Cargando…

Validation of the Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) for the lower extremity

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory joint diseases tend due to new treatments to be more physically active; something not taken into account by currently used outcome measures. The Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) is an adaptation of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bremander, Ann BI, Petersson, Ingemar F, Roos, Ewa M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC280699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14613567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-55
_version_ 1782121066422861824
author Bremander, Ann BI
Petersson, Ingemar F
Roos, Ewa M
author_facet Bremander, Ann BI
Petersson, Ingemar F
Roos, Ewa M
author_sort Bremander, Ann BI
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory joint diseases tend due to new treatments to be more physically active; something not taken into account by currently used outcome measures. The Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) is an adaptation of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and evaluates functional limitations of importance to physically active people with inflammatory joint diseases and problems from the lower extremities. The aim of the study was to test the RAOS for validity, reliability and responsiveness. METHODS: 119 in-patients with inflammatory joint disease (51% RA) admitted to multidisciplinary care, mean age 56 (±13), 73% women, mean disease duration 18 (±14) yr were consecutively enrolled. They all received the RAOS, the SF-36, the HAQ and four subscales of the AIMS2 twice during their stay for test of validity and responsiveness. Test-retest reliability of the RAOS questionnaire was calculated on 52 patients using the first or second administration and an additional mailed questionnaire. RESULTS: The RAOS met set criteria of reliability and validity. The random intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC (2,1)) for the five subscales ranged from 0.76 to 0.92, indicating that individual comparisons were possible except for the subscale Sport and Recreation Function. Inter-item correlation measured by Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.78 to 0.95. When measuring construct validity the highest correlations occurred between subscales intended to measure similar constructs. Change over time (24 (± 7) days) due to multidisciplinary care was significant for all subscales (p < 0.001). The effect sizes ranged from 0.30–0.44 and were considered small to medium. All the RAOS subscales were more responsive than the HAQ. Some of the SF-36 subscales and the AIMS2 subscales were more responsive than the RAOS subscales. CONCLUSION: It is possible to adapt already existing outcome measures to assess other groups with musculoskeletal difficulties in the lower extremity. The RAOS is a reliable, valid and responsive outcome instrument for assessment of multidisciplinary care. To fully validate the RAOS further studies are needed in other populations.
format Text
id pubmed-280699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-2806992003-12-02 Validation of the Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) for the lower extremity Bremander, Ann BI Petersson, Ingemar F Roos, Ewa M Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory joint diseases tend due to new treatments to be more physically active; something not taken into account by currently used outcome measures. The Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) is an adaptation of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and evaluates functional limitations of importance to physically active people with inflammatory joint diseases and problems from the lower extremities. The aim of the study was to test the RAOS for validity, reliability and responsiveness. METHODS: 119 in-patients with inflammatory joint disease (51% RA) admitted to multidisciplinary care, mean age 56 (±13), 73% women, mean disease duration 18 (±14) yr were consecutively enrolled. They all received the RAOS, the SF-36, the HAQ and four subscales of the AIMS2 twice during their stay for test of validity and responsiveness. Test-retest reliability of the RAOS questionnaire was calculated on 52 patients using the first or second administration and an additional mailed questionnaire. RESULTS: The RAOS met set criteria of reliability and validity. The random intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC (2,1)) for the five subscales ranged from 0.76 to 0.92, indicating that individual comparisons were possible except for the subscale Sport and Recreation Function. Inter-item correlation measured by Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.78 to 0.95. When measuring construct validity the highest correlations occurred between subscales intended to measure similar constructs. Change over time (24 (± 7) days) due to multidisciplinary care was significant for all subscales (p < 0.001). The effect sizes ranged from 0.30–0.44 and were considered small to medium. All the RAOS subscales were more responsive than the HAQ. Some of the SF-36 subscales and the AIMS2 subscales were more responsive than the RAOS subscales. CONCLUSION: It is possible to adapt already existing outcome measures to assess other groups with musculoskeletal difficulties in the lower extremity. The RAOS is a reliable, valid and responsive outcome instrument for assessment of multidisciplinary care. To fully validate the RAOS further studies are needed in other populations. BioMed Central 2003-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC280699/ /pubmed/14613567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-55 Text en Copyright © 2003 Bremander et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research
Bremander, Ann BI
Petersson, Ingemar F
Roos, Ewa M
Validation of the Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) for the lower extremity
title Validation of the Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) for the lower extremity
title_full Validation of the Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) for the lower extremity
title_fullStr Validation of the Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) for the lower extremity
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) for the lower extremity
title_short Validation of the Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) for the lower extremity
title_sort validation of the rheumatoid and arthritis outcome score (raos) for the lower extremity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC280699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14613567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-55
work_keys_str_mv AT bremanderannbi validationoftherheumatoidandarthritisoutcomescoreraosforthelowerextremity
AT peterssoningemarf validationoftherheumatoidandarthritisoutcomescoreraosforthelowerextremity
AT roosewam validationoftherheumatoidandarthritisoutcomescoreraosforthelowerextremity