Cargando…

Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance

BACKGROUND: Repeated antimalarial treatment for febrile episodes and self-treatment are common in malaria-endemic areas. The intake of antimalarials prior to participating in an in vivo study may alter treatment outcome and affect the interpretation of both efficacy and safety outcomes. We report th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hodel, Eva Maria, Kabanywanyi, Abdunoor Mulokozi, Malila, Aggrey, Zanolari, Boris, Mercier, Thomas, Beck, Hans-Peter, Buclin, Thierry, Olliaro, Piero, Decosterd, Laurent Arthur, Genton, Blaise
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2788605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20011529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008184
_version_ 1782175004411035648
author Hodel, Eva Maria
Kabanywanyi, Abdunoor Mulokozi
Malila, Aggrey
Zanolari, Boris
Mercier, Thomas
Beck, Hans-Peter
Buclin, Thierry
Olliaro, Piero
Decosterd, Laurent Arthur
Genton, Blaise
author_facet Hodel, Eva Maria
Kabanywanyi, Abdunoor Mulokozi
Malila, Aggrey
Zanolari, Boris
Mercier, Thomas
Beck, Hans-Peter
Buclin, Thierry
Olliaro, Piero
Decosterd, Laurent Arthur
Genton, Blaise
author_sort Hodel, Eva Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Repeated antimalarial treatment for febrile episodes and self-treatment are common in malaria-endemic areas. The intake of antimalarials prior to participating in an in vivo study may alter treatment outcome and affect the interpretation of both efficacy and safety outcomes. We report the findings from baseline plasma sampling of malaria patients prior to inclusion into an in vivo study in Tanzania and discuss the implications of residual concentrations of antimalarials in this setting. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In an in vivo study conducted in a rural area of Tanzania in 2008, baseline plasma samples from patients reporting no antimalarial intake within the last 28 days were screened for the presence of 14 antimalarials (parent drugs or metabolites) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Among the 148 patients enrolled, 110 (74.3%) had at least one antimalarial in their plasma: 80 (54.1%) had lumefantrine above the lower limit of calibration (LLC = 4 ng/mL), 7 (4.7%) desbutyl-lumefantrine (4 ng/mL), 77 (52.0%) sulfadoxine (0.5 ng/mL), 15 (10.1%) pyrimethamine (0.5 ng/mL), 16 (10.8%) quinine (2.5 ng/mL) and none chloroquine (2.5 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with detectable antimalarial drug levels prior to enrollment into the study is worrying. Indeed artemether–lumefantrine was supposed to be available only at government health facilities. Although sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine is only recommended for intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp), it was still widely used in public and private health facilities and sold in drug shops. Self-reporting of previous drug intake is unreliable and thus screening for the presence of antimalarial drug levels should be considered in future in vivo studies to allow for accurate assessment of treatment outcome. Furthermore, persisting sub-therapeutic drug levels of antimalarials in a population could promote the spread of drug resistance. The knowledge on drug pressure in a given population is important to monitor standard treatment policy implementation.
format Text
id pubmed-2788605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27886052009-12-14 Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance Hodel, Eva Maria Kabanywanyi, Abdunoor Mulokozi Malila, Aggrey Zanolari, Boris Mercier, Thomas Beck, Hans-Peter Buclin, Thierry Olliaro, Piero Decosterd, Laurent Arthur Genton, Blaise PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Repeated antimalarial treatment for febrile episodes and self-treatment are common in malaria-endemic areas. The intake of antimalarials prior to participating in an in vivo study may alter treatment outcome and affect the interpretation of both efficacy and safety outcomes. We report the findings from baseline plasma sampling of malaria patients prior to inclusion into an in vivo study in Tanzania and discuss the implications of residual concentrations of antimalarials in this setting. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In an in vivo study conducted in a rural area of Tanzania in 2008, baseline plasma samples from patients reporting no antimalarial intake within the last 28 days were screened for the presence of 14 antimalarials (parent drugs or metabolites) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Among the 148 patients enrolled, 110 (74.3%) had at least one antimalarial in their plasma: 80 (54.1%) had lumefantrine above the lower limit of calibration (LLC = 4 ng/mL), 7 (4.7%) desbutyl-lumefantrine (4 ng/mL), 77 (52.0%) sulfadoxine (0.5 ng/mL), 15 (10.1%) pyrimethamine (0.5 ng/mL), 16 (10.8%) quinine (2.5 ng/mL) and none chloroquine (2.5 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with detectable antimalarial drug levels prior to enrollment into the study is worrying. Indeed artemether–lumefantrine was supposed to be available only at government health facilities. Although sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine is only recommended for intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp), it was still widely used in public and private health facilities and sold in drug shops. Self-reporting of previous drug intake is unreliable and thus screening for the presence of antimalarial drug levels should be considered in future in vivo studies to allow for accurate assessment of treatment outcome. Furthermore, persisting sub-therapeutic drug levels of antimalarials in a population could promote the spread of drug resistance. The knowledge on drug pressure in a given population is important to monitor standard treatment policy implementation. Public Library of Science 2009-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2788605/ /pubmed/20011529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008184 Text en Hodel et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hodel, Eva Maria
Kabanywanyi, Abdunoor Mulokozi
Malila, Aggrey
Zanolari, Boris
Mercier, Thomas
Beck, Hans-Peter
Buclin, Thierry
Olliaro, Piero
Decosterd, Laurent Arthur
Genton, Blaise
Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance
title Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance
title_full Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance
title_fullStr Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance
title_full_unstemmed Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance
title_short Residual Antimalarials in Malaria Patients from Tanzania – Implications on Drug Efficacy Assessment and Spread of Parasite Resistance
title_sort residual antimalarials in malaria patients from tanzania – implications on drug efficacy assessment and spread of parasite resistance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2788605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20011529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008184
work_keys_str_mv AT hodelevamaria residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance
AT kabanywanyiabdunoormulokozi residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance
AT malilaaggrey residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance
AT zanolariboris residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance
AT mercierthomas residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance
AT beckhanspeter residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance
AT buclinthierry residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance
AT olliaropiero residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance
AT decosterdlaurentarthur residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance
AT gentonblaise residualantimalarialsinmalariapatientsfromtanzaniaimplicationsondrugefficacyassessmentandspreadofparasiteresistance