Cargando…
The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States
Understanding the cause of failure and type of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures performed in the United States is essential in guiding research, implant design, and clinical decision making in TKA. We assessed the causes of failure and specific types of revision TKA procedures perfo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19554385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0 |
_version_ | 1782175454709415936 |
---|---|
author | Bozic, Kevin J. Kurtz, Steven M. Lau, Edmund Ong, Kevin Chiu, Vanessa Vail, Thomas P. Rubash, Harry E. Berry, Daniel J. |
author_facet | Bozic, Kevin J. Kurtz, Steven M. Lau, Edmund Ong, Kevin Chiu, Vanessa Vail, Thomas P. Rubash, Harry E. Berry, Daniel J. |
author_sort | Bozic, Kevin J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding the cause of failure and type of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures performed in the United States is essential in guiding research, implant design, and clinical decision making in TKA. We assessed the causes of failure and specific types of revision TKA procedures performed in the United States using newly implemented ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes related to revision TKA data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Clinical, demographic, and economic data were reviewed and analyzed from 60,355 revision TKA procedures performed in the United States between October 1, 2005 and December 31, 2006. The most common causes of revision TKA were infection (25.2%) and implant loosening (16.1%), and the most common type of revision TKA procedure reported was all component revision (35.2%). Revision TKA procedures were most commonly performed in large, urban, nonteaching hospitals in Medicare patients ages 65 to 74. The average length of hospital stay (LOS) for all revision TKA procedures was 5.1 days, and the average total charges were $49,360. However, average LOS, average charges, and procedure frequencies varied considerably by census region, hospital type, and procedure performed. Level of Evidence: Level II, economic and decision analysis. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2795838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27958382009-12-23 The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States Bozic, Kevin J. Kurtz, Steven M. Lau, Edmund Ong, Kevin Chiu, Vanessa Vail, Thomas P. Rubash, Harry E. Berry, Daniel J. Clin Orthop Relat Res Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society Understanding the cause of failure and type of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures performed in the United States is essential in guiding research, implant design, and clinical decision making in TKA. We assessed the causes of failure and specific types of revision TKA procedures performed in the United States using newly implemented ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes related to revision TKA data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Clinical, demographic, and economic data were reviewed and analyzed from 60,355 revision TKA procedures performed in the United States between October 1, 2005 and December 31, 2006. The most common causes of revision TKA were infection (25.2%) and implant loosening (16.1%), and the most common type of revision TKA procedure reported was all component revision (35.2%). Revision TKA procedures were most commonly performed in large, urban, nonteaching hospitals in Medicare patients ages 65 to 74. The average length of hospital stay (LOS) for all revision TKA procedures was 5.1 days, and the average total charges were $49,360. However, average LOS, average charges, and procedure frequencies varied considerably by census region, hospital type, and procedure performed. Level of Evidence: Level II, economic and decision analysis. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Springer-Verlag 2009-06-25 2010-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2795838/ /pubmed/19554385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society Bozic, Kevin J. Kurtz, Steven M. Lau, Edmund Ong, Kevin Chiu, Vanessa Vail, Thomas P. Rubash, Harry E. Berry, Daniel J. The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States |
title | The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States |
title_full | The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States |
title_fullStr | The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States |
title_short | The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States |
title_sort | epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the united states |
topic | Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19554385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bozickevinj theepidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT kurtzstevenm theepidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT lauedmund theepidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT ongkevin theepidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT chiuvanessa theepidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT vailthomasp theepidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT rubashharrye theepidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT berrydanielj theepidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT bozickevinj epidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT kurtzstevenm epidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT lauedmund epidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT ongkevin epidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT chiuvanessa epidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT vailthomasp epidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT rubashharrye epidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates AT berrydanielj epidemiologyofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyintheunitedstates |