Cargando…

Technical Performance and Reflection Capacity of the Anaesthetic Conserving Device—A Bench Study with Isoflurane and Sevoflurane

OBJECTIVE: The anaesthetic conserving device (AnaConDa(®), Sedana Medical, Sundbyberg, Sweden) facilitates administration of isoflurane or sevoflurane by liquid infusion. An anaesthetic reflector inside the device conserves exhaled anaesthetic and re-supplies it during inspiration. In this bench stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meiser, Andreas, Bellgardt, Martin, Belda, Javier, Röhm, Kerstin, Laubenthal, Heinz, Sirtl, Clemens
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2799001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19189222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-008-9158-4
_version_ 1782175758680064000
author Meiser, Andreas
Bellgardt, Martin
Belda, Javier
Röhm, Kerstin
Laubenthal, Heinz
Sirtl, Clemens
author_facet Meiser, Andreas
Bellgardt, Martin
Belda, Javier
Röhm, Kerstin
Laubenthal, Heinz
Sirtl, Clemens
author_sort Meiser, Andreas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The anaesthetic conserving device (AnaConDa(®), Sedana Medical, Sundbyberg, Sweden) facilitates administration of isoflurane or sevoflurane by liquid infusion. An anaesthetic reflector inside the device conserves exhaled anaesthetic and re-supplies it during inspiration. In this bench study, we examined the influence of infusion rates and ventilatory settings on the resulting anaesthetic concentrations on patient (C(pat)) and ventilator side of the reflector (C(loss)) to describe its technical performance. METHODS: A Puritan Bennett 840 ICU ventilator (Pleasanton, US), AnaConDa(®), and a test lung (3 l-chloroprene-bag) were assembled. Infusion rates (IR, 0.2-50 ml h(-)), respiratory rates (RR, 5-40 breaths min(-1)), and tidal volumes (V(T), 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 l) were varied. C(pat) was measured via a thin catheter in the middle of the 3 l-bag in steady state (online data storage and averaging over >10 min). C(loss) was calculated from IR (to yield the volume of vapour per unit of time), and expired minute volume (in which the vapour is diluted) on the assumption that, in the steady state, input by liquid infusion equals output through the reflector. RESULTS: At lower concentrations (C(pat)< 1 vol%) the ratio C(loss)/C(pat) was constant (R(C) = 0.096 ±±0.012) for all combinations of IR, RR and V(T), both for isoflurane and sevoflurane. The device could efficiently reflect up to 10 ml vapour per breath (e.g. 2 vol% in 0.5 l). When exceeding this capacity, surplus vapour “spilled over” and R(C) markedly increased indicating decreased performance. CONCLUSIONS: The triple product minute volume times R(C) times C(pat) describes anaesthetic losses through the reflector. It can easily be calculated as long as the 10 ml reflection capacity is not exceeded and thus R(C) is constant. Increased minute ventilation necessitates increasing the IR to keep C(pat) constant. When using large V(T) and high C(pat) “spill over” occurs. This effect offers some protection against an inadvertent overdose.
format Text
id pubmed-2799001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27990012009-12-30 Technical Performance and Reflection Capacity of the Anaesthetic Conserving Device—A Bench Study with Isoflurane and Sevoflurane Meiser, Andreas Bellgardt, Martin Belda, Javier Röhm, Kerstin Laubenthal, Heinz Sirtl, Clemens J Clin Monit Comput Article OBJECTIVE: The anaesthetic conserving device (AnaConDa(®), Sedana Medical, Sundbyberg, Sweden) facilitates administration of isoflurane or sevoflurane by liquid infusion. An anaesthetic reflector inside the device conserves exhaled anaesthetic and re-supplies it during inspiration. In this bench study, we examined the influence of infusion rates and ventilatory settings on the resulting anaesthetic concentrations on patient (C(pat)) and ventilator side of the reflector (C(loss)) to describe its technical performance. METHODS: A Puritan Bennett 840 ICU ventilator (Pleasanton, US), AnaConDa(®), and a test lung (3 l-chloroprene-bag) were assembled. Infusion rates (IR, 0.2-50 ml h(-)), respiratory rates (RR, 5-40 breaths min(-1)), and tidal volumes (V(T), 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 l) were varied. C(pat) was measured via a thin catheter in the middle of the 3 l-bag in steady state (online data storage and averaging over >10 min). C(loss) was calculated from IR (to yield the volume of vapour per unit of time), and expired minute volume (in which the vapour is diluted) on the assumption that, in the steady state, input by liquid infusion equals output through the reflector. RESULTS: At lower concentrations (C(pat)< 1 vol%) the ratio C(loss)/C(pat) was constant (R(C) = 0.096 ±±0.012) for all combinations of IR, RR and V(T), both for isoflurane and sevoflurane. The device could efficiently reflect up to 10 ml vapour per breath (e.g. 2 vol% in 0.5 l). When exceeding this capacity, surplus vapour “spilled over” and R(C) markedly increased indicating decreased performance. CONCLUSIONS: The triple product minute volume times R(C) times C(pat) describes anaesthetic losses through the reflector. It can easily be calculated as long as the 10 ml reflection capacity is not exceeded and thus R(C) is constant. Increased minute ventilation necessitates increasing the IR to keep C(pat) constant. When using large V(T) and high C(pat) “spill over” occurs. This effect offers some protection against an inadvertent overdose. Springer Netherlands 2009-02-03 2009-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2799001/ /pubmed/19189222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-008-9158-4 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009
spellingShingle Article
Meiser, Andreas
Bellgardt, Martin
Belda, Javier
Röhm, Kerstin
Laubenthal, Heinz
Sirtl, Clemens
Technical Performance and Reflection Capacity of the Anaesthetic Conserving Device—A Bench Study with Isoflurane and Sevoflurane
title Technical Performance and Reflection Capacity of the Anaesthetic Conserving Device—A Bench Study with Isoflurane and Sevoflurane
title_full Technical Performance and Reflection Capacity of the Anaesthetic Conserving Device—A Bench Study with Isoflurane and Sevoflurane
title_fullStr Technical Performance and Reflection Capacity of the Anaesthetic Conserving Device—A Bench Study with Isoflurane and Sevoflurane
title_full_unstemmed Technical Performance and Reflection Capacity of the Anaesthetic Conserving Device—A Bench Study with Isoflurane and Sevoflurane
title_short Technical Performance and Reflection Capacity of the Anaesthetic Conserving Device—A Bench Study with Isoflurane and Sevoflurane
title_sort technical performance and reflection capacity of the anaesthetic conserving device—a bench study with isoflurane and sevoflurane
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2799001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19189222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-008-9158-4
work_keys_str_mv AT meiserandreas technicalperformanceandreflectioncapacityoftheanaestheticconservingdeviceabenchstudywithisofluraneandsevoflurane
AT bellgardtmartin technicalperformanceandreflectioncapacityoftheanaestheticconservingdeviceabenchstudywithisofluraneandsevoflurane
AT beldajavier technicalperformanceandreflectioncapacityoftheanaestheticconservingdeviceabenchstudywithisofluraneandsevoflurane
AT rohmkerstin technicalperformanceandreflectioncapacityoftheanaestheticconservingdeviceabenchstudywithisofluraneandsevoflurane
AT laubenthalheinz technicalperformanceandreflectioncapacityoftheanaestheticconservingdeviceabenchstudywithisofluraneandsevoflurane
AT sirtlclemens technicalperformanceandreflectioncapacityoftheanaestheticconservingdeviceabenchstudywithisofluraneandsevoflurane