Cargando…

Age-Sensitive Design of Online Health Information: Comparative Usability Study

BACKGROUND: Older adults’ health maintenance may be enhanced by having access to online health information. However, usability issues may prevent older adults from easily accessing such information. Prior research has shown that aging is associated with a unique pattern of cognitive changes, and kno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pak, Richard, Price, Margaux M, Thatcher, Jason
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2802567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19917549
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1220
_version_ 1782176009316990976
author Pak, Richard
Price, Margaux M
Thatcher, Jason
author_facet Pak, Richard
Price, Margaux M
Thatcher, Jason
author_sort Pak, Richard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Older adults’ health maintenance may be enhanced by having access to online health information. However, usability issues may prevent older adults from easily accessing such information. Prior research has shown that aging is associated with a unique pattern of cognitive changes, and knowledge of these changes may be used in the design of health websites for older adults. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the current study was to examine whether older adults use of a health information website was affected by an alternative information architecture and access interface (hierarchical versus tag-based). METHODS: Fifty younger adults (aged 18-23) and 50 older adults (aged 60-80) navigated a health information website, which was organized hierarchically or used tags/keywords, to find answers to health-related questions while their performance was tracked. We hypothesized that older adults would perform better in the tag-based health information website because it placed greater demands on abilities that remain intact with aging (verbal ability and vocabulary). RESULTS: The pattern of age-related differences in computer use was consistent with prior research with older adults. We found that older adults had been using computers for less time (F (1,98)= 10.6, P= .002) and used them less often (F (1,98)= 11.3, P= .001) than younger adults. Also consistent with the cognitive aging literature, younger adults had greater spatial visualization and orientation abilities (F (1,98)= 34.6, P< .001 and F (1,98)= 6.8, P= .01) and a larger memory span (F (1,98)= 5.7, P= .02) than older adults, but older adults had greater vocabulary (F (1,98)= 11.4, P= .001). Older adults also took significantly more medications than younger adults (F (1,98)= 57.7, P< .001). In the information search task, older adults performed worse than younger adults (F (1,96)= 18.0, P< .001). However, there was a significant age × condition interaction indicating that while younger adults outperformed older adults in the hierarchical condition (F (1,96)= 25.2, P< .001), there were no significant age-related differences in the tag-based condition, indicating that older adults performed as well as younger adults in this condition. CONCLUSIONS: Access to online health information is increasing in popularity and can lead to a more informed health consumer. However, usability barriers may differentially affect older adults. The results of the current study suggest that the design of health information websites that take into account age-related changes in cognition can enhance older adults’ access to such information.
format Text
id pubmed-2802567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28025672010-01-08 Age-Sensitive Design of Online Health Information: Comparative Usability Study Pak, Richard Price, Margaux M Thatcher, Jason J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Older adults’ health maintenance may be enhanced by having access to online health information. However, usability issues may prevent older adults from easily accessing such information. Prior research has shown that aging is associated with a unique pattern of cognitive changes, and knowledge of these changes may be used in the design of health websites for older adults. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the current study was to examine whether older adults use of a health information website was affected by an alternative information architecture and access interface (hierarchical versus tag-based). METHODS: Fifty younger adults (aged 18-23) and 50 older adults (aged 60-80) navigated a health information website, which was organized hierarchically or used tags/keywords, to find answers to health-related questions while their performance was tracked. We hypothesized that older adults would perform better in the tag-based health information website because it placed greater demands on abilities that remain intact with aging (verbal ability and vocabulary). RESULTS: The pattern of age-related differences in computer use was consistent with prior research with older adults. We found that older adults had been using computers for less time (F (1,98)= 10.6, P= .002) and used them less often (F (1,98)= 11.3, P= .001) than younger adults. Also consistent with the cognitive aging literature, younger adults had greater spatial visualization and orientation abilities (F (1,98)= 34.6, P< .001 and F (1,98)= 6.8, P= .01) and a larger memory span (F (1,98)= 5.7, P= .02) than older adults, but older adults had greater vocabulary (F (1,98)= 11.4, P= .001). Older adults also took significantly more medications than younger adults (F (1,98)= 57.7, P< .001). In the information search task, older adults performed worse than younger adults (F (1,96)= 18.0, P< .001). However, there was a significant age × condition interaction indicating that while younger adults outperformed older adults in the hierarchical condition (F (1,96)= 25.2, P< .001), there were no significant age-related differences in the tag-based condition, indicating that older adults performed as well as younger adults in this condition. CONCLUSIONS: Access to online health information is increasing in popularity and can lead to a more informed health consumer. However, usability barriers may differentially affect older adults. The results of the current study suggest that the design of health information websites that take into account age-related changes in cognition can enhance older adults’ access to such information. Gunther Eysenbach 2009-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2802567/ /pubmed/19917549 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1220 Text en © Richard Pak, Margaux M Price, Jason Thatcher. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 16.11.2009.   http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Pak, Richard
Price, Margaux M
Thatcher, Jason
Age-Sensitive Design of Online Health Information: Comparative Usability Study
title Age-Sensitive Design of Online Health Information: Comparative Usability Study
title_full Age-Sensitive Design of Online Health Information: Comparative Usability Study
title_fullStr Age-Sensitive Design of Online Health Information: Comparative Usability Study
title_full_unstemmed Age-Sensitive Design of Online Health Information: Comparative Usability Study
title_short Age-Sensitive Design of Online Health Information: Comparative Usability Study
title_sort age-sensitive design of online health information: comparative usability study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2802567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19917549
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1220
work_keys_str_mv AT pakrichard agesensitivedesignofonlinehealthinformationcomparativeusabilitystudy
AT pricemargauxm agesensitivedesignofonlinehealthinformationcomparativeusabilitystudy
AT thatcherjason agesensitivedesignofonlinehealthinformationcomparativeusabilitystudy