Cargando…
When worlds collide
The UK has a strong tradition of innovative evaluative health care research. There are, however, considerable forces impeding collaboration between clinicians, academics, patients and their advocates and industry. This paper argues that, if the UK is to regain a position at the forefront of clinical...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2794265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19943943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-108 |
_version_ | 1782175364542365696 |
---|---|
author | Adams, Clive E de Lima, Mauricio Silva |
author_facet | Adams, Clive E de Lima, Mauricio Silva |
author_sort | Adams, Clive E |
collection | PubMed |
description | The UK has a strong tradition of innovative evaluative health care research. There are, however, considerable forces impeding collaboration between clinicians, academics, patients and their advocates and industry. This paper argues that, if the UK is to regain a position at the forefront of clinical research into evaluation of care, some of these forces need to be overcome. Now, with explicit encouragement from funders within the UK's NHS, it is urgent that all parties discover better ways of working together so that more broad and meaningful research can be produced in a timely fashion. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2794265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27942652009-12-16 When worlds collide Adams, Clive E de Lima, Mauricio Silva Trials Commentary The UK has a strong tradition of innovative evaluative health care research. There are, however, considerable forces impeding collaboration between clinicians, academics, patients and their advocates and industry. This paper argues that, if the UK is to regain a position at the forefront of clinical research into evaluation of care, some of these forces need to be overcome. Now, with explicit encouragement from funders within the UK's NHS, it is urgent that all parties discover better ways of working together so that more broad and meaningful research can be produced in a timely fashion. BioMed Central 2009-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2794265/ /pubmed/19943943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-108 Text en Copyright ©2009 Adams and de Lima; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Adams, Clive E de Lima, Mauricio Silva When worlds collide |
title | When worlds collide |
title_full | When worlds collide |
title_fullStr | When worlds collide |
title_full_unstemmed | When worlds collide |
title_short | When worlds collide |
title_sort | when worlds collide |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2794265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19943943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamsclivee whenworldscollide AT delimamauriciosilva whenworldscollide |