Cargando…
Comparison between single-marker analysis using Merlin and multi-marker analysis using LASSO for Framingham simulated data
We compared family-based single-marker association analysis using Merlin and multi-marker analysis using LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) for the low-density lipoprotein phenotype at the first visit for all 200 replicates of the Genetic Analysis Workshop 16 Framingham simulate...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20018017 |
_version_ | 1782175471419523072 |
---|---|
author | Sung, Yun Ju Rice, Treva K Shi, Gang Gu, C Charles Rao, DC |
author_facet | Sung, Yun Ju Rice, Treva K Shi, Gang Gu, C Charles Rao, DC |
author_sort | Sung, Yun Ju |
collection | PubMed |
description | We compared family-based single-marker association analysis using Merlin and multi-marker analysis using LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) for the low-density lipoprotein phenotype at the first visit for all 200 replicates of the Genetic Analysis Workshop 16 Framingham simulated data sets. Using "answers," we selected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on chromosome 22 for comparison of results between single-marker and multi-marker analyses. For the major causal SNP rs2294207 on chromosome 22, both single-marker and multi-marker analyses provided similar results, indicating the importance of this SNP. For the 12 polygenic SNPs on the same chromosome, both single-marker and multi-marker analyses failed to provide statistically significant associations, indicating that their effects were too weak to be detected by either method. The main difference between the two methods was that for the 14 SNPs near the causal SNPs, p-values from Merlin were the next smallest, whereas LASSO often excluded these non-causal neighboring SNPs entirely from the first 10,000 models. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2795924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27959242009-12-18 Comparison between single-marker analysis using Merlin and multi-marker analysis using LASSO for Framingham simulated data Sung, Yun Ju Rice, Treva K Shi, Gang Gu, C Charles Rao, DC BMC Proc Proceedings We compared family-based single-marker association analysis using Merlin and multi-marker analysis using LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) for the low-density lipoprotein phenotype at the first visit for all 200 replicates of the Genetic Analysis Workshop 16 Framingham simulated data sets. Using "answers," we selected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on chromosome 22 for comparison of results between single-marker and multi-marker analyses. For the major causal SNP rs2294207 on chromosome 22, both single-marker and multi-marker analyses provided similar results, indicating the importance of this SNP. For the 12 polygenic SNPs on the same chromosome, both single-marker and multi-marker analyses failed to provide statistically significant associations, indicating that their effects were too weak to be detected by either method. The main difference between the two methods was that for the 14 SNPs near the causal SNPs, p-values from Merlin were the next smallest, whereas LASSO often excluded these non-causal neighboring SNPs entirely from the first 10,000 models. BioMed Central 2009-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2795924/ /pubmed/20018017 Text en Copyright ©2009 Sung et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Proceedings Sung, Yun Ju Rice, Treva K Shi, Gang Gu, C Charles Rao, DC Comparison between single-marker analysis using Merlin and multi-marker analysis using LASSO for Framingham simulated data |
title | Comparison between single-marker analysis using Merlin and multi-marker analysis using LASSO for Framingham simulated data |
title_full | Comparison between single-marker analysis using Merlin and multi-marker analysis using LASSO for Framingham simulated data |
title_fullStr | Comparison between single-marker analysis using Merlin and multi-marker analysis using LASSO for Framingham simulated data |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between single-marker analysis using Merlin and multi-marker analysis using LASSO for Framingham simulated data |
title_short | Comparison between single-marker analysis using Merlin and multi-marker analysis using LASSO for Framingham simulated data |
title_sort | comparison between single-marker analysis using merlin and multi-marker analysis using lasso for framingham simulated data |
topic | Proceedings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20018017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sungyunju comparisonbetweensinglemarkeranalysisusingmerlinandmultimarkeranalysisusinglassoforframinghamsimulateddata AT ricetrevak comparisonbetweensinglemarkeranalysisusingmerlinandmultimarkeranalysisusinglassoforframinghamsimulateddata AT shigang comparisonbetweensinglemarkeranalysisusingmerlinandmultimarkeranalysisusinglassoforframinghamsimulateddata AT guccharles comparisonbetweensinglemarkeranalysisusingmerlinandmultimarkeranalysisusinglassoforframinghamsimulateddata AT raodc comparisonbetweensinglemarkeranalysisusingmerlinandmultimarkeranalysisusinglassoforframinghamsimulateddata |