Cargando…
In silico approaches to study mass and energy flows in microbial consortia: a syntrophic case study
BACKGROUND: Three methods were developed for the application of stoichiometry-based network analysis approaches including elementary mode analysis to the study of mass and energy flows in microbial communities. Each has distinct advantages and disadvantages suitable for analyzing systems with differ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2799449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-3-114 |
_version_ | 1782175787072356352 |
---|---|
author | Taffs, Reed Aston, John E Brileya, Kristen Jay, Zackary Klatt, Christian G McGlynn, Shawn Mallette, Natasha Montross, Scott Gerlach, Robin Inskeep, William P Ward, David M Carlson, Ross P |
author_facet | Taffs, Reed Aston, John E Brileya, Kristen Jay, Zackary Klatt, Christian G McGlynn, Shawn Mallette, Natasha Montross, Scott Gerlach, Robin Inskeep, William P Ward, David M Carlson, Ross P |
author_sort | Taffs, Reed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Three methods were developed for the application of stoichiometry-based network analysis approaches including elementary mode analysis to the study of mass and energy flows in microbial communities. Each has distinct advantages and disadvantages suitable for analyzing systems with different degrees of complexity and a priori knowledge. These approaches were tested and compared using data from the thermophilic, phototrophic mat communities from Octopus and Mushroom Springs in Yellowstone National Park (USA). The models were based on three distinct microbial guilds: oxygenic phototrophs, filamentous anoxygenic phototrophs, and sulfate-reducing bacteria. Two phases, day and night, were modeled to account for differences in the sources of mass and energy and the routes available for their exchange. RESULTS: The in silico models were used to explore fundamental questions in ecology including the prediction of and explanation for measured relative abundances of primary producers in the mat, theoretical tradeoffs between overall productivity and the generation of toxic by-products, and the relative robustness of various guild interactions. CONCLUSION: The three modeling approaches represent a flexible toolbox for creating cellular metabolic networks to study microbial communities on scales ranging from cells to ecosystems. A comparison of the three methods highlights considerations for selecting the one most appropriate for a given microbial system. For instance, communities represented only by metagenomic data can be modeled using the pooled method which analyzes a community's total metabolic potential without attempting to partition enzymes to different organisms. Systems with extensive a priori information on microbial guilds can be represented using the compartmentalized technique, employing distinct control volumes to separate guild-appropriate enzymes and metabolites. If the complexity of a compartmentalized network creates an unacceptable computational burden, the nested analysis approach permits greater scalability at the cost of more user intervention through multiple rounds of pathway analysis. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2799449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27994492009-12-30 In silico approaches to study mass and energy flows in microbial consortia: a syntrophic case study Taffs, Reed Aston, John E Brileya, Kristen Jay, Zackary Klatt, Christian G McGlynn, Shawn Mallette, Natasha Montross, Scott Gerlach, Robin Inskeep, William P Ward, David M Carlson, Ross P BMC Syst Biol Research article BACKGROUND: Three methods were developed for the application of stoichiometry-based network analysis approaches including elementary mode analysis to the study of mass and energy flows in microbial communities. Each has distinct advantages and disadvantages suitable for analyzing systems with different degrees of complexity and a priori knowledge. These approaches were tested and compared using data from the thermophilic, phototrophic mat communities from Octopus and Mushroom Springs in Yellowstone National Park (USA). The models were based on three distinct microbial guilds: oxygenic phototrophs, filamentous anoxygenic phototrophs, and sulfate-reducing bacteria. Two phases, day and night, were modeled to account for differences in the sources of mass and energy and the routes available for their exchange. RESULTS: The in silico models were used to explore fundamental questions in ecology including the prediction of and explanation for measured relative abundances of primary producers in the mat, theoretical tradeoffs between overall productivity and the generation of toxic by-products, and the relative robustness of various guild interactions. CONCLUSION: The three modeling approaches represent a flexible toolbox for creating cellular metabolic networks to study microbial communities on scales ranging from cells to ecosystems. A comparison of the three methods highlights considerations for selecting the one most appropriate for a given microbial system. For instance, communities represented only by metagenomic data can be modeled using the pooled method which analyzes a community's total metabolic potential without attempting to partition enzymes to different organisms. Systems with extensive a priori information on microbial guilds can be represented using the compartmentalized technique, employing distinct control volumes to separate guild-appropriate enzymes and metabolites. If the complexity of a compartmentalized network creates an unacceptable computational burden, the nested analysis approach permits greater scalability at the cost of more user intervention through multiple rounds of pathway analysis. BioMed Central 2009-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2799449/ /pubmed/20003240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-3-114 Text en Copyright ©2009 Taffs et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Taffs, Reed Aston, John E Brileya, Kristen Jay, Zackary Klatt, Christian G McGlynn, Shawn Mallette, Natasha Montross, Scott Gerlach, Robin Inskeep, William P Ward, David M Carlson, Ross P In silico approaches to study mass and energy flows in microbial consortia: a syntrophic case study |
title | In silico approaches to study mass and energy flows in microbial consortia: a syntrophic case study |
title_full | In silico approaches to study mass and energy flows in microbial consortia: a syntrophic case study |
title_fullStr | In silico approaches to study mass and energy flows in microbial consortia: a syntrophic case study |
title_full_unstemmed | In silico approaches to study mass and energy flows in microbial consortia: a syntrophic case study |
title_short | In silico approaches to study mass and energy flows in microbial consortia: a syntrophic case study |
title_sort | in silico approaches to study mass and energy flows in microbial consortia: a syntrophic case study |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2799449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-3-114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taffsreed insilicoapproachestostudymassandenergyflowsinmicrobialconsortiaasyntrophiccasestudy AT astonjohne insilicoapproachestostudymassandenergyflowsinmicrobialconsortiaasyntrophiccasestudy AT brileyakristen insilicoapproachestostudymassandenergyflowsinmicrobialconsortiaasyntrophiccasestudy AT jayzackary insilicoapproachestostudymassandenergyflowsinmicrobialconsortiaasyntrophiccasestudy AT klattchristiang insilicoapproachestostudymassandenergyflowsinmicrobialconsortiaasyntrophiccasestudy AT mcglynnshawn insilicoapproachestostudymassandenergyflowsinmicrobialconsortiaasyntrophiccasestudy AT mallettenatasha insilicoapproachestostudymassandenergyflowsinmicrobialconsortiaasyntrophiccasestudy AT montrossscott insilicoapproachestostudymassandenergyflowsinmicrobialconsortiaasyntrophiccasestudy AT gerlachrobin insilicoapproachestostudymassandenergyflowsinmicrobialconsortiaasyntrophiccasestudy AT inskeepwilliamp insilicoapproachestostudymassandenergyflowsinmicrobialconsortiaasyntrophiccasestudy AT warddavidm insilicoapproachestostudymassandenergyflowsinmicrobialconsortiaasyntrophiccasestudy AT carlsonrossp insilicoapproachestostudymassandenergyflowsinmicrobialconsortiaasyntrophiccasestudy |