Cargando…
The overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution
Overdiagnosis (and overtreatment) of cancers not bound to become symptomatic during lifetime is an unavoidable drawback of mammography screening. The magnitude of overdiagnosis has been estimated to be in the range of 5-10%, and thus acceptable in view of screening benefits as to reduced mortality....
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2801476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20015373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-9-34 |
_version_ | 1782175927712612352 |
---|---|
author | Ciatto, Stefano |
author_facet | Ciatto, Stefano |
author_sort | Ciatto, Stefano |
collection | PubMed |
description | Overdiagnosis (and overtreatment) of cancers not bound to become symptomatic during lifetime is an unavoidable drawback of mammography screening. The magnitude of overdiagnosis has been estimated to be in the range of 5-10%, and thus acceptable in view of screening benefits as to reduced mortality. In a recent research article in BMC Women's Health, Jørgensen, Zahl and Gøtzsche suggest that overdiagnosis may be as high as 33%, based on their analysis of breast cancer incidence in screened and non-screened areas in Denmark. Here we consider how reliable such analyses can be, why it might have been useful to adjust comparisons between screened and non-screened areas for early detection lead time, and what further evidence might be needed to build on or confirm these results. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2801476 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28014762010-01-05 The overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution Ciatto, Stefano BMC Womens Health Commentary Overdiagnosis (and overtreatment) of cancers not bound to become symptomatic during lifetime is an unavoidable drawback of mammography screening. The magnitude of overdiagnosis has been estimated to be in the range of 5-10%, and thus acceptable in view of screening benefits as to reduced mortality. In a recent research article in BMC Women's Health, Jørgensen, Zahl and Gøtzsche suggest that overdiagnosis may be as high as 33%, based on their analysis of breast cancer incidence in screened and non-screened areas in Denmark. Here we consider how reliable such analyses can be, why it might have been useful to adjust comparisons between screened and non-screened areas for early detection lead time, and what further evidence might be needed to build on or confirm these results. BioMed Central 2009-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2801476/ /pubmed/20015373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-9-34 Text en Copyright ©2009 Ciatto; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Ciatto, Stefano The overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution |
title | The overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution |
title_full | The overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution |
title_fullStr | The overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution |
title_full_unstemmed | The overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution |
title_short | The overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution |
title_sort | overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2801476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20015373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-9-34 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ciattostefano theoverdiagnosisnightmareatimeforcaution AT ciattostefano overdiagnosisnightmareatimeforcaution |