Cargando…
Mental capacity and psychiatric in-patients: implications for the new mental health law in England and Wales
Background In England and Wales mental health services need to take account of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Mental Health Act 1983. The overlap between these two causes dilemmas for clinicians. Aims To describe the frequency and characteristics of patients who fall into two potentially anoma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College Of Psychiatrists
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2802509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19721117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059782 |
_version_ | 1782176000339083264 |
---|---|
author | Owen, Gareth S. Szmukler, George Richardson, Genevra David, Anthony S. Hayward, Peter Rucker, James Harding, Duncan Hotopf, Matthew |
author_facet | Owen, Gareth S. Szmukler, George Richardson, Genevra David, Anthony S. Hayward, Peter Rucker, James Harding, Duncan Hotopf, Matthew |
author_sort | Owen, Gareth S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background In England and Wales mental health services need to take account of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Mental Health Act 1983. The overlap between these two causes dilemmas for clinicians. Aims To describe the frequency and characteristics of patients who fall into two potentially anomalous groups: those who are not detained but lack mental capacity; and those who are detained but have mental capacity. Method Cross-sectional study of 200 patients admitted to psychiatric wards. We assessed mental capacity using a semi-structured interview, the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT–T). Results Of the in-patient sample, 24% were informal but lacked capacity: these patients felt more coerced and had greater levels of treatment refusal than informal participants with capacity. People detained under the Mental Health Act with capacity comprised a small group (6%) that was hard to characterise. Conclusions Our data suggest that psychiatrists in England and Wales need to take account of the Mental Capacity Act, and in particular best interests judgments and deprivation of liberty safeguards, more explicitly than is perhaps currently the case. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2802509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Royal College Of Psychiatrists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28025092010-04-15 Mental capacity and psychiatric in-patients: implications for the new mental health law in England and Wales Owen, Gareth S. Szmukler, George Richardson, Genevra David, Anthony S. Hayward, Peter Rucker, James Harding, Duncan Hotopf, Matthew Br J Psychiatry Papers Background In England and Wales mental health services need to take account of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Mental Health Act 1983. The overlap between these two causes dilemmas for clinicians. Aims To describe the frequency and characteristics of patients who fall into two potentially anomalous groups: those who are not detained but lack mental capacity; and those who are detained but have mental capacity. Method Cross-sectional study of 200 patients admitted to psychiatric wards. We assessed mental capacity using a semi-structured interview, the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT–T). Results Of the in-patient sample, 24% were informal but lacked capacity: these patients felt more coerced and had greater levels of treatment refusal than informal participants with capacity. People detained under the Mental Health Act with capacity comprised a small group (6%) that was hard to characterise. Conclusions Our data suggest that psychiatrists in England and Wales need to take account of the Mental Capacity Act, and in particular best interests judgments and deprivation of liberty safeguards, more explicitly than is perhaps currently the case. Royal College Of Psychiatrists 2009-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2802509/ /pubmed/19721117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059782 Text en Royal College of Psychiatrists This paper accords with the Wellcome Trust Open Access policy and is governed by the licence available at http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/Wellcome%20Trust%20licence.pdf |
spellingShingle | Papers Owen, Gareth S. Szmukler, George Richardson, Genevra David, Anthony S. Hayward, Peter Rucker, James Harding, Duncan Hotopf, Matthew Mental capacity and psychiatric in-patients: implications for the new mental health law in England and Wales |
title | Mental capacity and psychiatric in-patients: implications for the new mental health law in England and Wales |
title_full | Mental capacity and psychiatric in-patients: implications for the new mental health law in England and Wales |
title_fullStr | Mental capacity and psychiatric in-patients: implications for the new mental health law in England and Wales |
title_full_unstemmed | Mental capacity and psychiatric in-patients: implications for the new mental health law in England and Wales |
title_short | Mental capacity and psychiatric in-patients: implications for the new mental health law in England and Wales |
title_sort | mental capacity and psychiatric in-patients: implications for the new mental health law in england and wales |
topic | Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2802509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19721117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059782 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT owengareths mentalcapacityandpsychiatricinpatientsimplicationsforthenewmentalhealthlawinenglandandwales AT szmuklergeorge mentalcapacityandpsychiatricinpatientsimplicationsforthenewmentalhealthlawinenglandandwales AT richardsongenevra mentalcapacityandpsychiatricinpatientsimplicationsforthenewmentalhealthlawinenglandandwales AT davidanthonys mentalcapacityandpsychiatricinpatientsimplicationsforthenewmentalhealthlawinenglandandwales AT haywardpeter mentalcapacityandpsychiatricinpatientsimplicationsforthenewmentalhealthlawinenglandandwales AT ruckerjames mentalcapacityandpsychiatricinpatientsimplicationsforthenewmentalhealthlawinenglandandwales AT hardingduncan mentalcapacityandpsychiatricinpatientsimplicationsforthenewmentalhealthlawinenglandandwales AT hotopfmatthew mentalcapacityandpsychiatricinpatientsimplicationsforthenewmentalhealthlawinenglandandwales |