Cargando…

Pre-Exposure to Moving Form Enhances Static Form Sensitivity

BACKGROUND: Motion-defined form can seem to persist briefly after motion ceases, before seeming to gradually disappear into the background. Here we investigate if this subjective persistence reflects a signal capable of improving objective measures of sensitivity to static form. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallis, Thomas S. A., Williams, Mark A., Arnold, Derek H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2789944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20019815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008324
_version_ 1782175077053235200
author Wallis, Thomas S. A.
Williams, Mark A.
Arnold, Derek H.
author_facet Wallis, Thomas S. A.
Williams, Mark A.
Arnold, Derek H.
author_sort Wallis, Thomas S. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Motion-defined form can seem to persist briefly after motion ceases, before seeming to gradually disappear into the background. Here we investigate if this subjective persistence reflects a signal capable of improving objective measures of sensitivity to static form. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We presented a sinusoidal modulation of luminance, masked by a background noise pattern. The sinusoidal luminance modulation was usually subjectively invisible when static, but visible when moving. We found that drifting then stopping the waveform resulted in a transient subjective persistence of the waveform in the static display. Observers' objective sensitivity to the position of the static waveform was also improved after viewing moving waveforms, compared to viewing static waveforms for a matched duration. This facilitation did not occur simply because movement provided more perspectives of the waveform, since performance following pre-exposure to scrambled animations did not match that following pre-exposure to smooth motion. Observers did not simply remember waveform positions at motion offset, since removing the waveform before testing reduced performance. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Motion processing therefore interacts with subsequent static visual inputs in a way that can improve performance in objective sensitivity measures. We suggest that the brief subjective persistence of motion-defined forms that can occur after motion offsets is a consequence of the decay of a static form signal that has been transiently enhanced by motion processing.
format Text
id pubmed-2789944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27899442009-12-18 Pre-Exposure to Moving Form Enhances Static Form Sensitivity Wallis, Thomas S. A. Williams, Mark A. Arnold, Derek H. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Motion-defined form can seem to persist briefly after motion ceases, before seeming to gradually disappear into the background. Here we investigate if this subjective persistence reflects a signal capable of improving objective measures of sensitivity to static form. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We presented a sinusoidal modulation of luminance, masked by a background noise pattern. The sinusoidal luminance modulation was usually subjectively invisible when static, but visible when moving. We found that drifting then stopping the waveform resulted in a transient subjective persistence of the waveform in the static display. Observers' objective sensitivity to the position of the static waveform was also improved after viewing moving waveforms, compared to viewing static waveforms for a matched duration. This facilitation did not occur simply because movement provided more perspectives of the waveform, since performance following pre-exposure to scrambled animations did not match that following pre-exposure to smooth motion. Observers did not simply remember waveform positions at motion offset, since removing the waveform before testing reduced performance. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Motion processing therefore interacts with subsequent static visual inputs in a way that can improve performance in objective sensitivity measures. We suggest that the brief subjective persistence of motion-defined forms that can occur after motion offsets is a consequence of the decay of a static form signal that has been transiently enhanced by motion processing. Public Library of Science 2009-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2789944/ /pubmed/20019815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008324 Text en Wallis et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wallis, Thomas S. A.
Williams, Mark A.
Arnold, Derek H.
Pre-Exposure to Moving Form Enhances Static Form Sensitivity
title Pre-Exposure to Moving Form Enhances Static Form Sensitivity
title_full Pre-Exposure to Moving Form Enhances Static Form Sensitivity
title_fullStr Pre-Exposure to Moving Form Enhances Static Form Sensitivity
title_full_unstemmed Pre-Exposure to Moving Form Enhances Static Form Sensitivity
title_short Pre-Exposure to Moving Form Enhances Static Form Sensitivity
title_sort pre-exposure to moving form enhances static form sensitivity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2789944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20019815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008324
work_keys_str_mv AT wallisthomassa preexposuretomovingformenhancesstaticformsensitivity
AT williamsmarka preexposuretomovingformenhancesstaticformsensitivity
AT arnoldderekh preexposuretomovingformenhancesstaticformsensitivity