Cargando…

Culture Modulates Eye-Movements to Visual Novelty

BACKGROUND: When viewing complex scenes, East Asians attend more to contexts whereas Westerners attend more to objects, reflecting cultural differences in holistic and analytic visual processing styles respectively. This eye-tracking study investigated more specific mechanisms and the robustness of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goh, Joshua O., Tan, Jiat Chow, Park, Denise C.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20016829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008238
_version_ 1782175102270439424
author Goh, Joshua O.
Tan, Jiat Chow
Park, Denise C.
author_facet Goh, Joshua O.
Tan, Jiat Chow
Park, Denise C.
author_sort Goh, Joshua O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When viewing complex scenes, East Asians attend more to contexts whereas Westerners attend more to objects, reflecting cultural differences in holistic and analytic visual processing styles respectively. This eye-tracking study investigated more specific mechanisms and the robustness of these cultural biases in visual processing when salient changes in the objects and backgrounds occur in complex pictures. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Chinese Singaporean (East Asian) and Caucasian US (Western) participants passively viewed pictures containing selectively changing objects and background scenes that strongly captured participants' attention in a data-driven manner. We found that although participants from both groups responded to object changes in the pictures, there was still evidence for cultural divergence in eye-movements. The number of object fixations in the US participants was more affected by object change than in the Singapore participants. Additionally, despite the picture manipulations, US participants consistently maintained longer durations for both object and background fixations, with eye-movements that generally remained within the focal objects. In contrast, Singapore participants had shorter fixation durations with eye-movements that alternated more between objects and backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results demonstrate a robust cultural bias in visual processing even when external stimuli draw attention in an opposite manner to the cultural bias. These findings also extend previous studies by revealing more specific, but consistent, effects of culture on the different aspects of visual attention as measured by fixation duration, number of fixations, and saccades between objects and backgrounds.
format Text
id pubmed-2790339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27903392009-12-17 Culture Modulates Eye-Movements to Visual Novelty Goh, Joshua O. Tan, Jiat Chow Park, Denise C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: When viewing complex scenes, East Asians attend more to contexts whereas Westerners attend more to objects, reflecting cultural differences in holistic and analytic visual processing styles respectively. This eye-tracking study investigated more specific mechanisms and the robustness of these cultural biases in visual processing when salient changes in the objects and backgrounds occur in complex pictures. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Chinese Singaporean (East Asian) and Caucasian US (Western) participants passively viewed pictures containing selectively changing objects and background scenes that strongly captured participants' attention in a data-driven manner. We found that although participants from both groups responded to object changes in the pictures, there was still evidence for cultural divergence in eye-movements. The number of object fixations in the US participants was more affected by object change than in the Singapore participants. Additionally, despite the picture manipulations, US participants consistently maintained longer durations for both object and background fixations, with eye-movements that generally remained within the focal objects. In contrast, Singapore participants had shorter fixation durations with eye-movements that alternated more between objects and backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results demonstrate a robust cultural bias in visual processing even when external stimuli draw attention in an opposite manner to the cultural bias. These findings also extend previous studies by revealing more specific, but consistent, effects of culture on the different aspects of visual attention as measured by fixation duration, number of fixations, and saccades between objects and backgrounds. Public Library of Science 2009-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2790339/ /pubmed/20016829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008238 Text en Goh et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goh, Joshua O.
Tan, Jiat Chow
Park, Denise C.
Culture Modulates Eye-Movements to Visual Novelty
title Culture Modulates Eye-Movements to Visual Novelty
title_full Culture Modulates Eye-Movements to Visual Novelty
title_fullStr Culture Modulates Eye-Movements to Visual Novelty
title_full_unstemmed Culture Modulates Eye-Movements to Visual Novelty
title_short Culture Modulates Eye-Movements to Visual Novelty
title_sort culture modulates eye-movements to visual novelty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20016829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008238
work_keys_str_mv AT gohjoshuao culturemodulateseyemovementstovisualnovelty
AT tanjiatchow culturemodulateseyemovementstovisualnovelty
AT parkdenisec culturemodulateseyemovementstovisualnovelty