Cargando…

Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12

RATIONALE: Dyspnoea is a debilitating and distressing symptom that is reflected in different verbal descriptors. Evidence suggests that dyspnoea, like pain perception, consists of sensory quality and affective components. The objective of this study was to develop an instrument that measures overall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yorke, J, Moosavi, S H, Shuldham, C, Jones, P W
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19996336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2009.118521
_version_ 1782175418658324480
author Yorke, J
Moosavi, S H
Shuldham, C
Jones, P W
author_facet Yorke, J
Moosavi, S H
Shuldham, C
Jones, P W
author_sort Yorke, J
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Dyspnoea is a debilitating and distressing symptom that is reflected in different verbal descriptors. Evidence suggests that dyspnoea, like pain perception, consists of sensory quality and affective components. The objective of this study was to develop an instrument that measures overall dyspnoea severity using descriptors that reflect its different aspects. METHODS: 81 dyspnoea descriptors were administered to 123 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 129 with interstitial lung disease and 106 with chronic heart failure. These were reduced to 34 items using hierarchical methods. Rasch analysis informed decisions regarding further item removal and fit to the unidimensional model. Principal component analysis (PCA) explored the underlying structure of the final item set. Validity and reliability of the new instrument were further assessed in a separate group of 53 patients with COPD. RESULTS: After removal of items with hierarchical methods (n = 47) and items that failed to fit the Rasch model (n = 22), 12 were retained. The “Dyspnoea-12” had good internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.9) and fit to the Rasch model (χ(2) p = 0.08). Items patterned into two groups called “physical”(n = 7) and “affective”(n = 5). In the separate validation study, Dyspnoea-12 correlated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (anxiety r = 0.51; depression r = 0.44, p<0.001, respectively), 6-minute walk distance (r = −0.38, p<0.01) and MRC (Medical Research Council) grade (r = 0.48, p<0.01), and had good stability over time (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.9, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Dyspnoea-12 fulfills modern psychometric requirements for measurement. It provides a global score of breathlessness severity that incorporates both “physical” and “affective” aspects, and can measure dyspnoea in a variety of diseases.
format Text
id pubmed-2795166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27951662010-03-12 Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12 Yorke, J Moosavi, S H Shuldham, C Jones, P W Thorax Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease RATIONALE: Dyspnoea is a debilitating and distressing symptom that is reflected in different verbal descriptors. Evidence suggests that dyspnoea, like pain perception, consists of sensory quality and affective components. The objective of this study was to develop an instrument that measures overall dyspnoea severity using descriptors that reflect its different aspects. METHODS: 81 dyspnoea descriptors were administered to 123 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 129 with interstitial lung disease and 106 with chronic heart failure. These were reduced to 34 items using hierarchical methods. Rasch analysis informed decisions regarding further item removal and fit to the unidimensional model. Principal component analysis (PCA) explored the underlying structure of the final item set. Validity and reliability of the new instrument were further assessed in a separate group of 53 patients with COPD. RESULTS: After removal of items with hierarchical methods (n = 47) and items that failed to fit the Rasch model (n = 22), 12 were retained. The “Dyspnoea-12” had good internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.9) and fit to the Rasch model (χ(2) p = 0.08). Items patterned into two groups called “physical”(n = 7) and “affective”(n = 5). In the separate validation study, Dyspnoea-12 correlated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (anxiety r = 0.51; depression r = 0.44, p<0.001, respectively), 6-minute walk distance (r = −0.38, p<0.01) and MRC (Medical Research Council) grade (r = 0.48, p<0.01), and had good stability over time (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.9, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Dyspnoea-12 fulfills modern psychometric requirements for measurement. It provides a global score of breathlessness severity that incorporates both “physical” and “affective” aspects, and can measure dyspnoea in a variety of diseases. BMJ Group 2010-01 2009-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2795166/ /pubmed/19996336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2009.118521 Text en BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Yorke, J
Moosavi, S H
Shuldham, C
Jones, P W
Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12
title Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12
title_full Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12
title_fullStr Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12
title_short Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12
title_sort quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the dyspnoea-12
topic Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19996336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2009.118521
work_keys_str_mv AT yorkej quantificationofdyspnoeausingdescriptorsdevelopmentandinitialtestingofthedyspnoea12
AT moosavish quantificationofdyspnoeausingdescriptorsdevelopmentandinitialtestingofthedyspnoea12
AT shuldhamc quantificationofdyspnoeausingdescriptorsdevelopmentandinitialtestingofthedyspnoea12
AT jonespw quantificationofdyspnoeausingdescriptorsdevelopmentandinitialtestingofthedyspnoea12