Cargando…
Which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents after previous failure of an anti-TNF agent?
BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to TNF antagonists (aTNFs) may switch to an alternative aTNF or start treatment from a different class of drugs, such as rituximab (RTX). It remains unclear in which clinical settings these therapeutic strategies offer m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2800201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19416802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.105064 |
_version_ | 1782175849839067136 |
---|---|
author | Finckh, A Ciurea, A Brulhart, L Möller, B Walker, U A Courvoisier, D Kyburz, D Dudler, J Gabay, C Arthritis, on the behalf of the doctors of the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Programme for Rheumatoid |
author_facet | Finckh, A Ciurea, A Brulhart, L Möller, B Walker, U A Courvoisier, D Kyburz, D Dudler, J Gabay, C Arthritis, on the behalf of the doctors of the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Programme for Rheumatoid |
author_sort | Finckh, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to TNF antagonists (aTNFs) may switch to an alternative aTNF or start treatment from a different class of drugs, such as rituximab (RTX). It remains unclear in which clinical settings these therapeutic strategies offer most benefit. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effectiveness of RTX versus alternative aTNFs on RA disease activity in different subgroups of patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of patients with RA who discontinued at least one aTNF and subsequently received either RTX or an alternative aTNF, nested within the Swiss RA registry (SCQM-RA) was carried out. The primary outcome, longitudinal improvement in 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28), was analysed using multivariate regression models for longitudinal data and adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 318 patients with RA included; 155 received RTX and 163 received an alternative aTNF. The relative benefit of RTX varied with the type of prior aTNF failure: when the motive for switching was ineffectiveness to previous aTNFs, the longitudinal improvement in DAS28 was significantly better with RTX than with an alternative aTNF (p = 0.03; at 6 months, −1.34 (95% CI −1.54 to −1.15) vs −0.93 (95% CI −1.28 to −0.59), respectively). When the motive for switching was other causes, the longitudinal improvement in DAS28 was similar for RTX and alternative aTNFs (p = 0.40). These results were not significantly modified by the number of previous aTNF failures, the type of aTNF switches, or the presence of co-treatment with a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. CONCLUSION: This observational study suggests that in patients with RA who have stopped a previous aTNF treatment because of ineffectiveness changing to RTX is more effective than switching to an alternative aTNF. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2800201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28002012010-02-04 Which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents after previous failure of an anti-TNF agent? Finckh, A Ciurea, A Brulhart, L Möller, B Walker, U A Courvoisier, D Kyburz, D Dudler, J Gabay, C Arthritis, on the behalf of the doctors of the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Programme for Rheumatoid Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and epidemiological research BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to TNF antagonists (aTNFs) may switch to an alternative aTNF or start treatment from a different class of drugs, such as rituximab (RTX). It remains unclear in which clinical settings these therapeutic strategies offer most benefit. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effectiveness of RTX versus alternative aTNFs on RA disease activity in different subgroups of patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of patients with RA who discontinued at least one aTNF and subsequently received either RTX or an alternative aTNF, nested within the Swiss RA registry (SCQM-RA) was carried out. The primary outcome, longitudinal improvement in 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28), was analysed using multivariate regression models for longitudinal data and adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 318 patients with RA included; 155 received RTX and 163 received an alternative aTNF. The relative benefit of RTX varied with the type of prior aTNF failure: when the motive for switching was ineffectiveness to previous aTNFs, the longitudinal improvement in DAS28 was significantly better with RTX than with an alternative aTNF (p = 0.03; at 6 months, −1.34 (95% CI −1.54 to −1.15) vs −0.93 (95% CI −1.28 to −0.59), respectively). When the motive for switching was other causes, the longitudinal improvement in DAS28 was similar for RTX and alternative aTNFs (p = 0.40). These results were not significantly modified by the number of previous aTNF failures, the type of aTNF switches, or the presence of co-treatment with a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. CONCLUSION: This observational study suggests that in patients with RA who have stopped a previous aTNF treatment because of ineffectiveness changing to RTX is more effective than switching to an alternative aTNF. BMJ Group 2010-02 2009-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2800201/ /pubmed/19416802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.105064 Text en © Finckh et al 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical and epidemiological research Finckh, A Ciurea, A Brulhart, L Möller, B Walker, U A Courvoisier, D Kyburz, D Dudler, J Gabay, C Arthritis, on the behalf of the doctors of the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Programme for Rheumatoid Which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents after previous failure of an anti-TNF agent? |
title | Which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents after previous failure of an anti-TNF agent? |
title_full | Which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents after previous failure of an anti-TNF agent? |
title_fullStr | Which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents after previous failure of an anti-TNF agent? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents after previous failure of an anti-TNF agent? |
title_short | Which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents after previous failure of an anti-TNF agent? |
title_sort | which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (tnf) agents after previous failure of an anti-tnf agent? |
topic | Clinical and epidemiological research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2800201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19416802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.105064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT finckha whichsubgroupofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisbenefitsfromswitchingtorituximabversusalternativeantitumournecrosisfactortnfagentsafterpreviousfailureofanantitnfagent AT ciureaa whichsubgroupofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisbenefitsfromswitchingtorituximabversusalternativeantitumournecrosisfactortnfagentsafterpreviousfailureofanantitnfagent AT brulhartl whichsubgroupofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisbenefitsfromswitchingtorituximabversusalternativeantitumournecrosisfactortnfagentsafterpreviousfailureofanantitnfagent AT mollerb whichsubgroupofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisbenefitsfromswitchingtorituximabversusalternativeantitumournecrosisfactortnfagentsafterpreviousfailureofanantitnfagent AT walkerua whichsubgroupofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisbenefitsfromswitchingtorituximabversusalternativeantitumournecrosisfactortnfagentsafterpreviousfailureofanantitnfagent AT courvoisierd whichsubgroupofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisbenefitsfromswitchingtorituximabversusalternativeantitumournecrosisfactortnfagentsafterpreviousfailureofanantitnfagent AT kyburzd whichsubgroupofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisbenefitsfromswitchingtorituximabversusalternativeantitumournecrosisfactortnfagentsafterpreviousfailureofanantitnfagent AT dudlerj whichsubgroupofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisbenefitsfromswitchingtorituximabversusalternativeantitumournecrosisfactortnfagentsafterpreviousfailureofanantitnfagent AT gabayc whichsubgroupofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisbenefitsfromswitchingtorituximabversusalternativeantitumournecrosisfactortnfagentsafterpreviousfailureofanantitnfagent AT arthritisonthebehalfofthedoctorsoftheswissclinicalqualitymanagementprogrammeforrheumatoid whichsubgroupofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisbenefitsfromswitchingtorituximabversusalternativeantitumournecrosisfactortnfagentsafterpreviousfailureofanantitnfagent |