Cargando…

Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study

In breast radiotherapy, skin flashing of treatment fields is important to account for intrafraction movements and setup errors. This study compares the two different intensity extension methods, namely, Virtual Bolus method and skin flash tool method, to provide skin flashing in intensity modulated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sankar, A., Velmurugan, J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2807141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20098549
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.56079
_version_ 1782176382820810752
author Sankar, A.
Velmurugan, J.
author_facet Sankar, A.
Velmurugan, J.
author_sort Sankar, A.
collection PubMed
description In breast radiotherapy, skin flashing of treatment fields is important to account for intrafraction movements and setup errors. This study compares the two different intensity extension methods, namely, Virtual Bolus method and skin flash tool method, to provide skin flashing in intensity modulated treatment fields. The impact of these two different intensity extension methods on skin dose was studied by measuring the entrance dose of the treatment fields using semiconductor diode detectors. We found no significant difference in entrance dose due to different methods used for intensity extension. However, in the skin flash tool method, selection of appropriate parameters is important to get optimum fluence extension.
format Text
id pubmed-2807141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28071412010-01-22 Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study Sankar, A. Velmurugan, J. J Med Phys Original Article In breast radiotherapy, skin flashing of treatment fields is important to account for intrafraction movements and setup errors. This study compares the two different intensity extension methods, namely, Virtual Bolus method and skin flash tool method, to provide skin flashing in intensity modulated treatment fields. The impact of these two different intensity extension methods on skin dose was studied by measuring the entrance dose of the treatment fields using semiconductor diode detectors. We found no significant difference in entrance dose due to different methods used for intensity extension. However, in the skin flash tool method, selection of appropriate parameters is important to get optimum fluence extension. Medknow Publications 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2807141/ /pubmed/20098549 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.56079 Text en © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sankar, A.
Velmurugan, J.
Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study
title Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study
title_full Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study
title_fullStr Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study
title_full_unstemmed Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study
title_short Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study
title_sort different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: a study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2807141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20098549
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.56079
work_keys_str_mv AT sankara differentintensityextensionmethodsandtheirimpactonentrancedoseinbreastradiotherapyastudy
AT velmuruganj differentintensityextensionmethodsandtheirimpactonentrancedoseinbreastradiotherapyastudy