathological features of breast cancers, such as the incidence of ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) and the diameter of invasive tumours, are sensitive indicators of early detection, comprehensive population-based studies of opportunistic screening are needed. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bordoni, A, Probst-Hensch, N M, Mazzucchelli, L, Spitale, A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2788260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19861962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605378
_version_ 1782174955212898304
author Bordoni, A
Probst-Hensch, N M
Mazzucchelli, L
Spitale, A
author_facet Bordoni, A
Probst-Hensch, N M
Mazzucchelli, L
Spitale, A
author_sort Bordoni, A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although some clinical–pathological features of breast cancers, such as the incidence of ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) and the diameter of invasive tumours, are sensitive indicators of early detection, comprehensive population-based studies of opportunistic screening are needed. METHODS: Cases of DCIS or invasive breast cancer diagnosed in 1996–2007 were identified from the Ticino Cancer Registry (south of Switzerland). Time trends of age-adjusted incidence and mortality, as well as main clinical–pathological features, such as tumour diameter, AJCC stage and histological grade, were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 3047 incident cases of female breast cancer were identified. The proportion of DCIS with respect to invasive cases increased from 5.8% in the period 1996–2001 to 6.4% in the period 2002–2007. The median tumour size of invasive cancers decreased from 20 mm in 1996–2001 to 18 mm in 2002–2007 (P<0.0001). An increase in well/moderately differentiated invasive tumours, from 67% in the period 1996–2001 to 73% in 2002–2007 (P<0.001), was detected and resulted in an Annual Percentage Change of incidence of 2.8 (95% confidence interval: 1.3; 4.3). CONCLUSION: An opportunistic screening strategy can lead to an improvement of prognostic features at diagnosis, but these features are still less favourable than those achieved by organised screening programmes.
format Text
id pubmed-2788260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27882602010-12-01 Assessment of breast cancer opportunistic screening by clinical–pathological indicators: a population-based study Bordoni, A Probst-Hensch, N M Mazzucchelli, L Spitale, A Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Although some clinical–pathological features of breast cancers, such as the incidence of ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) and the diameter of invasive tumours, are sensitive indicators of early detection, comprehensive population-based studies of opportunistic screening are needed. METHODS: Cases of DCIS or invasive breast cancer diagnosed in 1996–2007 were identified from the Ticino Cancer Registry (south of Switzerland). Time trends of age-adjusted incidence and mortality, as well as main clinical–pathological features, such as tumour diameter, AJCC stage and histological grade, were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 3047 incident cases of female breast cancer were identified. The proportion of DCIS with respect to invasive cases increased from 5.8% in the period 1996–2001 to 6.4% in the period 2002–2007. The median tumour size of invasive cancers decreased from 20 mm in 1996–2001 to 18 mm in 2002–2007 (P<0.0001). An increase in well/moderately differentiated invasive tumours, from 67% in the period 1996–2001 to 73% in 2002–2007 (P<0.001), was detected and resulted in an Annual Percentage Change of incidence of 2.8 (95% confidence interval: 1.3; 4.3). CONCLUSION: An opportunistic screening strategy can lead to an improvement of prognostic features at diagnosis, but these features are still less favourable than those achieved by organised screening programmes. Nature Publishing Group 2009-12-01 2009-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2788260/ /pubmed/19861962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605378 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Bordoni, A
Probst-Hensch, N M
Mazzucchelli, L
Spitale, A
Assessment of breast cancer opportunistic screening by clinical–pathological indicators: a population-based study
title Assessment of breast cancer opportunistic screening by clinical–pathological indicators: a population-based study
title_full Assessment of breast cancer opportunistic screening by clinical–pathological indicators: a population-based study
title_fullStr Assessment of breast cancer opportunistic screening by clinical–pathological indicators: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of breast cancer opportunistic screening by clinical–pathological indicators: a population-based study
title_short Assessment of breast cancer opportunistic screening by clinical–pathological indicators: a population-based study
title_sort assessment of breast cancer opportunistic screening by clinical–pathological indicators: a population-based study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2788260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19861962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605378
work_keys_str_mv AT bordonia assessmentofbreastcanceropportunisticscreeningbyclinicalpathologicalindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy
AT probsthenschnm assessmentofbreastcanceropportunisticscreeningbyclinicalpathologicalindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy
AT mazzucchellil assessmentofbreastcanceropportunisticscreeningbyclinicalpathologicalindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy
AT spitalea assessmentofbreastcanceropportunisticscreeningbyclinicalpathologicalindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy