Cargando…

Risk indicators to identify intimate partner violence in the emergency department

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence against women is prevalent and is associated with poor health outcomes. Understanding indicators of exposure to intimate partner violence can assist health care professionals to identify and respond to abused women. This study was undertaken to determine the str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wathen, C. Nadine, Jamieson, Ellen, Wilson, Margo, Daly, Martin, Worster, Andrew, MacMillan, Harriet L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Medicine Publications, Inc. 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2802016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20101295
_version_ 1782175976793309184
author Wathen, C. Nadine
Jamieson, Ellen
Wilson, Margo
Daly, Martin
Worster, Andrew
MacMillan, Harriet L
author_facet Wathen, C. Nadine
Jamieson, Ellen
Wilson, Margo
Daly, Martin
Worster, Andrew
MacMillan, Harriet L
author_sort Wathen, C. Nadine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence against women is prevalent and is associated with poor health outcomes. Understanding indicators of exposure to intimate partner violence can assist health care professionals to identify and respond to abused women. This study was undertaken to determine the strength of association between selected evidence-based risk indicators and exposure to intimate partner violence. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of 768 English-speaking women aged 18–64 years who presented to 2 emergency departments in Ontario, Canada, participants answered questions about risk indicators and completed the Composite Abuse Scale to determine their exposure to intimate partner violence in the past year. RESULTS: Intimate partner violence was significantly associated with being separated, in a common-law relationship or single (odds ratio [OR] = 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–3.71); scoring positive for depression (OR = 4.26, 95% CI 2.11–8.60) or somatic symptoms (OR = 4.09, 95% CI 2.18–7.67); having a male partner who was employed less than part time (OR = 5.12, 95% CI 2.46–10.64), or having a partner with an alcohol (OR = 4.36, 95% CI 2.16–8.81) or drug problem (OR = 4.63, 95% CI 1.89–11.38). Each unit increase in the number of indicators corresponded to a four-fold increase in the risk of intimate partner violence (OR = 3.92, 95% CI 3.06–5.02); women with 3 or more indicators had a greater than 50% probability of a positive score on the Composite Abuse Scale. Intimate partner violence was not associated with pregnancy status. CONCLUSION: Specific characteristics of male partners, relationships and women’s mental health are significantly related to exposure to intimate partner violence in the past year. Identification of these indicators has implications for the clinical care of women who present to health care settings.
format Text
id pubmed-2802016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Open Medicine Publications, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28020162010-01-25 Risk indicators to identify intimate partner violence in the emergency department Wathen, C. Nadine Jamieson, Ellen Wilson, Margo Daly, Martin Worster, Andrew MacMillan, Harriet L Open Med Research BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence against women is prevalent and is associated with poor health outcomes. Understanding indicators of exposure to intimate partner violence can assist health care professionals to identify and respond to abused women. This study was undertaken to determine the strength of association between selected evidence-based risk indicators and exposure to intimate partner violence. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of 768 English-speaking women aged 18–64 years who presented to 2 emergency departments in Ontario, Canada, participants answered questions about risk indicators and completed the Composite Abuse Scale to determine their exposure to intimate partner violence in the past year. RESULTS: Intimate partner violence was significantly associated with being separated, in a common-law relationship or single (odds ratio [OR] = 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–3.71); scoring positive for depression (OR = 4.26, 95% CI 2.11–8.60) or somatic symptoms (OR = 4.09, 95% CI 2.18–7.67); having a male partner who was employed less than part time (OR = 5.12, 95% CI 2.46–10.64), or having a partner with an alcohol (OR = 4.36, 95% CI 2.16–8.81) or drug problem (OR = 4.63, 95% CI 1.89–11.38). Each unit increase in the number of indicators corresponded to a four-fold increase in the risk of intimate partner violence (OR = 3.92, 95% CI 3.06–5.02); women with 3 or more indicators had a greater than 50% probability of a positive score on the Composite Abuse Scale. Intimate partner violence was not associated with pregnancy status. CONCLUSION: Specific characteristics of male partners, relationships and women’s mental health are significantly related to exposure to intimate partner violence in the past year. Identification of these indicators has implications for the clinical care of women who present to health care settings. Open Medicine Publications, Inc. 2007-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2802016/ /pubmed/20101295 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ca/ Open Medicine applies the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike License, which means that anyone is able to freely copy, download, reprint, reuse, distribute, display or perform this work and that authors retain copyright of their work. Any derivative use of this work must be distributed only under a license identical to this one and must be attributed to the authors. Any of these conditions can be waived with permission from the copyright holder. These conditions do not negate or supersede Fair Use laws in any country.
spellingShingle Research
Wathen, C. Nadine
Jamieson, Ellen
Wilson, Margo
Daly, Martin
Worster, Andrew
MacMillan, Harriet L
Risk indicators to identify intimate partner violence in the emergency department
title Risk indicators to identify intimate partner violence in the emergency department
title_full Risk indicators to identify intimate partner violence in the emergency department
title_fullStr Risk indicators to identify intimate partner violence in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Risk indicators to identify intimate partner violence in the emergency department
title_short Risk indicators to identify intimate partner violence in the emergency department
title_sort risk indicators to identify intimate partner violence in the emergency department
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2802016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20101295
work_keys_str_mv AT wathencnadine riskindicatorstoidentifyintimatepartnerviolenceintheemergencydepartment
AT jamiesonellen riskindicatorstoidentifyintimatepartnerviolenceintheemergencydepartment
AT wilsonmargo riskindicatorstoidentifyintimatepartnerviolenceintheemergencydepartment
AT dalymartin riskindicatorstoidentifyintimatepartnerviolenceintheemergencydepartment
AT worsterandrew riskindicatorstoidentifyintimatepartnerviolenceintheemergencydepartment
AT macmillanharrietl riskindicatorstoidentifyintimatepartnerviolenceintheemergencydepartment
AT riskindicatorstoidentifyintimatepartnerviolenceintheemergencydepartment