Cargando…

Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and identify predictors of good clinical response for joint and skin lesions. METHODS: Patients received adalimumab 40 mg every other week in addition to standard therapy in this prospective, 12-week,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van den Bosch, F, Manger, B, Goupille, P, McHugh, N, Rødevand, E, Holck, P, van Vollenhoven, R F, Leirisalo-Repo, M, FitzGerald, O, Kron, M, Frank, M, Kary, S, Kupper, H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2800202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19815494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.111856
_version_ 1782175850072899584
author Van den Bosch, F
Manger, B
Goupille, P
McHugh, N
Rødevand, E
Holck, P
van Vollenhoven, R F
Leirisalo-Repo, M
FitzGerald, O
Kron, M
Frank, M
Kary, S
Kupper, H
author_facet Van den Bosch, F
Manger, B
Goupille, P
McHugh, N
Rødevand, E
Holck, P
van Vollenhoven, R F
Leirisalo-Repo, M
FitzGerald, O
Kron, M
Frank, M
Kary, S
Kupper, H
author_sort Van den Bosch, F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and identify predictors of good clinical response for joint and skin lesions. METHODS: Patients received adalimumab 40 mg every other week in addition to standard therapy in this prospective, 12-week, open-label, uncontrolled study. Four definitions of good clinical response were used: ⩾50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR50), good response according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines, a ⩾3-grade improvement in Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (PGA) and a ⩾50% improvement in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). Response predictors were determined by logistic regression with backward elimination (selection level was 5%). RESULTS: Of 442 patients, 94% completed 12 weeks of treatment. At week 12, 74%, 51% and 32% of the patients had achieved ACR20, 50 and 70, respectively; 87% and 61% experienced moderate and good responses according to EULAR criteria, respectively. The percentage of patients with PGA results of “clear/almost clear” increased from 34% (baseline) to 68%. The mean NAPSI score was reduced by 44%. No new safety signals were detected. A lower Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, greater pain assessment, male sex and absence of systemic glucocorticoid therapy were strongly associated with achievement of ACR50 and good response according to EULAR criteria. In addition, greater C-reactive protein concentration and polyarthritis predicted ACR50, and non-involvement of large joints predicted a good response according to EULAR criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab was effective in patients with PsA. Lower impairment of physical function, greater pain, male sex and no systemic treatment with glucocorticoids were factors that increased the chance of achieving a good clinical response.
format Text
id pubmed-2800202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28002022010-02-04 Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions Van den Bosch, F Manger, B Goupille, P McHugh, N Rødevand, E Holck, P van Vollenhoven, R F Leirisalo-Repo, M FitzGerald, O Kron, M Frank, M Kary, S Kupper, H Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and epidemiological research OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and identify predictors of good clinical response for joint and skin lesions. METHODS: Patients received adalimumab 40 mg every other week in addition to standard therapy in this prospective, 12-week, open-label, uncontrolled study. Four definitions of good clinical response were used: ⩾50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR50), good response according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines, a ⩾3-grade improvement in Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (PGA) and a ⩾50% improvement in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). Response predictors were determined by logistic regression with backward elimination (selection level was 5%). RESULTS: Of 442 patients, 94% completed 12 weeks of treatment. At week 12, 74%, 51% and 32% of the patients had achieved ACR20, 50 and 70, respectively; 87% and 61% experienced moderate and good responses according to EULAR criteria, respectively. The percentage of patients with PGA results of “clear/almost clear” increased from 34% (baseline) to 68%. The mean NAPSI score was reduced by 44%. No new safety signals were detected. A lower Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, greater pain assessment, male sex and absence of systemic glucocorticoid therapy were strongly associated with achievement of ACR50 and good response according to EULAR criteria. In addition, greater C-reactive protein concentration and polyarthritis predicted ACR50, and non-involvement of large joints predicted a good response according to EULAR criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab was effective in patients with PsA. Lower impairment of physical function, greater pain, male sex and no systemic treatment with glucocorticoids were factors that increased the chance of achieving a good clinical response. BMJ Group 2010-02 2009-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2800202/ /pubmed/19815494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.111856 Text en © Van den Bosch et al 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical and epidemiological research
Van den Bosch, F
Manger, B
Goupille, P
McHugh, N
Rødevand, E
Holck, P
van Vollenhoven, R F
Leirisalo-Repo, M
FitzGerald, O
Kron, M
Frank, M
Kary, S
Kupper, H
Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions
title Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions
title_full Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions
title_fullStr Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions
title_short Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions
title_sort effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with active psoriatic arthritis and predictors of good clinical responses for arthritis, skin and nail lesions
topic Clinical and epidemiological research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2800202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19815494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.111856
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenboschf effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions
AT mangerb effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions
AT goupillep effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions
AT mchughn effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions
AT rødevande effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions
AT holckp effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions
AT vanvollenhovenrf effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions
AT leirisalorepom effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions
AT fitzgeraldo effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions
AT kronm effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions
AT frankm effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions
AT karys effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions
AT kupperh effectivenessofadalimumabintreatingpatientswithactivepsoriaticarthritisandpredictorsofgoodclinicalresponsesforarthritisskinandnaillesions