Cargando…

Auditing the diagnosis of cancer in primary care: the experience in Scotland

INTRODUCTION: This paper reports on an ongoing primary care audit of cancer referrals undertaken in Scotland in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008. METHODS: General practitioners (GPs) in Scotland were asked to review all new cancer diagnoses within their practice during the preceding year. RESULTS: 4181 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baughan, P, O'Neill, B, Fletcher, E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19956170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605397
_version_ 1782175128172363776
author Baughan, P
O'Neill, B
Fletcher, E
author_facet Baughan, P
O'Neill, B
Fletcher, E
author_sort Baughan, P
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This paper reports on an ongoing primary care audit of cancer referrals undertaken in Scotland in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008. METHODS: General practitioners (GPs) in Scotland were asked to review all new cancer diagnoses within their practice during the preceding year. RESULTS: 4181 patients were identified in year 1 and 12 294 in year 2. The pathway taken for patients to present to, and be referred from, their GP has been analysed for 7430 of the 12 294 patients identified within year 2 across five separate health boards. The time from first symptoms to presentation to a GP varied between tumour types, being the longest (median 30 days) for head and neck cancers and the shortest (median 2 days) for bladder cancer. In all, 25% of patients within the following tumour groups waited longer than 2 months to present to their GP following first symptoms: prostate, colorectal, melanoma and head and neck cancers. Once patients had presented to their GP, those with prostate and lung cancer were referred later (median time 11 days) than those with breast cancer (median time 2 days). The priority with which GPs referred patients varied considerably between tumour groups (breast cancer 77.5% ‘urgent’ compared with prostate cancer 44.7% ‘urgent’). In one health board the proportion of cancer patients being referred urgently increased from 46% to 58% between the first and second audit. CONCLUSION: Our data show that there are very different patterns of presentation and referral for patients with cancer, with some tumour groups being more likely to be associated with a delayed diagnosis than others.
format Text
id pubmed-2790697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27906972009-12-18 Auditing the diagnosis of cancer in primary care: the experience in Scotland Baughan, P O'Neill, B Fletcher, E Br J Cancer Full Paper INTRODUCTION: This paper reports on an ongoing primary care audit of cancer referrals undertaken in Scotland in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008. METHODS: General practitioners (GPs) in Scotland were asked to review all new cancer diagnoses within their practice during the preceding year. RESULTS: 4181 patients were identified in year 1 and 12 294 in year 2. The pathway taken for patients to present to, and be referred from, their GP has been analysed for 7430 of the 12 294 patients identified within year 2 across five separate health boards. The time from first symptoms to presentation to a GP varied between tumour types, being the longest (median 30 days) for head and neck cancers and the shortest (median 2 days) for bladder cancer. In all, 25% of patients within the following tumour groups waited longer than 2 months to present to their GP following first symptoms: prostate, colorectal, melanoma and head and neck cancers. Once patients had presented to their GP, those with prostate and lung cancer were referred later (median time 11 days) than those with breast cancer (median time 2 days). The priority with which GPs referred patients varied considerably between tumour groups (breast cancer 77.5% ‘urgent’ compared with prostate cancer 44.7% ‘urgent’). In one health board the proportion of cancer patients being referred urgently increased from 46% to 58% between the first and second audit. CONCLUSION: Our data show that there are very different patterns of presentation and referral for patients with cancer, with some tumour groups being more likely to be associated with a delayed diagnosis than others. Nature Publishing Group 2009-12-03 2009-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2790697/ /pubmed/19956170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605397 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Baughan, P
O'Neill, B
Fletcher, E
Auditing the diagnosis of cancer in primary care: the experience in Scotland
title Auditing the diagnosis of cancer in primary care: the experience in Scotland
title_full Auditing the diagnosis of cancer in primary care: the experience in Scotland
title_fullStr Auditing the diagnosis of cancer in primary care: the experience in Scotland
title_full_unstemmed Auditing the diagnosis of cancer in primary care: the experience in Scotland
title_short Auditing the diagnosis of cancer in primary care: the experience in Scotland
title_sort auditing the diagnosis of cancer in primary care: the experience in scotland
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19956170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605397
work_keys_str_mv AT baughanp auditingthediagnosisofcancerinprimarycaretheexperienceinscotland
AT oneillb auditingthediagnosisofcancerinprimarycaretheexperienceinscotland
AT fletchere auditingthediagnosisofcancerinprimarycaretheexperienceinscotland