Cargando…

Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola

BACKGROUND: Angola's malaria case-management policy recommends treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL). In 2006, AL implementation began in Huambo Province, which involved training health workers (HWs), supervision, delivering AL to health facilities, and improving malaria testing with micr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rowe, Alexander K, de León, Gabriel F Ponce, Mihigo, Jules, Santelli, Ana Carolina FS, Miller, Nathan P, Van-Dúnem, Pedro
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19954537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-275
_version_ 1782175448792301568
author Rowe, Alexander K
de León, Gabriel F Ponce
Mihigo, Jules
Santelli, Ana Carolina FS
Miller, Nathan P
Van-Dúnem, Pedro
author_facet Rowe, Alexander K
de León, Gabriel F Ponce
Mihigo, Jules
Santelli, Ana Carolina FS
Miller, Nathan P
Van-Dúnem, Pedro
author_sort Rowe, Alexander K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Angola's malaria case-management policy recommends treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL). In 2006, AL implementation began in Huambo Province, which involved training health workers (HWs), supervision, delivering AL to health facilities, and improving malaria testing with microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Implementation was complicated by a policy that was sometimes ambiguous. METHODS: Fourteen months after implementation began, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 33 outpatient facilities in Huambo Province to assess their readiness to manage malaria and the quality of malaria case-management for patients of all ages. Consultations were observed, patients were interviewed and re-examined, and HWs were interviewed. RESULTS: Ninety-three HWs and 177 consultations were evaluated, although many sampled consultations were missed. All facilities had AL in-stock and at least one HW trained to use AL and RDTs. However, anti-malarial stock-outs in the previous three months were common, clinical supervision was infrequent, and HWs had important knowledge gaps. Except for fever history, clinical assessments were often incomplete. Although testing was recommended for all patients with suspected malaria, only 30.7% of such patients were tested. Correct testing was significantly associated with caseloads < 25 patients/day (odds ratio: 18.4; p < 0.0001) and elevated patient temperature (odds ratio: 2.5 per 1°C increase; p = 0.007). Testing was more common among AL-trained HWs, but the association was borderline significant (p = 0.072). When the malaria test was negative, HWs often diagnosed patients with malaria (57.8%) and prescribed anti-malarials (60.0%). Sixty-six percent of malaria-related diagnoses were correct, 20.1% were minor errors, and 13.9% were major (potentially life-threatening) errors. Only 49.0% of malaria treatments were correct, 5.4% were minor errors, and 45.6% were major errors. HWs almost always dosed AL correctly and gave accurate dosing instructions to patients; however, other aspects of counseling needed improvement. CONCLUSION: By late-2007, substantial progress had been made to implement the malaria case-management policy in a setting with weak infrastructure. However, policy ambiguities, under-use of malaria testing, and distrust of negative test results led to many incorrect malaria diagnoses and treatments. In 2009, Angola published a policy that clarified many issues. As problems identified in this survey are not unique to Angola, better strategies for improving HW performance are urgently needed.
format Text
id pubmed-2795764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27957642009-12-18 Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola Rowe, Alexander K de León, Gabriel F Ponce Mihigo, Jules Santelli, Ana Carolina FS Miller, Nathan P Van-Dúnem, Pedro Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Angola's malaria case-management policy recommends treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL). In 2006, AL implementation began in Huambo Province, which involved training health workers (HWs), supervision, delivering AL to health facilities, and improving malaria testing with microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Implementation was complicated by a policy that was sometimes ambiguous. METHODS: Fourteen months after implementation began, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 33 outpatient facilities in Huambo Province to assess their readiness to manage malaria and the quality of malaria case-management for patients of all ages. Consultations were observed, patients were interviewed and re-examined, and HWs were interviewed. RESULTS: Ninety-three HWs and 177 consultations were evaluated, although many sampled consultations were missed. All facilities had AL in-stock and at least one HW trained to use AL and RDTs. However, anti-malarial stock-outs in the previous three months were common, clinical supervision was infrequent, and HWs had important knowledge gaps. Except for fever history, clinical assessments were often incomplete. Although testing was recommended for all patients with suspected malaria, only 30.7% of such patients were tested. Correct testing was significantly associated with caseloads < 25 patients/day (odds ratio: 18.4; p < 0.0001) and elevated patient temperature (odds ratio: 2.5 per 1°C increase; p = 0.007). Testing was more common among AL-trained HWs, but the association was borderline significant (p = 0.072). When the malaria test was negative, HWs often diagnosed patients with malaria (57.8%) and prescribed anti-malarials (60.0%). Sixty-six percent of malaria-related diagnoses were correct, 20.1% were minor errors, and 13.9% were major (potentially life-threatening) errors. Only 49.0% of malaria treatments were correct, 5.4% were minor errors, and 45.6% were major errors. HWs almost always dosed AL correctly and gave accurate dosing instructions to patients; however, other aspects of counseling needed improvement. CONCLUSION: By late-2007, substantial progress had been made to implement the malaria case-management policy in a setting with weak infrastructure. However, policy ambiguities, under-use of malaria testing, and distrust of negative test results led to many incorrect malaria diagnoses and treatments. In 2009, Angola published a policy that clarified many issues. As problems identified in this survey are not unique to Angola, better strategies for improving HW performance are urgently needed. BioMed Central 2009-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2795764/ /pubmed/19954537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-275 Text en Copyright ©2009 Rowe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rowe, Alexander K
de León, Gabriel F Ponce
Mihigo, Jules
Santelli, Ana Carolina FS
Miller, Nathan P
Van-Dúnem, Pedro
Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola
title Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola
title_full Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola
title_fullStr Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola
title_full_unstemmed Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola
title_short Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola
title_sort quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in angola
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19954537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-275
work_keys_str_mv AT rowealexanderk qualityofmalariacasemanagementatoutpatienthealthfacilitiesinangola
AT deleongabrielfponce qualityofmalariacasemanagementatoutpatienthealthfacilitiesinangola
AT mihigojules qualityofmalariacasemanagementatoutpatienthealthfacilitiesinangola
AT santellianacarolinafs qualityofmalariacasemanagementatoutpatienthealthfacilitiesinangola
AT millernathanp qualityofmalariacasemanagementatoutpatienthealthfacilitiesinangola
AT vandunempedro qualityofmalariacasemanagementatoutpatienthealthfacilitiesinangola