Cargando…

Variation in diabetes care by age: opportunities for customization of care

BACKGROUND: The quality of diabetes care provided to older adults has usually been judged to be poor, but few data provide direct comparison to other age groups. In this study, we hypothesized that adults age 65 and over receive lower quality diabetes care than adults age 45–64 years old. METHODS: W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Connor, Patrick J, Desai, Jay R, Solberg, Leif I, Rush, William A, Bishop, Donald B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC280680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14585101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-4-16
_version_ 1782121061894062080
author O'Connor, Patrick J
Desai, Jay R
Solberg, Leif I
Rush, William A
Bishop, Donald B
author_facet O'Connor, Patrick J
Desai, Jay R
Solberg, Leif I
Rush, William A
Bishop, Donald B
author_sort O'Connor, Patrick J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The quality of diabetes care provided to older adults has usually been judged to be poor, but few data provide direct comparison to other age groups. In this study, we hypothesized that adults age 65 and over receive lower quality diabetes care than adults age 45–64 years old. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of members of a health plan cared for by multiple medical groups in Minnesota. Study subjects were a random sample of 1109 adults age 45 and over with an established diagnosis of diabetes using a diabetes identification method with estimated sensitivity 0.91 and positive predictive value 0.94. Survey data (response rate 86.2%) and administrative databases were used to assess diabetes severity, glycemic control, quality of life, microvascular and macrovascular risks and complications, preventive care, utilization, and perceptions of diabetes. RESULTS: Compared to those aged 45–64 years (N = 627), those 65 and older (N = 482) had better glycemic control, better health-related behaviors, and perceived less adverse impacts of diabetes on their quality of life despite longer duration of diabetes and a prevalence of cardiovascular disease twice that of younger patients. Older patients did not ascribe heart disease to their diabetes. Younger adults often had explanatory models of diabetes that interfere with effective and aggressive care, and accessed care less frequently. Overall, only 37% of patients were simultaneously up-to-date on eye exams, foot exams, and glycated hemoglobin (A1c) tests within one year. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the need for further improvement in diabetes care for all patients, and suggest that customisation of care based on age and explanatory models of diabetes may be an improvement strategy that merits further evaluation.
format Text
id pubmed-280680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-2806802003-12-02 Variation in diabetes care by age: opportunities for customization of care O'Connor, Patrick J Desai, Jay R Solberg, Leif I Rush, William A Bishop, Donald B BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The quality of diabetes care provided to older adults has usually been judged to be poor, but few data provide direct comparison to other age groups. In this study, we hypothesized that adults age 65 and over receive lower quality diabetes care than adults age 45–64 years old. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of members of a health plan cared for by multiple medical groups in Minnesota. Study subjects were a random sample of 1109 adults age 45 and over with an established diagnosis of diabetes using a diabetes identification method with estimated sensitivity 0.91 and positive predictive value 0.94. Survey data (response rate 86.2%) and administrative databases were used to assess diabetes severity, glycemic control, quality of life, microvascular and macrovascular risks and complications, preventive care, utilization, and perceptions of diabetes. RESULTS: Compared to those aged 45–64 years (N = 627), those 65 and older (N = 482) had better glycemic control, better health-related behaviors, and perceived less adverse impacts of diabetes on their quality of life despite longer duration of diabetes and a prevalence of cardiovascular disease twice that of younger patients. Older patients did not ascribe heart disease to their diabetes. Younger adults often had explanatory models of diabetes that interfere with effective and aggressive care, and accessed care less frequently. Overall, only 37% of patients were simultaneously up-to-date on eye exams, foot exams, and glycated hemoglobin (A1c) tests within one year. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the need for further improvement in diabetes care for all patients, and suggest that customisation of care based on age and explanatory models of diabetes may be an improvement strategy that merits further evaluation. BioMed Central 2003-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC280680/ /pubmed/14585101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-4-16 Text en Copyright © 2003 O'Connor et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
O'Connor, Patrick J
Desai, Jay R
Solberg, Leif I
Rush, William A
Bishop, Donald B
Variation in diabetes care by age: opportunities for customization of care
title Variation in diabetes care by age: opportunities for customization of care
title_full Variation in diabetes care by age: opportunities for customization of care
title_fullStr Variation in diabetes care by age: opportunities for customization of care
title_full_unstemmed Variation in diabetes care by age: opportunities for customization of care
title_short Variation in diabetes care by age: opportunities for customization of care
title_sort variation in diabetes care by age: opportunities for customization of care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC280680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14585101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-4-16
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorpatrickj variationindiabetescarebyageopportunitiesforcustomizationofcare
AT desaijayr variationindiabetescarebyageopportunitiesforcustomizationofcare
AT solbergleifi variationindiabetescarebyageopportunitiesforcustomizationofcare
AT rushwilliama variationindiabetescarebyageopportunitiesforcustomizationofcare
AT bishopdonaldb variationindiabetescarebyageopportunitiesforcustomizationofcare