Cargando…

Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities - 6(th )SOSORT consensus paper

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive evaluation of the morphology of the spine and of the whole body is essential in order to correctly manage patients suffering from progressive idiopathic scoliosis. Although methodology of clinical and radiological examination is well described in manuals of orthopaedics, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotwicki, Tomasz, Negrini, Stefano, Grivas, Theodoros B, Rigo, Manuel, Maruyama, Toru, Durmala, Jacek, Zaina, Fabio
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2794256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19941650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-4-26
_version_ 1782175362405367808
author Kotwicki, Tomasz
Negrini, Stefano
Grivas, Theodoros B
Rigo, Manuel
Maruyama, Toru
Durmala, Jacek
Zaina, Fabio
author_facet Kotwicki, Tomasz
Negrini, Stefano
Grivas, Theodoros B
Rigo, Manuel
Maruyama, Toru
Durmala, Jacek
Zaina, Fabio
author_sort Kotwicki, Tomasz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comprehensive evaluation of the morphology of the spine and of the whole body is essential in order to correctly manage patients suffering from progressive idiopathic scoliosis. Although methodology of clinical and radiological examination is well described in manuals of orthopaedics, there is deficit of data which clinical and radiological parameters are considered in everyday practise. Recently, an increasing tendency to extend scoliosis examination beyond the measure of the Cobb angle can be observed, reflecting a more patient-oriented approach. Such evaluation often involves surface parameters, aesthetics, function and quality of life. AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate current recommendations of experts on methodology of evaluation of the patient with spinal deformity, essentially idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: Structured Delphi procedure for collecting and processing knowledge from a group of experts with a series of questionnaires and controlled opinion feedback was performed. Experience and opinions of the professionals - physicians and physiotherapists managing scoliosis patients - were studied. According to Delphi method a Meeting Questionnaire (MQ) has been developed, resulting from a preliminary Pre-Meeting Questionnaire (PMQ) which had been previously discussed and approved on line. The MQ was circulated among the SOSORT experts during Consensus Session on "Measurements" which took place at the Annual Meeting of the Society, totally 23 panellists being engaged. Clinical, radiological and surface topography parameters were checked for agreement. RESULTS: 90% agreement or more was reached in 35 items and superior than 75% agreement was reached in further 25 items. An evaluation form was proposed to be used by clinicians and researchers. CONCLUSION: The consensus was reached on evaluation of the morphology of the patient with idiopathic scoliosis, comprising clinical, radiological and, to less extend, surface topography assessment. Considering the variety of parameters indicated by the panellists, the Cobb angle, yet the gold standard, can be seen neither as the unique nor the only decisive parameter in the management of patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
format Text
id pubmed-2794256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27942562009-12-16 Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities - 6(th )SOSORT consensus paper Kotwicki, Tomasz Negrini, Stefano Grivas, Theodoros B Rigo, Manuel Maruyama, Toru Durmala, Jacek Zaina, Fabio Scoliosis Research BACKGROUND: Comprehensive evaluation of the morphology of the spine and of the whole body is essential in order to correctly manage patients suffering from progressive idiopathic scoliosis. Although methodology of clinical and radiological examination is well described in manuals of orthopaedics, there is deficit of data which clinical and radiological parameters are considered in everyday practise. Recently, an increasing tendency to extend scoliosis examination beyond the measure of the Cobb angle can be observed, reflecting a more patient-oriented approach. Such evaluation often involves surface parameters, aesthetics, function and quality of life. AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate current recommendations of experts on methodology of evaluation of the patient with spinal deformity, essentially idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: Structured Delphi procedure for collecting and processing knowledge from a group of experts with a series of questionnaires and controlled opinion feedback was performed. Experience and opinions of the professionals - physicians and physiotherapists managing scoliosis patients - were studied. According to Delphi method a Meeting Questionnaire (MQ) has been developed, resulting from a preliminary Pre-Meeting Questionnaire (PMQ) which had been previously discussed and approved on line. The MQ was circulated among the SOSORT experts during Consensus Session on "Measurements" which took place at the Annual Meeting of the Society, totally 23 panellists being engaged. Clinical, radiological and surface topography parameters were checked for agreement. RESULTS: 90% agreement or more was reached in 35 items and superior than 75% agreement was reached in further 25 items. An evaluation form was proposed to be used by clinicians and researchers. CONCLUSION: The consensus was reached on evaluation of the morphology of the patient with idiopathic scoliosis, comprising clinical, radiological and, to less extend, surface topography assessment. Considering the variety of parameters indicated by the panellists, the Cobb angle, yet the gold standard, can be seen neither as the unique nor the only decisive parameter in the management of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. BioMed Central 2009-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2794256/ /pubmed/19941650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-4-26 Text en Copyright ©2009 Kotwicki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kotwicki, Tomasz
Negrini, Stefano
Grivas, Theodoros B
Rigo, Manuel
Maruyama, Toru
Durmala, Jacek
Zaina, Fabio
Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities - 6(th )SOSORT consensus paper
title Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities - 6(th )SOSORT consensus paper
title_full Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities - 6(th )SOSORT consensus paper
title_fullStr Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities - 6(th )SOSORT consensus paper
title_full_unstemmed Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities - 6(th )SOSORT consensus paper
title_short Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities - 6(th )SOSORT consensus paper
title_sort methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities - 6(th )sosort consensus paper
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2794256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19941650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-4-26
work_keys_str_mv AT kotwickitomasz methodologyofevaluationofmorphologyofthespineandthetrunkinidiopathicscoliosisandotherspinaldeformities6thsosortconsensuspaper
AT negrinistefano methodologyofevaluationofmorphologyofthespineandthetrunkinidiopathicscoliosisandotherspinaldeformities6thsosortconsensuspaper
AT grivastheodorosb methodologyofevaluationofmorphologyofthespineandthetrunkinidiopathicscoliosisandotherspinaldeformities6thsosortconsensuspaper
AT rigomanuel methodologyofevaluationofmorphologyofthespineandthetrunkinidiopathicscoliosisandotherspinaldeformities6thsosortconsensuspaper
AT maruyamatoru methodologyofevaluationofmorphologyofthespineandthetrunkinidiopathicscoliosisandotherspinaldeformities6thsosortconsensuspaper
AT durmalajacek methodologyofevaluationofmorphologyofthespineandthetrunkinidiopathicscoliosisandotherspinaldeformities6thsosortconsensuspaper
AT zainafabio methodologyofevaluationofmorphologyofthespineandthetrunkinidiopathicscoliosisandotherspinaldeformities6thsosortconsensuspaper
AT methodologyofevaluationofmorphologyofthespineandthetrunkinidiopathicscoliosisandotherspinaldeformities6thsosortconsensuspaper