Cargando…

Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Retrograde ("fundus first") dissection is frequently used in open cholecystectomy and although feasible in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) it has not been widely practiced. LC is most simply carried out using antegrade dissection with a grasper to provide cephalad fundic trac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kelly, Michael D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2801662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-9-19
_version_ 1782175946983342080
author Kelly, Michael D
author_facet Kelly, Michael D
author_sort Kelly, Michael D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Retrograde ("fundus first") dissection is frequently used in open cholecystectomy and although feasible in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) it has not been widely practiced. LC is most simply carried out using antegrade dissection with a grasper to provide cephalad fundic traction. A series is presented to investigate the place of retrograde dissection in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon using modern instrumentation. METHODS: A prospective record of all LCs carried out by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon following his appointment in Bristol in 2004 was examined. Retrograde dissection was resorted to when difficulties were encountered with exposure and/or dissection of Calot's triangle. RESULTS: 1041 LCs were carried out including 148 (14%) emergency operations and 131 (13%) associated bile duct explorations. There were no bile duct injuries although conversion to open operation was required in six patients (0.6%). Retrograde LC was attempted successfully in 11 patients (1.1%). The age ranged from 28 to 80 years (mean 61) and there were 7 males. Indications were; fibrous, contracted gallbladder 7, Mirizzi syndrome 2 and severe kyphosis 2. Operative photographs are included to show the type of case where it was needed and the technique used. Postoperative stay was 1/2 to 5 days (mean 2.2) with no delayed sequelae on followup. Histopathology showed; chronic cholecystitis 7, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis 3 and acute necrotising cholecystitis 1. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, retrograde laparoscopic dissection was necessary in 1.1% of LCs and a liver retractor was needed in 9 of the 11 cases. This technique does have a place and should be in the armamentarium of the laparoscopic surgeon.
format Text
id pubmed-2801662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28016622010-01-05 Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy Kelly, Michael D BMC Surg Research article BACKGROUND: Retrograde ("fundus first") dissection is frequently used in open cholecystectomy and although feasible in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) it has not been widely practiced. LC is most simply carried out using antegrade dissection with a grasper to provide cephalad fundic traction. A series is presented to investigate the place of retrograde dissection in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon using modern instrumentation. METHODS: A prospective record of all LCs carried out by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon following his appointment in Bristol in 2004 was examined. Retrograde dissection was resorted to when difficulties were encountered with exposure and/or dissection of Calot's triangle. RESULTS: 1041 LCs were carried out including 148 (14%) emergency operations and 131 (13%) associated bile duct explorations. There were no bile duct injuries although conversion to open operation was required in six patients (0.6%). Retrograde LC was attempted successfully in 11 patients (1.1%). The age ranged from 28 to 80 years (mean 61) and there were 7 males. Indications were; fibrous, contracted gallbladder 7, Mirizzi syndrome 2 and severe kyphosis 2. Operative photographs are included to show the type of case where it was needed and the technique used. Postoperative stay was 1/2 to 5 days (mean 2.2) with no delayed sequelae on followup. Histopathology showed; chronic cholecystitis 7, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis 3 and acute necrotising cholecystitis 1. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, retrograde laparoscopic dissection was necessary in 1.1% of LCs and a liver retractor was needed in 9 of the 11 cases. This technique does have a place and should be in the armamentarium of the laparoscopic surgeon. BioMed Central 2009-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2801662/ /pubmed/20003333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-9-19 Text en Copyright ©2009 Kelly; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Kelly, Michael D
Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
title Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
title_full Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
title_fullStr Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
title_short Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
title_sort laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2801662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-9-19
work_keys_str_mv AT kellymichaeld laparoscopicretrogradefundusfirstcholecystectomy