Cargando…
Malaria or kalimbe: how to choose?
Should the Kalimbe (a traditional Amerindian loincloth) be banned, based on its association with an increased risk of malaria? Studies on malaria conducted on Amerindian children in the Oyapock region, French Guiana suggest that there is an argument for replacing the Kalimbe with a modern alternativ...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2793262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19961598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-280 |
_version_ | 1782175307919261696 |
---|---|
author | Carme, Bernard |
author_facet | Carme, Bernard |
author_sort | Carme, Bernard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Should the Kalimbe (a traditional Amerindian loincloth) be banned, based on its association with an increased risk of malaria? Studies on malaria conducted on Amerindian children in the Oyapock region, French Guiana suggest that there is an argument for replacing the Kalimbe with a modern alternative. However, the wider issue of how the positive (risk reduction and related benefits) and negative effects (exacerbation of acculturation processes and associated consequences) should be assessed needs to be considered before suggesting a change in ancestral behaviour for medical purposes. A multidisciplinary approach is needed, together with caution and humility from epidemiologists. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2793262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27932622009-12-15 Malaria or kalimbe: how to choose? Carme, Bernard Malar J Commentary Should the Kalimbe (a traditional Amerindian loincloth) be banned, based on its association with an increased risk of malaria? Studies on malaria conducted on Amerindian children in the Oyapock region, French Guiana suggest that there is an argument for replacing the Kalimbe with a modern alternative. However, the wider issue of how the positive (risk reduction and related benefits) and negative effects (exacerbation of acculturation processes and associated consequences) should be assessed needs to be considered before suggesting a change in ancestral behaviour for medical purposes. A multidisciplinary approach is needed, together with caution and humility from epidemiologists. BioMed Central 2009-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2793262/ /pubmed/19961598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-280 Text en Copyright ©2009 Carme; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Carme, Bernard Malaria or kalimbe: how to choose? |
title | Malaria or kalimbe: how to choose? |
title_full | Malaria or kalimbe: how to choose? |
title_fullStr | Malaria or kalimbe: how to choose? |
title_full_unstemmed | Malaria or kalimbe: how to choose? |
title_short | Malaria or kalimbe: how to choose? |
title_sort | malaria or kalimbe: how to choose? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2793262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19961598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carmebernard malariaorkalimbehowtochoose |