Cargando…
Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study
In breast radiotherapy, skin flashing of treatment fields is important to account for intrafraction movements and setup errors. This study compares the two different intensity extension methods, namely, Virtual Bolus method and skin flash tool method, to provide skin flashing in intensity modulated...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2807141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20098549 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.56079 |
_version_ | 1782176382820810752 |
---|---|
author | Sankar, A. Velmurugan, J. |
author_facet | Sankar, A. Velmurugan, J. |
author_sort | Sankar, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In breast radiotherapy, skin flashing of treatment fields is important to account for intrafraction movements and setup errors. This study compares the two different intensity extension methods, namely, Virtual Bolus method and skin flash tool method, to provide skin flashing in intensity modulated treatment fields. The impact of these two different intensity extension methods on skin dose was studied by measuring the entrance dose of the treatment fields using semiconductor diode detectors. We found no significant difference in entrance dose due to different methods used for intensity extension. However, in the skin flash tool method, selection of appropriate parameters is important to get optimum fluence extension. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2807141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28071412010-01-22 Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study Sankar, A. Velmurugan, J. J Med Phys Original Article In breast radiotherapy, skin flashing of treatment fields is important to account for intrafraction movements and setup errors. This study compares the two different intensity extension methods, namely, Virtual Bolus method and skin flash tool method, to provide skin flashing in intensity modulated treatment fields. The impact of these two different intensity extension methods on skin dose was studied by measuring the entrance dose of the treatment fields using semiconductor diode detectors. We found no significant difference in entrance dose due to different methods used for intensity extension. However, in the skin flash tool method, selection of appropriate parameters is important to get optimum fluence extension. Medknow Publications 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2807141/ /pubmed/20098549 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.56079 Text en © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sankar, A. Velmurugan, J. Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study |
title | Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study |
title_full | Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study |
title_fullStr | Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study |
title_full_unstemmed | Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study |
title_short | Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study |
title_sort | different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: a study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2807141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20098549 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.56079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sankara differentintensityextensionmethodsandtheirimpactonentrancedoseinbreastradiotherapyastudy AT velmuruganj differentintensityextensionmethodsandtheirimpactonentrancedoseinbreastradiotherapyastudy |