Cargando…
Assessing the utility of whole-genome amplified serum DNA for array-based high throughput genotyping
BACKGROUND: Whole genome amplification (WGA) offers new possibilities for genome-wide association studies where limited DNA samples have been collected. This study provides a realistic and high-precision assessment of WGA DNA genotyping performance from 20-year old archived serum samples using the A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2803178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20021669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-85 |
_version_ | 1782176026626883584 |
---|---|
author | Bucasas, Kristine L Pandya, Gagan A Pradhan, Sonal Fleischmann, Robert D Peterson, Scott N Belmont, John W |
author_facet | Bucasas, Kristine L Pandya, Gagan A Pradhan, Sonal Fleischmann, Robert D Peterson, Scott N Belmont, John W |
author_sort | Bucasas, Kristine L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Whole genome amplification (WGA) offers new possibilities for genome-wide association studies where limited DNA samples have been collected. This study provides a realistic and high-precision assessment of WGA DNA genotyping performance from 20-year old archived serum samples using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 (SNP6.0) platform. RESULTS: Whole-genome amplified (WGA) DNA samples from 45 archived serum replicates and 5 fresh sera paired with non-amplified genomic DNA were genotyped in duplicate. All genotyped samples passed the imposed QC thresholds for quantity and quality. In general, WGA serum DNA samples produced low call rates (45.00 +/- 2.69%), although reproducibility for successfully called markers was favorable (concordance = 95.61 +/- 4.39%). Heterozygote dropouts explained the majority (>85% in technical replicates, 50% in paired genomic/serum samples) of discordant results. Genotyping performance on WGA serum DNA samples was improved by implementation of Corrected Robust Linear Model with Maximum Likelihood Classification (CRLMM) algorithm but at the loss of many samples which failed to pass its quality threshold. Poor genotype clustering was evident in the samples that failed the CRLMM confidence threshold. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that while it is possible to extract genomic DNA and subsequently perform whole-genome amplification from archived serum samples, WGA serum DNA did not perform well and appeared unsuitable for high-resolution genotyping on these arrays. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2803178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28031782010-01-08 Assessing the utility of whole-genome amplified serum DNA for array-based high throughput genotyping Bucasas, Kristine L Pandya, Gagan A Pradhan, Sonal Fleischmann, Robert D Peterson, Scott N Belmont, John W BMC Genet Research article BACKGROUND: Whole genome amplification (WGA) offers new possibilities for genome-wide association studies where limited DNA samples have been collected. This study provides a realistic and high-precision assessment of WGA DNA genotyping performance from 20-year old archived serum samples using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 (SNP6.0) platform. RESULTS: Whole-genome amplified (WGA) DNA samples from 45 archived serum replicates and 5 fresh sera paired with non-amplified genomic DNA were genotyped in duplicate. All genotyped samples passed the imposed QC thresholds for quantity and quality. In general, WGA serum DNA samples produced low call rates (45.00 +/- 2.69%), although reproducibility for successfully called markers was favorable (concordance = 95.61 +/- 4.39%). Heterozygote dropouts explained the majority (>85% in technical replicates, 50% in paired genomic/serum samples) of discordant results. Genotyping performance on WGA serum DNA samples was improved by implementation of Corrected Robust Linear Model with Maximum Likelihood Classification (CRLMM) algorithm but at the loss of many samples which failed to pass its quality threshold. Poor genotype clustering was evident in the samples that failed the CRLMM confidence threshold. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that while it is possible to extract genomic DNA and subsequently perform whole-genome amplification from archived serum samples, WGA serum DNA did not perform well and appeared unsuitable for high-resolution genotyping on these arrays. BioMed Central 2009-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2803178/ /pubmed/20021669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-85 Text en Copyright ©2009 Bucasas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Bucasas, Kristine L Pandya, Gagan A Pradhan, Sonal Fleischmann, Robert D Peterson, Scott N Belmont, John W Assessing the utility of whole-genome amplified serum DNA for array-based high throughput genotyping |
title | Assessing the utility of whole-genome amplified serum DNA for array-based high throughput genotyping |
title_full | Assessing the utility of whole-genome amplified serum DNA for array-based high throughput genotyping |
title_fullStr | Assessing the utility of whole-genome amplified serum DNA for array-based high throughput genotyping |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the utility of whole-genome amplified serum DNA for array-based high throughput genotyping |
title_short | Assessing the utility of whole-genome amplified serum DNA for array-based high throughput genotyping |
title_sort | assessing the utility of whole-genome amplified serum dna for array-based high throughput genotyping |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2803178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20021669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-85 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bucasaskristinel assessingtheutilityofwholegenomeamplifiedserumdnaforarraybasedhighthroughputgenotyping AT pandyagagana assessingtheutilityofwholegenomeamplifiedserumdnaforarraybasedhighthroughputgenotyping AT pradhansonal assessingtheutilityofwholegenomeamplifiedserumdnaforarraybasedhighthroughputgenotyping AT fleischmannrobertd assessingtheutilityofwholegenomeamplifiedserumdnaforarraybasedhighthroughputgenotyping AT petersonscottn assessingtheutilityofwholegenomeamplifiedserumdnaforarraybasedhighthroughputgenotyping AT belmontjohnw assessingtheutilityofwholegenomeamplifiedserumdnaforarraybasedhighthroughputgenotyping |