Cargando…

Anogenital Distance from Birth to 2 Years: a Population Study

BACKGROUND: Anogenital distance (AGD) is sexually dimorphic in rodents and humans, being 2- to 2.5-fold greater in males. It is a reliable marker of androgen and antiandrogen effects in rodent reproductive toxicologic studies. Data on AGD in humans are sparse, with no longitudinal data collected dur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thankamony, Ajay, Ong, Ken K., Dunger, David B., Acerini, Carlo L., Hughes, Ieuan A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2801188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20049133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900881
_version_ 1782175914519429120
author Thankamony, Ajay
Ong, Ken K.
Dunger, David B.
Acerini, Carlo L.
Hughes, Ieuan A.
author_facet Thankamony, Ajay
Ong, Ken K.
Dunger, David B.
Acerini, Carlo L.
Hughes, Ieuan A.
author_sort Thankamony, Ajay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anogenital distance (AGD) is sexually dimorphic in rodents and humans, being 2- to 2.5-fold greater in males. It is a reliable marker of androgen and antiandrogen effects in rodent reproductive toxicologic studies. Data on AGD in humans are sparse, with no longitudinal data collected during infancy. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine AGD from birth to 2 years in males and females and relate this to other anthropometric measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infants were recruited from the Cambridge Baby Growth Study. AGD was measured from the center of the anus to the base of the scrotum in males and to the posterior fourchette in females. Measurements were performed at birth and at 3, 12, 18, and 24 months of age. RESULTS: Data included 2,168 longitudinal AGD measurements from 463 male and 426 female full-term infants (median = 2 measurements per infant). Mean AGD (± SD) at birth was 19.8 ± 6.1 mm in males and 9.1 ± 2.8 mm in females (p < 0.0001). AGD increased up to 12 months in both sexes and in a sex-dimorphic pattern. AGD was positively correlated with penile length at birth (r = 0.18, p = 0.003) and the increase in AGD from birth to 3 months was correlated with penile growth (r= 0.20, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: We report novel, longitudinal data for AGD during infancy in a large U.K. birth cohort. AGD was sex dimorphic at all ages studied. The availability of normative data provides a means of utilizing this biological marker of androgen action in population studies of the effects of environmental chemicals on genital development.
format Text
id pubmed-2801188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28011882010-01-04 Anogenital Distance from Birth to 2 Years: a Population Study Thankamony, Ajay Ong, Ken K. Dunger, David B. Acerini, Carlo L. Hughes, Ieuan A. Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: Anogenital distance (AGD) is sexually dimorphic in rodents and humans, being 2- to 2.5-fold greater in males. It is a reliable marker of androgen and antiandrogen effects in rodent reproductive toxicologic studies. Data on AGD in humans are sparse, with no longitudinal data collected during infancy. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine AGD from birth to 2 years in males and females and relate this to other anthropometric measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infants were recruited from the Cambridge Baby Growth Study. AGD was measured from the center of the anus to the base of the scrotum in males and to the posterior fourchette in females. Measurements were performed at birth and at 3, 12, 18, and 24 months of age. RESULTS: Data included 2,168 longitudinal AGD measurements from 463 male and 426 female full-term infants (median = 2 measurements per infant). Mean AGD (± SD) at birth was 19.8 ± 6.1 mm in males and 9.1 ± 2.8 mm in females (p < 0.0001). AGD increased up to 12 months in both sexes and in a sex-dimorphic pattern. AGD was positively correlated with penile length at birth (r = 0.18, p = 0.003) and the increase in AGD from birth to 3 months was correlated with penile growth (r= 0.20, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: We report novel, longitudinal data for AGD during infancy in a large U.K. birth cohort. AGD was sex dimorphic at all ages studied. The availability of normative data provides a means of utilizing this biological marker of androgen action in population studies of the effects of environmental chemicals on genital development. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2009-11 2009-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2801188/ /pubmed/20049133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900881 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Thankamony, Ajay
Ong, Ken K.
Dunger, David B.
Acerini, Carlo L.
Hughes, Ieuan A.
Anogenital Distance from Birth to 2 Years: a Population Study
title Anogenital Distance from Birth to 2 Years: a Population Study
title_full Anogenital Distance from Birth to 2 Years: a Population Study
title_fullStr Anogenital Distance from Birth to 2 Years: a Population Study
title_full_unstemmed Anogenital Distance from Birth to 2 Years: a Population Study
title_short Anogenital Distance from Birth to 2 Years: a Population Study
title_sort anogenital distance from birth to 2 years: a population study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2801188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20049133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900881
work_keys_str_mv AT thankamonyajay anogenitaldistancefrombirthto2yearsapopulationstudy
AT ongkenk anogenitaldistancefrombirthto2yearsapopulationstudy
AT dungerdavidb anogenitaldistancefrombirthto2yearsapopulationstudy
AT acerinicarlol anogenitaldistancefrombirthto2yearsapopulationstudy
AT hughesieuana anogenitaldistancefrombirthto2yearsapopulationstudy