Cargando…
Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations
BACKGROUND: Two key findings from genomic selection experiments are 1) the reference population used must be very large to subsequently predict accurate genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV), and 2) prediction equations derived in one breed do not predict accurate GEBV when applied to other breed...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2791750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19930712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-51 |
_version_ | 1782175196993552384 |
---|---|
author | Hayes, Ben J Bowman, Phillip J Chamberlain, Amanda C Verbyla, Klara Goddard, Mike E |
author_facet | Hayes, Ben J Bowman, Phillip J Chamberlain, Amanda C Verbyla, Klara Goddard, Mike E |
author_sort | Hayes, Ben J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Two key findings from genomic selection experiments are 1) the reference population used must be very large to subsequently predict accurate genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV), and 2) prediction equations derived in one breed do not predict accurate GEBV when applied to other breeds. Both findings are a problem for breeds where the number of individuals in the reference population is limited. A multi-breed reference population is a potential solution, and here we investigate the accuracies of GEBV in Holstein dairy cattle and Jersey dairy cattle when the reference population is single breed or multi-breed. The accuracies were obtained both as a function of elements of the inverse coefficient matrix and from the realised accuracies of GEBV. METHODS: Best linear unbiased prediction with a multi-breed genomic relationship matrix (GBLUP) and two Bayesian methods (BAYESA and BAYES_SSVS) which estimate individual SNP effects were used to predict GEBV for 400 and 77 young Holstein and Jersey bulls respectively, from a reference population of 781 and 287 Holstein and Jersey bulls, respectively. Genotypes of 39,048 SNP markers were used. Phenotypes in the reference population were de-regressed breeding values for production traits. For the GBLUP method, expected accuracies calculated from the diagonal of the inverse of coefficient matrix were compared to realised accuracies. RESULTS: When GBLUP was used, expected accuracies from a function of elements of the inverse coefficient matrix agreed reasonably well with realised accuracies calculated from the correlation between GEBV and EBV in single breed populations, but not in multi-breed populations. When the Bayesian methods were used, realised accuracies of GEBV were up to 13% higher when the multi-breed reference population was used than when a pure breed reference was used. However no consistent increase in accuracy across traits was obtained. CONCLUSION: Predicting genomic breeding values using a genomic relationship matrix is an attractive approach to implement genomic selection as expected accuracies of GEBV can be readily derived. However in multi-breed populations, Bayesian approaches give higher accuracies for some traits. Finally, multi-breed reference populations will be a valuable resource to fine map QTL. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2791750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27917502009-12-11 Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations Hayes, Ben J Bowman, Phillip J Chamberlain, Amanda C Verbyla, Klara Goddard, Mike E Genet Sel Evol Research BACKGROUND: Two key findings from genomic selection experiments are 1) the reference population used must be very large to subsequently predict accurate genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV), and 2) prediction equations derived in one breed do not predict accurate GEBV when applied to other breeds. Both findings are a problem for breeds where the number of individuals in the reference population is limited. A multi-breed reference population is a potential solution, and here we investigate the accuracies of GEBV in Holstein dairy cattle and Jersey dairy cattle when the reference population is single breed or multi-breed. The accuracies were obtained both as a function of elements of the inverse coefficient matrix and from the realised accuracies of GEBV. METHODS: Best linear unbiased prediction with a multi-breed genomic relationship matrix (GBLUP) and two Bayesian methods (BAYESA and BAYES_SSVS) which estimate individual SNP effects were used to predict GEBV for 400 and 77 young Holstein and Jersey bulls respectively, from a reference population of 781 and 287 Holstein and Jersey bulls, respectively. Genotypes of 39,048 SNP markers were used. Phenotypes in the reference population were de-regressed breeding values for production traits. For the GBLUP method, expected accuracies calculated from the diagonal of the inverse of coefficient matrix were compared to realised accuracies. RESULTS: When GBLUP was used, expected accuracies from a function of elements of the inverse coefficient matrix agreed reasonably well with realised accuracies calculated from the correlation between GEBV and EBV in single breed populations, but not in multi-breed populations. When the Bayesian methods were used, realised accuracies of GEBV were up to 13% higher when the multi-breed reference population was used than when a pure breed reference was used. However no consistent increase in accuracy across traits was obtained. CONCLUSION: Predicting genomic breeding values using a genomic relationship matrix is an attractive approach to implement genomic selection as expected accuracies of GEBV can be readily derived. However in multi-breed populations, Bayesian approaches give higher accuracies for some traits. Finally, multi-breed reference populations will be a valuable resource to fine map QTL. BioMed Central 2009-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2791750/ /pubmed/19930712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-51 Text en Copyright ©2009 Hayes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Hayes, Ben J Bowman, Phillip J Chamberlain, Amanda C Verbyla, Klara Goddard, Mike E Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations |
title | Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations |
title_full | Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations |
title_short | Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations |
title_sort | accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2791750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19930712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-51 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hayesbenj accuracyofgenomicbreedingvaluesinmultibreeddairycattlepopulations AT bowmanphillipj accuracyofgenomicbreedingvaluesinmultibreeddairycattlepopulations AT chamberlainamandac accuracyofgenomicbreedingvaluesinmultibreeddairycattlepopulations AT verbylaklara accuracyofgenomicbreedingvaluesinmultibreeddairycattlepopulations AT goddardmikee accuracyofgenomicbreedingvaluesinmultibreeddairycattlepopulations |