Cargando…

Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies

BACKGROUND: Individual strategies in pandemic preparedness plans may not reduce the impact of an influenza pandemic. METHODS: We searched modeling publications through PubMed and associated references from 1990 to 30 September 2009. Inclusion criteria were modeling papers quantifying the effectivene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Vernon J, Lye, David C, Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-7-76
_version_ 1782175579106181120
author Lee, Vernon J
Lye, David C
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
author_facet Lee, Vernon J
Lye, David C
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
author_sort Lee, Vernon J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individual strategies in pandemic preparedness plans may not reduce the impact of an influenza pandemic. METHODS: We searched modeling publications through PubMed and associated references from 1990 to 30 September 2009. Inclusion criteria were modeling papers quantifying the effectiveness of combination strategies, both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical. RESULTS: Nineteen modeling papers on combination strategies were selected. Four studies examined combination strategies on a global scale, 14 on single countries, and one on a small community. Stochastic individual-based modeling was used in nine studies, stochastic meta-population modeling in five, and deterministic compartmental modeling in another five. As part of combination strategies, vaccination was explored in eight studies, antiviral prophylaxis and/or treatment in 16, area or household quarantine in eight, case isolation in six, social distancing measures in 10 and air travel restriction in six studies. Two studies suggested a high probability of successful influenza epicenter containment with combination strategies under favorable conditions. During a pandemic, combination strategies delayed spread, reduced overall number of cases, and delayed and reduced peak attack rate more than individual strategies. Combination strategies remained effective at high reproductive numbers compared with single strategy. Global cooperative strategies, including redistribution of antiviral drugs, were effective in reducing the global impact and attack rates of pandemic influenza. CONCLUSION: Combination strategies increase the effectiveness of individual strategies. They include pharmaceutical (antiviral agents, antibiotics and vaccines) and non-pharmaceutical interventions (case isolation, quarantine, personal hygiene measures, social distancing and travel restriction). Local epidemiological and modeling studies are needed to validate efficacy and feasibility.
format Text
id pubmed-2797001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27970012009-12-23 Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies Lee, Vernon J Lye, David C Wilder-Smith, Annelies BMC Med Research article BACKGROUND: Individual strategies in pandemic preparedness plans may not reduce the impact of an influenza pandemic. METHODS: We searched modeling publications through PubMed and associated references from 1990 to 30 September 2009. Inclusion criteria were modeling papers quantifying the effectiveness of combination strategies, both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical. RESULTS: Nineteen modeling papers on combination strategies were selected. Four studies examined combination strategies on a global scale, 14 on single countries, and one on a small community. Stochastic individual-based modeling was used in nine studies, stochastic meta-population modeling in five, and deterministic compartmental modeling in another five. As part of combination strategies, vaccination was explored in eight studies, antiviral prophylaxis and/or treatment in 16, area or household quarantine in eight, case isolation in six, social distancing measures in 10 and air travel restriction in six studies. Two studies suggested a high probability of successful influenza epicenter containment with combination strategies under favorable conditions. During a pandemic, combination strategies delayed spread, reduced overall number of cases, and delayed and reduced peak attack rate more than individual strategies. Combination strategies remained effective at high reproductive numbers compared with single strategy. Global cooperative strategies, including redistribution of antiviral drugs, were effective in reducing the global impact and attack rates of pandemic influenza. CONCLUSION: Combination strategies increase the effectiveness of individual strategies. They include pharmaceutical (antiviral agents, antibiotics and vaccines) and non-pharmaceutical interventions (case isolation, quarantine, personal hygiene measures, social distancing and travel restriction). Local epidemiological and modeling studies are needed to validate efficacy and feasibility. BioMed Central 2009-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2797001/ /pubmed/20003249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-7-76 Text en Copyright ©2009 Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Lee, Vernon J
Lye, David C
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies
title Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies
title_full Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies
title_fullStr Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies
title_full_unstemmed Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies
title_short Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies
title_sort combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-7-76
work_keys_str_mv AT leevernonj combinationstrategiesforpandemicinfluenzaresponseasystematicreviewofmathematicalmodelingstudies
AT lyedavidc combinationstrategiesforpandemicinfluenzaresponseasystematicreviewofmathematicalmodelingstudies
AT wildersmithannelies combinationstrategiesforpandemicinfluenzaresponseasystematicreviewofmathematicalmodelingstudies