Cargando…

Tradeoff Between Stability and Multispecificity in the Design of Promiscuous Proteins

Natural proteins often partake in several highly specific protein-protein interactions. They are thus subject to multiple opposing forces during evolutionary selection. To be functional, such multispecific proteins need to be stable in complex with each interaction partner, and, at the same time, to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fromer, Menachem, Shifman, Julia M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20041208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000627
_version_ 1782175102040801280
author Fromer, Menachem
Shifman, Julia M.
author_facet Fromer, Menachem
Shifman, Julia M.
author_sort Fromer, Menachem
collection PubMed
description Natural proteins often partake in several highly specific protein-protein interactions. They are thus subject to multiple opposing forces during evolutionary selection. To be functional, such multispecific proteins need to be stable in complex with each interaction partner, and, at the same time, to maintain affinity toward all partners. How is this multispecificity acquired through natural evolution? To answer this compelling question, we study a prototypical multispecific protein, calmodulin (CaM), which has evolved to interact with hundreds of target proteins. Starting from high-resolution structures of sixteen CaM-target complexes, we employ state-of-the-art computational methods to predict a hundred CaM sequences best suited for interaction with each individual CaM target. Then, we design CaM sequences most compatible with each possible combination of two, three, and all sixteen targets simultaneously, producing almost 70,000 low energy CaM sequences. By comparing these sequences and their energies, we gain insight into how nature has managed to find the compromise between the need for favorable interaction energies and the need for multispecificity. We observe that designing for more partners simultaneously yields CaM sequences that better match natural sequence profiles, thus emphasizing the importance of such strategies in nature. Furthermore, we show that the CaM binding interface can be nicely partitioned into positions that are critical for the affinity of all CaM-target complexes and those that are molded to provide interaction specificity. We reveal several basic categories of sequence-level tradeoffs that enable the compromise necessary for the promiscuity of this protein. We also thoroughly quantify the tradeoff between interaction energetics and multispecificity and find that facilitating seemingly competing interactions requires only a small deviation from optimal energies. We conclude that multispecific proteins have been subjected to a rigorous optimization process that has fine-tuned their sequences for interactions with a precise set of targets, thus conferring their multiple cellular functions.
format Text
id pubmed-2790338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27903382009-12-30 Tradeoff Between Stability and Multispecificity in the Design of Promiscuous Proteins Fromer, Menachem Shifman, Julia M. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Natural proteins often partake in several highly specific protein-protein interactions. They are thus subject to multiple opposing forces during evolutionary selection. To be functional, such multispecific proteins need to be stable in complex with each interaction partner, and, at the same time, to maintain affinity toward all partners. How is this multispecificity acquired through natural evolution? To answer this compelling question, we study a prototypical multispecific protein, calmodulin (CaM), which has evolved to interact with hundreds of target proteins. Starting from high-resolution structures of sixteen CaM-target complexes, we employ state-of-the-art computational methods to predict a hundred CaM sequences best suited for interaction with each individual CaM target. Then, we design CaM sequences most compatible with each possible combination of two, three, and all sixteen targets simultaneously, producing almost 70,000 low energy CaM sequences. By comparing these sequences and their energies, we gain insight into how nature has managed to find the compromise between the need for favorable interaction energies and the need for multispecificity. We observe that designing for more partners simultaneously yields CaM sequences that better match natural sequence profiles, thus emphasizing the importance of such strategies in nature. Furthermore, we show that the CaM binding interface can be nicely partitioned into positions that are critical for the affinity of all CaM-target complexes and those that are molded to provide interaction specificity. We reveal several basic categories of sequence-level tradeoffs that enable the compromise necessary for the promiscuity of this protein. We also thoroughly quantify the tradeoff between interaction energetics and multispecificity and find that facilitating seemingly competing interactions requires only a small deviation from optimal energies. We conclude that multispecific proteins have been subjected to a rigorous optimization process that has fine-tuned their sequences for interactions with a precise set of targets, thus conferring their multiple cellular functions. Public Library of Science 2009-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2790338/ /pubmed/20041208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000627 Text en Fromer, Shifman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fromer, Menachem
Shifman, Julia M.
Tradeoff Between Stability and Multispecificity in the Design of Promiscuous Proteins
title Tradeoff Between Stability and Multispecificity in the Design of Promiscuous Proteins
title_full Tradeoff Between Stability and Multispecificity in the Design of Promiscuous Proteins
title_fullStr Tradeoff Between Stability and Multispecificity in the Design of Promiscuous Proteins
title_full_unstemmed Tradeoff Between Stability and Multispecificity in the Design of Promiscuous Proteins
title_short Tradeoff Between Stability and Multispecificity in the Design of Promiscuous Proteins
title_sort tradeoff between stability and multispecificity in the design of promiscuous proteins
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20041208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000627
work_keys_str_mv AT fromermenachem tradeoffbetweenstabilityandmultispecificityinthedesignofpromiscuousproteins
AT shifmanjuliam tradeoffbetweenstabilityandmultispecificityinthedesignofpromiscuousproteins