Cargando…
Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance
BACKGROUND: Repeated antimalarial treatment for febrile episodes and self-treatment are common in malaria-endemic areas. The intake of antimalarials prior to participating in an in vivo study may alter treatment outcome and affect the interpretation of both efficacy and safety outcomes. We report th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2788605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20011529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008184 |
_version_ | 1782175004411035648 |
---|---|
author | Hodel, Eva Maria Kabanywanyi, Abdunoor Mulokozi Malila, Aggrey Zanolari, Boris Mercier, Thomas Beck, Hans-Peter Buclin, Thierry Olliaro, Piero Decosterd, Laurent Arthur Genton, Blaise |
author_facet | Hodel, Eva Maria Kabanywanyi, Abdunoor Mulokozi Malila, Aggrey Zanolari, Boris Mercier, Thomas Beck, Hans-Peter Buclin, Thierry Olliaro, Piero Decosterd, Laurent Arthur Genton, Blaise |
author_sort | Hodel, Eva Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Repeated antimalarial treatment for febrile episodes and self-treatment are common in malaria-endemic areas. The intake of antimalarials prior to participating in an in vivo study may alter treatment outcome and affect the interpretation of both efficacy and safety outcomes. We report the findings from baseline plasma sampling of malaria patients prior to inclusion into an in vivo study in Tanzania and discuss the implications of residual concentrations of antimalarials in this setting. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In an in vivo study conducted in a rural area of Tanzania in 2008, baseline plasma samples from patients reporting no antimalarial intake within the last 28 days were screened for the presence of 14 antimalarials (parent drugs or metabolites) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Among the 148 patients enrolled, 110 (74.3%) had at least one antimalarial in their plasma: 80 (54.1%) had lumefantrine above the lower limit of calibration (LLC = 4 ng/mL), 7 (4.7%) desbutyl-lumefantrine (4 ng/mL), 77 (52.0%) sulfadoxine (0.5 ng/mL), 15 (10.1%) pyrimethamine (0.5 ng/mL), 16 (10.8%) quinine (2.5 ng/mL) and none chloroquine (2.5 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with detectable antimalarial drug levels prior to enrollment into the study is worrying. Indeed artemether–lumefantrine was supposed to be available only at government health facilities. Although sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine is only recommended for intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp), it was still widely used in public and private health facilities and sold in drug shops. Self-reporting of previous drug intake is unreliable and thus screening for the presence of antimalarial drug levels should be considered in future in vivo studies to allow for accurate assessment of treatment outcome. Furthermore, persisting sub-therapeutic drug levels of antimalarials in a population could promote the spread of drug resistance. The knowledge on drug pressure in a given population is important to monitor standard treatment policy implementation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2788605 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27886052009-12-14 Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance Hodel, Eva Maria Kabanywanyi, Abdunoor Mulokozi Malila, Aggrey Zanolari, Boris Mercier, Thomas Beck, Hans-Peter Buclin, Thierry Olliaro, Piero Decosterd, Laurent Arthur Genton, Blaise PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Repeated antimalarial treatment for febrile episodes and self-treatment are common in malaria-endemic areas. The intake of antimalarials prior to participating in an in vivo study may alter treatment outcome and affect the interpretation of both efficacy and safety outcomes. We report the findings from baseline plasma sampling of malaria patients prior to inclusion into an in vivo study in Tanzania and discuss the implications of residual concentrations of antimalarials in this setting. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In an in vivo study conducted in a rural area of Tanzania in 2008, baseline plasma samples from patients reporting no antimalarial intake within the last 28 days were screened for the presence of 14 antimalarials (parent drugs or metabolites) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Among the 148 patients enrolled, 110 (74.3%) had at least one antimalarial in their plasma: 80 (54.1%) had lumefantrine above the lower limit of calibration (LLC = 4 ng/mL), 7 (4.7%) desbutyl-lumefantrine (4 ng/mL), 77 (52.0%) sulfadoxine (0.5 ng/mL), 15 (10.1%) pyrimethamine (0.5 ng/mL), 16 (10.8%) quinine (2.5 ng/mL) and none chloroquine (2.5 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with detectable antimalarial drug levels prior to enrollment into the study is worrying. Indeed artemether–lumefantrine was supposed to be available only at government health facilities. Although sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine is only recommended for intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp), it was still widely used in public and private health facilities and sold in drug shops. Self-reporting of previous drug intake is unreliable and thus screening for the presence of antimalarial drug levels should be considered in future in vivo studies to allow for accurate assessment of treatment outcome. Furthermore, persisting sub-therapeutic drug levels of antimalarials in a population could promote the spread of drug resistance. The knowledge on drug pressure in a given population is important to monitor standard treatment policy implementation. Public Library of Science 2009-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2788605/ /pubmed/20011529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008184 Text en Hodel et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hodel, Eva Maria Kabanywanyi, Abdunoor Mulokozi Malila, Aggrey Zanolari, Boris Mercier, Thomas Beck, Hans-Peter Buclin, Thierry Olliaro, Piero Decosterd, Laurent Arthur Genton, Blaise Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance |
title | Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance |
title_full | Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance |
title_fullStr | Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance |
title_full_unstemmed | Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance |
title_short | Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance |
title_sort | residual antimalarials in malaria patients from tanzania – implications on drug efficacy assessment and spread of parasite resistance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2788605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20011529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hodelevamaria residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance AT kabanywanyiabdunoormulokozi residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance AT malilaaggrey residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance AT zanolariboris residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance AT mercierthomas residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance AT beckhanspeter residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance AT buclinthierry residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance AT olliaropiero residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance AT decosterdlaurentarthur residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance AT gentonblaise residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance |