Cargando…
An Information Gap in DNA Evidence Interpretation
Forensic DNA evidence often contains mixtures of multiple contributors, or is present in low template amounts. The resulting data signals may appear to be relatively uninformative when interpreted using qualitative inclusion-based methods. However, these same data can yield greater identification in...
Autores principales: | Perlin, Mark W., Sinelnikov, Alexander |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2791197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20020039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008327 |
Ejemplares similares
-
TrueAllele Casework on Virginia DNA Mixture Evidence: Computer and Manual Interpretation in 72 Reported Criminal Cases
por: Perlin, Mark W., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Validating TrueAllele(®) Interpretation of DNA Mixtures Containing up to Ten Unknown Contributors
por: Bauer, David W., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Inclusion probability for DNA mixtures is a subjective one-sided match statistic unrelated to identification information
por: Perlin, Mark William
Publicado: (2015) -
Revisiting the public–private wage gap in Spain: new evidence and interpretation
por: Couceiro de León, Alba, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Filling in the gaps: The interpretation of curricula vitae in peer review
por: Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang, et al.
Publicado: (2019)