Cargando…

Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop and validate a measurement tool to assess cancer awareness in the general population: the cancer awareness measure (CAM). METHODS: Items assessing awareness of cancer warning signs, risk factors, incidence, screening programmes and attitudes towards help seeking were e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stubbings, S, Robb, K, Waller, J, Ramirez, A, Austoker, J, Macleod, U, Hiom, S, Wardle, J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19956157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605385
_version_ 1782175128651563008
author Stubbings, S
Robb, K
Waller, J
Ramirez, A
Austoker, J
Macleod, U
Hiom, S
Wardle, J
author_facet Stubbings, S
Robb, K
Waller, J
Ramirez, A
Austoker, J
Macleod, U
Hiom, S
Wardle, J
author_sort Stubbings, S
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop and validate a measurement tool to assess cancer awareness in the general population: the cancer awareness measure (CAM). METHODS: Items assessing awareness of cancer warning signs, risk factors, incidence, screening programmes and attitudes towards help seeking were extracted from the literature or generated by expert groups. To determine reliability, the CAM was administered to a university participant panel (n=148), with a sub-sample (n=94) completing it again 2 weeks later. To establish construct validity, CAM scores of cancer experts (n=12) were compared with those of non-medical academics (n=21). Finally, university students (n=49) were randomly assigned to read either a cancer information leaflet or a leaflet with control information before completing the measure, to ensure the CAM was sensitive to change. RESULTS: Cognitive interviewing indicated that the CAM was being interpreted as intended. Internal reliability (Cronbach's α=0.77) and test–retest reliability (r=0.81) were high. Scores for cancer experts were significantly higher than those for non-medical academics (t(31)=6.8, P<0.001). CAM scores were higher among students who received an intervention leaflet than the control leaflet (t(47)=4.8, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These studies show the psychometric properties of the CAM and support its validity as a measure of cancer awareness in the general population.
format Text
id pubmed-2790699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27906992009-12-18 Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer Stubbings, S Robb, K Waller, J Ramirez, A Austoker, J Macleod, U Hiom, S Wardle, J Br J Cancer Full Paper OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop and validate a measurement tool to assess cancer awareness in the general population: the cancer awareness measure (CAM). METHODS: Items assessing awareness of cancer warning signs, risk factors, incidence, screening programmes and attitudes towards help seeking were extracted from the literature or generated by expert groups. To determine reliability, the CAM was administered to a university participant panel (n=148), with a sub-sample (n=94) completing it again 2 weeks later. To establish construct validity, CAM scores of cancer experts (n=12) were compared with those of non-medical academics (n=21). Finally, university students (n=49) were randomly assigned to read either a cancer information leaflet or a leaflet with control information before completing the measure, to ensure the CAM was sensitive to change. RESULTS: Cognitive interviewing indicated that the CAM was being interpreted as intended. Internal reliability (Cronbach's α=0.77) and test–retest reliability (r=0.81) were high. Scores for cancer experts were significantly higher than those for non-medical academics (t(31)=6.8, P<0.001). CAM scores were higher among students who received an intervention leaflet than the control leaflet (t(47)=4.8, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These studies show the psychometric properties of the CAM and support its validity as a measure of cancer awareness in the general population. Nature Publishing Group 2009-12-03 2009-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2790699/ /pubmed/19956157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605385 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Stubbings, S
Robb, K
Waller, J
Ramirez, A
Austoker, J
Macleod, U
Hiom, S
Wardle, J
Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer
title Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer
title_full Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer
title_fullStr Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer
title_full_unstemmed Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer
title_short Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer
title_sort development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19956157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605385
work_keys_str_mv AT stubbingss developmentofameasurementtooltoassesspublicawarenessofcancer
AT robbk developmentofameasurementtooltoassesspublicawarenessofcancer
AT wallerj developmentofameasurementtooltoassesspublicawarenessofcancer
AT ramireza developmentofameasurementtooltoassesspublicawarenessofcancer
AT austokerj developmentofameasurementtooltoassesspublicawarenessofcancer
AT macleodu developmentofameasurementtooltoassesspublicawarenessofcancer
AT hioms developmentofameasurementtooltoassesspublicawarenessofcancer
AT wardlej developmentofameasurementtooltoassesspublicawarenessofcancer