Cargando…

Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication

BACKGROUND: Early detection of colorectal cancer through timely follow-up of positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests (FOBTs) remains a challenge. In our previous work, we found 40% of positive FOBT results eligible for colonoscopy had no documented response by a treating clinician at two weeks despite pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Hardeep, Wilson, Lindsey, Petersen, Laura A, Sawhney, Mona K, Reis, Brian, Espadas, Donna, Sittig, Dean F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-49
_version_ 1782175630263058432
author Singh, Hardeep
Wilson, Lindsey
Petersen, Laura A
Sawhney, Mona K
Reis, Brian
Espadas, Donna
Sittig, Dean F
author_facet Singh, Hardeep
Wilson, Lindsey
Petersen, Laura A
Sawhney, Mona K
Reis, Brian
Espadas, Donna
Sittig, Dean F
author_sort Singh, Hardeep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early detection of colorectal cancer through timely follow-up of positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests (FOBTs) remains a challenge. In our previous work, we found 40% of positive FOBT results eligible for colonoscopy had no documented response by a treating clinician at two weeks despite procedures for electronic result notification. We determined if technical and/or workflow-related aspects of automated communication in the electronic health record could lead to the lack of response. METHODS: Using both qualitative and quantitative methods, we evaluated positive FOBT communication in the electronic health record of a large, urban facility between May 2008 and March 2009. We identified the source of test result communication breakdown, and developed an intervention to fix the problem. Explicit medical record reviews measured timely follow-up (defined as response within 30 days of positive FOBT) pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: Data from 11 interviews and tracking information from 490 FOBT alerts revealed that the software intended to alert primary care practitioners (PCPs) of positive FOBT results was not configured correctly and over a third of positive FOBTs were not transmitted to PCPs. Upon correction of the technical problem, lack of timely follow-up decreased immediately from 29.9% to 5.4% (p < 0.01) and was sustained at month 4 following the intervention. CONCLUSION: Electronic communication of positive FOBT results should be monitored to avoid limiting colorectal cancer screening benefits. Robust quality assurance and oversight systems are needed to achieve this. Our methods may be useful for others seeking to improve follow-up of FOBTs in their systems.
format Text
id pubmed-2797509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27975092009-12-24 Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication Singh, Hardeep Wilson, Lindsey Petersen, Laura A Sawhney, Mona K Reis, Brian Espadas, Donna Sittig, Dean F BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Early detection of colorectal cancer through timely follow-up of positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests (FOBTs) remains a challenge. In our previous work, we found 40% of positive FOBT results eligible for colonoscopy had no documented response by a treating clinician at two weeks despite procedures for electronic result notification. We determined if technical and/or workflow-related aspects of automated communication in the electronic health record could lead to the lack of response. METHODS: Using both qualitative and quantitative methods, we evaluated positive FOBT communication in the electronic health record of a large, urban facility between May 2008 and March 2009. We identified the source of test result communication breakdown, and developed an intervention to fix the problem. Explicit medical record reviews measured timely follow-up (defined as response within 30 days of positive FOBT) pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: Data from 11 interviews and tracking information from 490 FOBT alerts revealed that the software intended to alert primary care practitioners (PCPs) of positive FOBT results was not configured correctly and over a third of positive FOBTs were not transmitted to PCPs. Upon correction of the technical problem, lack of timely follow-up decreased immediately from 29.9% to 5.4% (p < 0.01) and was sustained at month 4 following the intervention. CONCLUSION: Electronic communication of positive FOBT results should be monitored to avoid limiting colorectal cancer screening benefits. Robust quality assurance and oversight systems are needed to achieve this. Our methods may be useful for others seeking to improve follow-up of FOBTs in their systems. BioMed Central 2009-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2797509/ /pubmed/20003236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-49 Text en Copyright ©2009 Singh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Singh, Hardeep
Wilson, Lindsey
Petersen, Laura A
Sawhney, Mona K
Reis, Brian
Espadas, Donna
Sittig, Dean F
Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication
title Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication
title_full Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication
title_fullStr Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication
title_full_unstemmed Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication
title_short Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication
title_sort improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-49
work_keys_str_mv AT singhhardeep improvingfollowupofabnormalcancerscreensusingelectronichealthrecordstrustbutverifytestresultcommunication
AT wilsonlindsey improvingfollowupofabnormalcancerscreensusingelectronichealthrecordstrustbutverifytestresultcommunication
AT petersenlauraa improvingfollowupofabnormalcancerscreensusingelectronichealthrecordstrustbutverifytestresultcommunication
AT sawhneymonak improvingfollowupofabnormalcancerscreensusingelectronichealthrecordstrustbutverifytestresultcommunication
AT reisbrian improvingfollowupofabnormalcancerscreensusingelectronichealthrecordstrustbutverifytestresultcommunication
AT espadasdonna improvingfollowupofabnormalcancerscreensusingelectronichealthrecordstrustbutverifytestresultcommunication
AT sittigdeanf improvingfollowupofabnormalcancerscreensusingelectronichealthrecordstrustbutverifytestresultcommunication