Cargando…

A questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (Q-DFD): construction and validation

BACKGROUND: Community based prevalence for diabetes related foot disease (DRFD) has been poorly quantified in Australian populations. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a survey tool to facilitate collection of community based prevalence data for individuals with DRFD via telephone in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergin, Shan M, Brand, Caroline A, Colman, Peter G, Campbell, Donald A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2789712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19939276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-2-34
_version_ 1782175063990075392
author Bergin, Shan M
Brand, Caroline A
Colman, Peter G
Campbell, Donald A
author_facet Bergin, Shan M
Brand, Caroline A
Colman, Peter G
Campbell, Donald A
author_sort Bergin, Shan M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Community based prevalence for diabetes related foot disease (DRFD) has been poorly quantified in Australian populations. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a survey tool to facilitate collection of community based prevalence data for individuals with DRFD via telephone interview. METHODS: Agreed components of DRFD were identified through an electronic literature search. Expert feedback and feedback from a population based construction sample were sought on the initial draft. Survey reliability was tested using a cohort recruited through a general practice, a hospital outpatient clinic and an outpatient podiatry clinic. Level of agreement between survey findings and either medical record or clinical assessment was evaluated. RESULTS: The Questionnaire for Diabetes Related Foot Disease (Q-DFD) comprised 12 questions aimed at determining presence of peripheral sensory neuropathy (PN) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD), based on self report of symptoms and/or clinical history, and self report of foot ulceration, amputation and foot deformity. Survey results for 38 from 46 participants demonstrated agreement with either clinical assessment or medical record (kappa 0.65, sensitivity 89.0%, and specificity 77.8%). Correlation for individual survey components was moderate to excellent. Inter and intrarater reliability and test re-test reliability was moderate to high for all survey domains. CONCLUSION: The development of the Q-DFD provides an opportunity for ongoing collection of prevalence estimates for DRFD across Australia.
format Text
id pubmed-2789712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27897122009-12-08 A questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (Q-DFD): construction and validation Bergin, Shan M Brand, Caroline A Colman, Peter G Campbell, Donald A J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Community based prevalence for diabetes related foot disease (DRFD) has been poorly quantified in Australian populations. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a survey tool to facilitate collection of community based prevalence data for individuals with DRFD via telephone interview. METHODS: Agreed components of DRFD were identified through an electronic literature search. Expert feedback and feedback from a population based construction sample were sought on the initial draft. Survey reliability was tested using a cohort recruited through a general practice, a hospital outpatient clinic and an outpatient podiatry clinic. Level of agreement between survey findings and either medical record or clinical assessment was evaluated. RESULTS: The Questionnaire for Diabetes Related Foot Disease (Q-DFD) comprised 12 questions aimed at determining presence of peripheral sensory neuropathy (PN) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD), based on self report of symptoms and/or clinical history, and self report of foot ulceration, amputation and foot deformity. Survey results for 38 from 46 participants demonstrated agreement with either clinical assessment or medical record (kappa 0.65, sensitivity 89.0%, and specificity 77.8%). Correlation for individual survey components was moderate to excellent. Inter and intrarater reliability and test re-test reliability was moderate to high for all survey domains. CONCLUSION: The development of the Q-DFD provides an opportunity for ongoing collection of prevalence estimates for DRFD across Australia. BioMed Central 2009-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2789712/ /pubmed/19939276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-2-34 Text en Copyright ©2009 Bergin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bergin, Shan M
Brand, Caroline A
Colman, Peter G
Campbell, Donald A
A questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (Q-DFD): construction and validation
title A questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (Q-DFD): construction and validation
title_full A questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (Q-DFD): construction and validation
title_fullStr A questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (Q-DFD): construction and validation
title_full_unstemmed A questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (Q-DFD): construction and validation
title_short A questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (Q-DFD): construction and validation
title_sort questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (q-dfd): construction and validation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2789712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19939276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-2-34
work_keys_str_mv AT berginshanm aquestionnairefordeterminingprevalenceofdiabetesrelatedfootdiseaseqdfdconstructionandvalidation
AT brandcarolinea aquestionnairefordeterminingprevalenceofdiabetesrelatedfootdiseaseqdfdconstructionandvalidation
AT colmanpeterg aquestionnairefordeterminingprevalenceofdiabetesrelatedfootdiseaseqdfdconstructionandvalidation
AT campbelldonalda aquestionnairefordeterminingprevalenceofdiabetesrelatedfootdiseaseqdfdconstructionandvalidation
AT berginshanm questionnairefordeterminingprevalenceofdiabetesrelatedfootdiseaseqdfdconstructionandvalidation
AT brandcarolinea questionnairefordeterminingprevalenceofdiabetesrelatedfootdiseaseqdfdconstructionandvalidation
AT colmanpeterg questionnairefordeterminingprevalenceofdiabetesrelatedfootdiseaseqdfdconstructionandvalidation
AT campbelldonalda questionnairefordeterminingprevalenceofdiabetesrelatedfootdiseaseqdfdconstructionandvalidation