Cargando…

Promoter Recognition by a Complex of Spx and the C-Terminal Domain of the RNA Polymerase α Subunit

BACKGROUND: Spx, an ArsC (arsenate reductase) family member, is a global transcriptional regulator of the microbial stress response and is highly conserved amongst Gram-positive bacteria. Bacillus subtilis Spx protein exerts positive and negative control of transcription through its interaction with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakano, Michiko M., Lin, Ann, Zuber, Cole S., Newberry, Kate J., Brennan, Richard G., Zuber, Peter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2801614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20084284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008664
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Spx, an ArsC (arsenate reductase) family member, is a global transcriptional regulator of the microbial stress response and is highly conserved amongst Gram-positive bacteria. Bacillus subtilis Spx protein exerts positive and negative control of transcription through its interaction with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase (RNAP) α subunit (αCTD). Spx activates trxA (thioredoxin) and trxB (thioredoxin reductase) in response to thiol stress, and bears an N-terminal C10XXC13 redox disulfide center that is oxidized in active Spx. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The structure of mutant Spx(C10S) showed a change in the conformation of helix α4. Amino acid substitutions R60E and K62E within and adjacent to helix α4 conferred defects in Spx-activated transcription but not Spx-dependent repression. Electrophoretic mobility-shift assays showed αCTD interaction with trxB promoter DNA, but addition of Spx generated a supershifted complex that was disrupted in the presence of reductant (DTT). Interaction of αCTD/Spx complex with promoter DNA required the cis-acting elements -45AGCA-42 and -34AGCG-31 of the trxB promoter. The Spx(G52R) mutant, defective in αCTD binding, did not interact with the αCTD-trxB complex. Spx(R60E) not only failed to complex with αCTD-trxB, but also disrupted αCTD-trxB DNA interaction. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results show that Spx and αCTD form a complex that recognizes the promoter DNA of an Spx-controlled gene. A conformational change during oxidation of Spx to the disulfide form likely alters the structure of Spx α helix α4, which contains residues that function in transcriptional activation and αCTD/Spx-promoter interaction. The results suggest that one of these residues, R60 of the α4 region of oxidized Spx, functions in αCTD/Spx-promoter contact but not in αCTD interaction.