Cargando…
Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and identify predictors of good clinical response for joint and skin lesions. METHODS: Patients received adalimumab 40 mg every other week in addition to standard therapy in this prospective, 12-week,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2800202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19815494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.111856 |
_version_ | 1782175850072899584 |
---|---|
author | Van den Bosch, F Manger, B Goupille, P McHugh, N Rødevand, E Holck, P van Vollenhoven, R F Leirisalo-Repo, M FitzGerald, O Kron, M Frank, M Kary, S Kupper, H |
author_facet | Van den Bosch, F Manger, B Goupille, P McHugh, N Rødevand, E Holck, P van Vollenhoven, R F Leirisalo-Repo, M FitzGerald, O Kron, M Frank, M Kary, S Kupper, H |
author_sort | Van den Bosch, F |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and identify predictors of good clinical response for joint and skin lesions. METHODS: Patients received adalimumab 40 mg every other week in addition to standard therapy in this prospective, 12-week, open-label, uncontrolled study. Four definitions of good clinical response were used: ⩾50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR50), good response according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines, a ⩾3-grade improvement in Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (PGA) and a ⩾50% improvement in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). Response predictors were determined by logistic regression with backward elimination (selection level was 5%). RESULTS: Of 442 patients, 94% completed 12 weeks of treatment. At week 12, 74%, 51% and 32% of the patients had achieved ACR20, 50 and 70, respectively; 87% and 61% experienced moderate and good responses according to EULAR criteria, respectively. The percentage of patients with PGA results of “clear/almost clear” increased from 34% (baseline) to 68%. The mean NAPSI score was reduced by 44%. No new safety signals were detected. A lower Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, greater pain assessment, male sex and absence of systemic glucocorticoid therapy were strongly associated with achievement of ACR50 and good response according to EULAR criteria. In addition, greater C-reactive protein concentration and polyarthritis predicted ACR50, and non-involvement of large joints predicted a good response according to EULAR criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab was effective in patients with PsA. Lower impairment of physical function, greater pain, male sex and no systemic treatment with glucocorticoids were factors that increased the chance of achieving a good clinical response. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2800202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28002022010-02-04 Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions Van den Bosch, F Manger, B Goupille, P McHugh, N Rødevand, E Holck, P van Vollenhoven, R F Leirisalo-Repo, M FitzGerald, O Kron, M Frank, M Kary, S Kupper, H Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and epidemiological research OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and identify predictors of good clinical response for joint and skin lesions. METHODS: Patients received adalimumab 40 mg every other week in addition to standard therapy in this prospective, 12-week, open-label, uncontrolled study. Four definitions of good clinical response were used: ⩾50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR50), good response according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines, a ⩾3-grade improvement in Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (PGA) and a ⩾50% improvement in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). Response predictors were determined by logistic regression with backward elimination (selection level was 5%). RESULTS: Of 442 patients, 94% completed 12 weeks of treatment. At week 12, 74%, 51% and 32% of the patients had achieved ACR20, 50 and 70, respectively; 87% and 61% experienced moderate and good responses according to EULAR criteria, respectively. The percentage of patients with PGA results of “clear/almost clear” increased from 34% (baseline) to 68%. The mean NAPSI score was reduced by 44%. No new safety signals were detected. A lower Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, greater pain assessment, male sex and absence of systemic glucocorticoid therapy were strongly associated with achievement of ACR50 and good response according to EULAR criteria. In addition, greater C-reactive protein concentration and polyarthritis predicted ACR50, and non-involvement of large joints predicted a good response according to EULAR criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab was effective in patients with PsA. Lower impairment of physical function, greater pain, male sex and no systemic treatment with glucocorticoids were factors that increased the chance of achieving a good clinical response. BMJ Group 2010-02 2009-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2800202/ /pubmed/19815494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.111856 Text en © Van den Bosch et al 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical and epidemiological research Van den Bosch, F Manger, B Goupille, P McHugh, N Rødevand, E Holck, P van Vollenhoven, R F Leirisalo-Repo, M FitzGerald, O Kron, M Frank, M Kary, S Kupper, H Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions |
title | Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions |
title_full | Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions |
title_short | Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions |
title_sort | effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions |
topic | Clinical and epidemiological research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2800202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19815494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.111856 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenboschf effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions AT mangerb effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions AT goupillep effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions AT mchughn effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions AT rødevande effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions AT holckp effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions AT vanvollenhovenrf effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions AT leirisalorepom effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions AT fitzgeraldo effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions AT kronm effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions AT frankm effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions AT karys effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions AT kupperh effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions |